251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7558660)
1. The accuracy of dental radiographic techniques used for evaluation of implant fixture placement.
Gher ME; Richardson AC
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1995 Jun; 15(3):268-83. PubMed ID: 7558660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interpretation of linear and computed tomograms in the assessment of implant recipient sites.
Todd AD; Gher ME; Quintero G; Richardson AC
J Periodontol; 1993 Dec; 64(12):1243-9. PubMed ID: 8106953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of the diagnostic advantages of panoramic radiography and computed tomography scanning for placement of root form dental implants.
Reddy MS; Mayfield-Donahoo T; Vanderven FJ; Jeffcoat MK
Clin Oral Implants Res; 1994 Dec; 5(4):229-38. PubMed ID: 7640337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of panoramic radiography with computed tomography in the planning of implant surgery.
Tal H; Moses O
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 Feb; 20(1):40-2. PubMed ID: 1884852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of dimensional accuracy of panoramic cross-sectional tomography, its ability to identify the inferior alveolar canal, and its impact on estimation of appropriate implant dimensions in the mandibular posterior region.
Mehra A; Pai KM
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Mar; 14(1):100-11. PubMed ID: 19673959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Radiographic modalities for diagnosis and treatment planning in implant dentistry.
Garg AK; Vicari A
Implant Soc; 1995; 5(5):7-11. PubMed ID: 9571835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cone beam computerized tomography-based dental imaging for implant planning and surgical guidance, Part 1: Single implant in the mandibular molar region.
Almog DM; LaMar J; LaMar FR; LaMar F
J Oral Implantol; 2006; 32(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 16704109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of computerized tomography for the evaluation of mandibular sites prior to implant placement.
Sforza NM; Franchini F; Lamma A; Botticelli S; Ghigi G
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2007 Dec; 27(6):589-95. PubMed ID: 18092453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The use of computerized tomography for diagnosis and treatment planning in implant dentistry.
Iplikçioğlu H; Akça K; Cehreli MC
J Oral Implantol; 2002; 28(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 12498461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The use of 3 different imaging methods for the localization of the mandibular canal in dental implant planning.
Peker I; Alkurt MT; Michcioglu T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(3):463-70. PubMed ID: 18700369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of two-dimensional orthoradially reformatted computed tomography and panoramic radiography for dental implant treatment planning.
Lam EW; Ruprecht A; Yang J
J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Jul; 74(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 7674189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Denta Scan: CT software program used in the anatomic evaluation of the mandible and maxilla in the perspective of endosseous implant surgery.
Casselman JW; Deryckere F; Hermans R; Declercq C; Neyt L; Pattyn G; Meeus L; Vandevoorde P; Steyaert L; Devos V
Rofo; 1991 Jul; 155(1):4-10. PubMed ID: 1854934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Conventional spiral and low-dose computed mandibular tomography for dental implant planning.
Ekestubbe A
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 138():1-82. PubMed ID: 10635103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radiologic measurements of the mandible: a comparison between CT-reformatted and conventional tomographic images.
Hanazawa T; Sano T; Seki K; Okano T
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Apr; 15(2):226-32. PubMed ID: 15008935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Pre-implantation evaluation using medical imagery: scanner or Scanora?].
Hanssens JF
Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 1996; 51(2):101-10. PubMed ID: 9289749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perioperative validation of localisation of the mental foramen.
Bou Serhal C; Jacobs R; Flygare L; Quirynen M; van Steenberghe D
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jan; 31(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 11803387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dental implant imaging: TeraRecon's Dental 3D Cone Beam Computed Tomography System.
Garg AK
Dent Implantol Update; 2007 Jun; 18(6):41-5. PubMed ID: 17682685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Implant site assessment using panoramic cross-sectional tomographic imaging.
Potter BJ; Shrout MK; Russell CM; Sharawy M
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Oct; 84(4):436-42. PubMed ID: 9347511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic imaging for dental implant assessment.
Benson BW
Tex Dent J; 1995 Feb; 112(2):37-41. PubMed ID: 8633304
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. CT-based dental imaging for implant planning and surgical guidance.
Almog DM; Romano PR
N Y State Dent J; 2007 Jan; 73(1):51-3. PubMed ID: 17378318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
