148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7557600)
1. The reliability of preconization diagnostic evaluation in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and microinvasive carcinoma.
Andersen ES; Nielsen K; Pedersen B
Gynecol Oncol; 1995 Oct; 59(1):143-7. PubMed ID: 7557600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Avoiding conization for inadequate colposcopy. Suggestions for conservative therapy.
Yandell RB; Hannigan EV; Dinh TV; Buchanan VS
J Reprod Med; 1996 Mar; 41(3):135-9. PubMed ID: 8778408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The efficacy of conservative management after conization in patients with stage IA1 microinvasive cervical carcinoma.
Lee SW; Kim YM; Son WS; You HJ; Kim DY; Kim JH; Kim YT; Nam JH
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(2):209-15. PubMed ID: 19093236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Value of endocervical margin and high-risk human papillomavirus status after conization for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, adenocarcinoma in situ, and microinvasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
Kong TW; Son JH; Chang SJ; Paek J; Lee Y; Ryu HS
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Dec; 135(3):468-73. PubMed ID: 25284039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Outcome after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III: relation with surgical margins, extension to the crypts and mitoses.
Maluf PJ; Adad SJ; Murta EF
Tumori; 2004; 90(5):473-7. PubMed ID: 15656332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Risk factors predicting residual disease in subsequent hysterectomy following conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) III and microinvasive cervical cancer.
Park JY; Lee SM; Yoo CW; Kang S; Park SY; Seo SS
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Oct; 107(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 17582476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The use of carbon-dioxide laser surgery in the treatment of intraepithelial neoplasia of the uterine cervix.
Favalli G; Lomini M; Schreiber C; Ciravolo G; Junasevic J; Pecorelli S; Bianchi UA
Przegl Lek; 1999; 56(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 10375929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic and therapeutic laser conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Ueda M; Ueki K; Kanemura M; Izuma S; Yamaguchi H; Nishiyama K; Tanaka Y; Terai Y; Ueki M
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Apr; 101(1):143-6. PubMed ID: 16271274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The correlation between the grade of dyskaryosis on cervical smear, grade of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) on punch biopsy and the final histological diagnosis on cone biopsies of the cervix.
Heatley MK; Bury JP
Cytopathology; 1998 Apr; 9(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 9577735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) with colposcopic biopsy and efficacy of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP).
Duesing N; Schwarz J; Choschzick M; Jaenicke F; Gieseking F; Issa R; Mahner S; Woelber L
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Dec; 286(6):1549-54. PubMed ID: 22865036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Importance of surgical margins in conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III.
Murta EF; Resende AV; Souza MA; Adad SJ; Salum R
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1999 Nov; 263(1-2):42-4. PubMed ID: 10728628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laser conization: the results of treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Andersen ES; Pedersen B; Nielsen K
Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Aug; 54(2):201-4. PubMed ID: 8063246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. High-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in pregnancy: clinicotherapeutic management.
Penna C; Fallani MG; Maggiorelli M; Zipoli E; Cardelli A; Marchionni M
Tumori; 1998; 84(5):567-70. PubMed ID: 9862518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predictors and clinical significance of the positive cone margin in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III patients.
Sun XG; Ma SQ; Zhang JX; Wu M
Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Feb; 122(4):367-72. PubMed ID: 19302737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. High-grade CIN on cervical biopsy and predictors of the subsequent cone histology results in women undergoing immediate conization.
Giannella L; Mfuta K; Gardini G; Rubino T; Fodero C; Prandi S
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Mar; 186():68-74. PubMed ID: 25656975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III: long-term follow-up after cold-knife conization with involved margins.
Reich O; Lahousen M; Pickel H; Tamussino K; Winter R
Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Feb; 99(2):193-6. PubMed ID: 11814495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Repeat surgery in patients with cervical cancer stage FIGO IA1: a series of 156 cases and a review of the literature.
Hefler LA; Polterauer S; Schneitter A; Concin N; Hofstetter G; Bentz E; Leipold H; Tempfer C; Reinthaller A
Anticancer Res; 2010 Feb; 30(2):565-8. PubMed ID: 20332471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Study on high risk factors associated with positive margin of cervix conization in patient with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
Lu HX; Chen YX; Ni J; Wan XY; Lü WG; Xie X
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Mar; 44(3):200-3. PubMed ID: 19570446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Indications for cone biopsy: pathologic correlation.
Spitzer M; Chernys AE; Shifrin A; Ryskin M
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jan; 178(1 Pt 1):74-9. PubMed ID: 9465807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Predictors of residual lesion in cervix after conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and microinvasive cervical cancer].
Tan XJ; Wu M; Lang JH; Ma SQ; Shen K; Yang J
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Jan; 89(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 19489237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
