BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 755777)

  • 1. [Atrial stimulation in sick sinus syndrome].
    Boccadamo R; Altamura G
    G Ital Cardiol; 1978; 8 Suppl 3():70-2. PubMed ID: 755777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Atrial versus ventricular pacing in sick sinus syndrome: the role of retrograde ventriculoatrial conduction.
    Kolk R; Samarütel J; Väli J
    Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1994; 83(3):220-4. PubMed ID: 7857066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Exploration of pacing treatment in sick sinus syndrome].
    Wang KP
    Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 1992 Oct; 20(5):303-5. PubMed ID: 1306825
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Single-chamber atrial pacing is better than single chamber ventricular pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome. Results of long-term follow up in a prospective randomized study].
    Nielsen JC; Mortensen PT; Thuesen L; Nielsen TV; Thomsen PE; Pedersen AK; Andersen HR
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1999 Feb; 161(5):587-92. PubMed ID: 9989193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acquired atrioventricular block in a patient with sinus node disease on single-chamber atrial pacing.
    Vijayvergiya R; Grover A
    Indian Heart J; 2002; 54(4):435-6. PubMed ID: 12462677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The use of auto mode switching in patients with sick sinus syndrome].
    Vlasínová J
    Cas Lek Cesk; 2005; 144(2):109-11; discussion 112. PubMed ID: 15807297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Sick sinus syndrome. Pacemaker with atrial versus ventricular stimulation].
    Andersen HR; Thuesen L; Bagger JP; Vesterlund T; Thomsen PE
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1996 Feb; 158(8):1062-7. PubMed ID: 8638338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [An intrapatient comparison of adaptation to aerobic and anaerobic exertion during 3 types of physiological cardiac stimulation in chronotropic failure of the sinus node: DDD, VVIR and DDDR].
    Occhetta E; Perucca A; Fazzari M; Pistis G; Baduini G; Trevi G
    Cardiologia; 1997 Jan; 42(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 9118155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Activity detecting rate responsive atrial pacing].
    Shigenobu M; Kubo Y; Senoo Y; Teramoto S; Nakamura A; Nagao T
    Kyobu Geka; 1988 Aug; 41(9):727-33. PubMed ID: 3249517
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Temporary and permanent antitachycardial stimulation].
    Lüderitz B
    Verh Dtsch Ges Herz Kreislaufforsch; 1981; 47():111-32. PubMed ID: 7331474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Clinical experience with multiprogrammable pacemakers].
    Dubernet J; Fajuri A; Maturana G; Irarrazaval MJ; Morán S; González J; Turner E; Salles B; Sapag MT
    Rev Med Chil; 1987 Apr; 115(4):303-7. PubMed ID: 3448738
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pacing mode selection in patients with sick sinus syndrome.
    Nielsen JC
    Dan Med Bull; 2007 Feb; 54(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 17349215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Physiological heart stimulation using a new type of pacemaker].
    Crook BR; Vlootman CJ; Slagmolen PJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1982 Jul; 126(30):1363-7. PubMed ID: 7133169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Transvenous pacemaker implantations for sick sinus syndrome (2 cases) complicating with persistent left superior vena cava (author's transl)].
    Koseki K; Yamate N; Tanaka S; Noguchi S; Ikeshita M; Sakakibara S; Saito F; Shoji T
    Kyobu Geka; 1980; 33(5):362-6. PubMed ID: 7382214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Comparative study of atrial pacing and ventricular pacing for the treatment of sick sinus syndrome (author's transl)].
    Ihara K
    Nihon Kyobu Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1982 Mar; 30(3):366-73. PubMed ID: 7108295
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Twiddler's syndrome and pectoral stimulation in a patient with dual-site unipolar atrial pacing.
    Occhetta E; Bortnik M; Francalacci G; Magnani A; Plebani L; Vassanelli C
    Ital Heart J; 2004 May; 5(5):399-402. PubMed ID: 15185907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-term haemodynamic and antiarrhythmic benefits of DDIR versus DDI pacing mode in sick sinus syndrome and chronotropic incompetence.
    Santini M; Ricci R; Puglisi A; Mangiameli S; Proclemer A; Menozzi C; De Fabrizio G; Leoni G; Lisi F; De Seta F
    G Ital Cardiol; 1997 Sep; 27(9):892-900. PubMed ID: 9378194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Permanent endocardiac atrial pacing and sensing. Preliminary experience with screwing catheters].
    Santini M; Alliegro A; Boschetti C; Masini V
    G Ital Cardiol; 1980; 10(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 7461304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Implanting an atrial pacemaker].
    Székely A; Sugár T; Böhm A
    Orv Hetil; 1990 Dec; 131(52):2855-9. PubMed ID: 2274325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Crosstalk triggered safety standby pacing associated with an improperly seated ventricular lead.
    Sun Q; Chen K; Zhang S
    Europace; 2008 Jan; 10(1):75-6. PubMed ID: 18025063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.