These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7558787)
1. Human experimentation and clinical trials [correction of trails]. Rosner F Isr J Med Sci; 1995 Sep; 31(9):580-2. PubMed ID: 7558787 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. 1931 German guidelines on human experimentation. Int Dig Health Legis; 1980; 31(2):408-11. PubMed ID: 11645672 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The moral imperatives of medical research in human subjects. Lieberman JA; Sloan J J Calif Alliance Ment Ill; 1994; 5(1):40-2. PubMed ID: 11653319 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Information for consent in human experimentation. Dickens BM Univ Tor Law J; 1974; 24(4):381-410. PubMed ID: 11664387 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Protectionism and the new research imperative in pediatric AIDS. Ackerman TF IRB; 1990; 12(5):1-5. PubMed ID: 11654001 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Experimenting on human subjects. May WE Linacre Q; 1974 Nov; 41(4):238-52. PubMed ID: 11662103 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Ethical difficulties with randomized clinical trials involving cancer patients: examples from the field of gynecologic oncology. Markman M J Clin Ethics; 1992; 3(3):193-5. PubMed ID: 1356520 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Moral issues in medical experimentation on humans. Cohen C Philos Exch; 1979; 2(5):37-51. PubMed ID: 11658450 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The IRB's role in assessing the generalizability of non-NIH-funded clinical trials. Weijer C IRB; 1998; 20(2-3):1-5. PubMed ID: 11656912 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Establishing the boundaries of ethically permissible research with special populations. Weisstub DN; Arboleda-Florez J; Tomossy GF Health Law Can; 1996 Nov; 17(2):45-63. PubMed ID: 10172809 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Legal and ethical concepts involved in informed consent to human research. Woody KJ Calif West Law Rev; 1981; 18(1):50-79. PubMed ID: 11658328 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Sham surgery and genuine standards of care: can the two be reconciled? London AJ; Kadane JB Am J Bioeth; 2003; 3(4):61-4. PubMed ID: 14744339 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. An IRB member's perspective on access to innovative therapy. Moore DL Albany Law Rev; 1994; 57(3):559-81. PubMed ID: 11652854 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Experimentation on human subjects: a search for Halakhic guidelines. Stern K Tradition; 1979 Sep; 17(4):41-52. PubMed ID: 11662672 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Moral solutions in assessing research risk. Miller PB; Weijer C IRB; 2000; 22(5):6-10. PubMed ID: 11883479 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Testing new technologies. Preston TA Med World News; 1985 Jun; 26(11):31. PubMed ID: 11645554 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Law No. 94-630 of 25 July 1994 amending Book II bis of the Public Health Code relating to the protection of persons participating in biomedical research. (Journal officiel de la République française, Lois et Décrets, 26 July 1994, No. 171, p. 10747-10749). France Int Dig Health Legis; 1994; 45(4):496-7. PubMed ID: 11660850 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The use of placebos in randomized clinical trials. Levine RJ; Schafer A IRB; 1985; 7(2):1-6. PubMed ID: 11649622 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Regulating research on the terminally ill: a proposal for heightened safeguards. Addicott DC J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1999; 15(2):479-524. PubMed ID: 10394764 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]