BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7558955)

  • 1. Treatment planning optimization for multiple arcs stereotactic radiosurgery using a linear accelerator.
    Lam CF; Zhu JG; Fenn JO; Jenrette JM
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 Oct; 33(3):647-57. PubMed ID: 7558955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Single isocenter treatment planning for homogeneous dose delivery to nonspherical targets in multiarc linear accelerator radiosurgery.
    Luxton G; Jozsef G
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 Feb; 31(3):635-43. PubMed ID: 7852130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An efficient method for small field treatment dose calculation for stereotactic radiosurgery using a LINAC.
    Lam CF; Zhu JG
    Med Phys; 1998 May; 25(5):676-82. PubMed ID: 9608478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dynamic collimator optimization compared with fixed collimator angle in arc-based stereotactic radiotherapy: a dosimetric analysis.
    Lee CM; Watson GA; Leavitt DD
    Neurosurg Focus; 2005 Jul; 19(1):E12. PubMed ID: 16078815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of static conformal field with multiple noncoplanar arc techniques for stereotactic radiosurgery or stereotactic radiotherapy.
    Hamilton RJ; Kuchnir FT; Sweeney P; Rubin SJ; Dujovny M; Pelizzari CA; Chen GT
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 Dec; 33(5):1221-8. PubMed ID: 7493846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Treatment planning optimization by conjugate gradients and simulated annealing methods in stereotactic radiosurgery.
    Gibon D; Rousseau J; Castelain B; Blond S; Vasseur C; Marchandise X
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 Aug; 33(1):201-10. PubMed ID: 7642420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical treatment planning optimization by Powell's method for gamma unit treatment system.
    Yan Y; Shu H; Bao X; Luo L; Bai Y
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Aug; 39(1):247-54. PubMed ID: 9300760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dosimetric comparison of stereotactic radiosurgery to intensity modulated radiotherapy.
    Kramer BA; Wazer DE; Engler MJ; Tsai JS; Ling MN
    Radiat Oncol Investig; 1998; 6(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 9503486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimized beam planning for linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiosurgery.
    Lu HM; Kooy HM; Leber ZH; Ledoux RJ
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Dec; 39(5):1183-9. PubMed ID: 9392561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radiation-induced changes of brain tissue after radiosurgery in patients with arteriovenous malformations: correlation with dose distribution parameters.
    Levegrün S; Hof H; Essig M; Schlegel W; Debus J
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Jul; 59(3):796-808. PubMed ID: 15183483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Conformity of LINAC-based stereotactic radiosurgery using dynamic conformal arcs and micro-multileaf collimator.
    Hazard LJ; Wang B; Skidmore TB; Chern SS; Salter BJ; Jensen RL; Shrieve DC
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Feb; 73(2):562-70. PubMed ID: 18565688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A geometrically based method of step and shoot stereotactic radiosurgery with a miniature multileaf collimator.
    St John TJ; Wagner TH; Bova FJ; Friedman WA; Meeks SL
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jul; 50(14):3263-76. PubMed ID: 16177508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Stereotactic radiosurgery using a linear accelerator (LINAC): simulation and positioning].
    Takayama M; Nakamura M; Ikezaki H; Ikeda I; Kusuda J; Furuya Y; Hara M; Saito I
    No Shinkei Geka; 1995 Mar; 23(3):223-8. PubMed ID: 7700490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The associated targets methodology and the multi-isocenters radiosurgery treatment planning system Artemis-3D.
    Lefkopoulos D; Schlienger M; Merienne L; Levrier M; Touboul E
    Bull Cancer Radiother; 1994; 81(2):111-25. PubMed ID: 7702892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does intensity-modulated stereotactic radiotherapy achieve superior target conformity than conventional stereotactic radiotherapy in different intracranial tumours?
    Sharma SD; Jalali R; Phurailatpam RD; Gupta T
    Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2009 Jun; 21(5):408-16. PubMed ID: 19268555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stereotactic radiotherapy for treatment of cavernous sinus meningiomas.
    Selch MT; Ahn E; Laskari A; Lee SP; Agazaryan N; Solberg TD; Cabatan-Awang C; Frighetto L; Desalles AA
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 May; 59(1):101-11. PubMed ID: 15093905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Radiosurgery of small skull-base lesions. No advantage for intensity-modulated stereotactic radiosurgery versus conformal arc technique.
    Ernst-Stecken A; Lambrecht U; Ganslandt O; Mueller R; Fahlbusch R; Sauer R; Grabenbauer G
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2005 May; 181(5):336-44. PubMed ID: 15900431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of IMRT and leaf width on stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver and lung lesions.
    Dvorak P; Georg D; Bogner J; Kroupa B; Dieckmann K; Pötter R
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Apr; 61(5):1572-81. PubMed ID: 15817364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of collimator size on three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy of the cyberknife.
    Hamamoto Y; Manabe T; Nishizaki O; Takahashi T; Isshiki N; Murayama S; Nishina K; Umeda M
    Radiat Med; 2004; 22(6):442-8. PubMed ID: 15648464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dynamic arc radiosurgery field shaping: a comparison with static field conformal and noncoplanar circular arcs.
    Solberg TD; Boedeker KL; Fogg R; Selch MT; DeSalles AA
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Apr; 49(5):1481-91. PubMed ID: 11286857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.