These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7560312)

  • 1. Factors influencing flow-induced signal loss in MR angiography: an in vitro study.
    Fürst G; Hofer M; Sitzer M; Kahn T; Müller E; Mödder U
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1995; 19(5):692-9. PubMed ID: 7560312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Delineation of simulated vascular stenosis with Gd-DTPA-enhanced 3D gradient echo MR angiography: an experimental study.
    Mitsuzaki K; Yamashita Y; Onomichi M; Tsuchigame T; Takahashi M
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2000; 24(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 10667664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can FLAIR hyperintense vessel (FHV) signs be influenced by varying MR parameters and flow velocities? A flow phantom analysis.
    Ahn SJ; Lee KY; Ahn SS; Suh H; Kim BS; Lee SK
    Acta Radiol; 2016 May; 57(5):580-6. PubMed ID: 26124459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Turbulent fluctuation velocity: the most significant determinant of signal loss in stenotic vessels.
    Oshinski JN; Ku DN; Pettigrew RI
    Magn Reson Med; 1995 Feb; 33(2):193-9. PubMed ID: 7707909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vitro model of arterial stenosis: correlation of MR signal dephasing and trans-stenotic pressure gradients.
    Mustert BR; Williams DM; Prince MR
    Magn Reson Imaging; 1998 Apr; 16(3):301-10. PubMed ID: 9621971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nonenhanced methods for lower-extremity MRA: a phantom study examining the effects of stenosis and pathologic flow waveforms at 1.5T.
    Offerman EJ; Hodnett PA; Edelman RR; Koktzoglou I
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Feb; 33(2):401-8. PubMed ID: 21274982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Experimental studies on magnetic resonance tomographic and magnetic resonance angiographic imaging of poststenotic flow patterns].
    Krug B; Kugel H; Friedmann G; Bunke J; van Dijk P; Schmidt R; Hirche HJ
    Rofo; 1992 May; 156(5):475-81. PubMed ID: 1596553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stenosis quantification from post-stenotic signal loss in phase-contrast MRA datasets of flow phantoms and renal arteries.
    Westenberg JJ; van der Geest RJ; Wasser MN; Doornbos J; Pattynama PM; de Roos A; Vanderschoot J; Reiber JH
    Int J Card Imaging; 1999 Dec; 15(6):483-93. PubMed ID: 10768743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Venous saturation slab causes overestimation of stenosis length in two-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography.
    Wikström J; Bjornerud A; McGill S; Johansson L
    Acta Radiol; 2009 Jan; 50(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 19052937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Objective stenosis quantification from post-stenotic signal loss in phase-contrast magnetic resonance angiographic datasets of flow phantoms and renal arteries.
    Westenberg JJ; van der Geest RJ; Wasser MN; Doornbos J; Pattynama PM; de Roos A; Vanderschoot J; Reiber JH
    Magn Reson Imaging; 1998 Apr; 16(3):249-60. PubMed ID: 9621966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Poststenotic signal loss in MR angiography: effects of echo time, flow compensation, and fractional echo.
    Evans AJ; Richardson DB; Tien R; MacFall JR; Hedlund LW; Heinz ER; Boyko O; Sostman HD
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1993; 14(3):721-9. PubMed ID: 8517365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The accuracy of magnetic resonance phase velocity measurements in stenotic flow.
    Siegel JM; Oshinski JN; Pettigrew RI; Ku DN
    J Biomech; 1996 Dec; 29(12):1665-72. PubMed ID: 8945670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Diagnosis of renal artery stenosis with magnetic resonance angiography and stenosis quantification].
    Marchand B; Hernandez-Hoyos M; Orkisz M; Douek P
    J Mal Vasc; 2000 Dec; 25(5):312-320. PubMed ID: 11148391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reduction of flow-related signal loss in flow-compensated 3D TOF MR angiography, using variable echo time (3D TOF-VTE).
    Jeong EK; Parker DL; Tsuruda JS; Won JY
    Magn Reson Med; 2002 Oct; 48(4):667-76. PubMed ID: 12353284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of flow through simulated vascular stenoses with gradient echo magnetic resonance imaging.
    Podolak MJ; Hedlund LW; Evans AJ; Herfkens RJ
    Invest Radiol; 1989 Mar; 24(3):184-9. PubMed ID: 2753632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Velocity encoding with the slice select refocusing gradient for faster imaging and reduced chemical shift-induced phase errors.
    Middione MJ; Thompson RB; Ennis DB
    Magn Reson Med; 2014 Jun; 71(6):2014-23. PubMed ID: 23836543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Doppler velocity ratio measurements evaluated in a phantom model of multiple arterial disease.
    Allard L; Cloutier G; Durand LG
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1995; 21(4):471-80. PubMed ID: 7571140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Flow-induced signal misallocation artifacts in two-point fat-water chemical shift MRI.
    Rahimi MS; Holmes JH; Wang K; Reeder SB; Korosec FR
    Magn Reson Med; 2015 May; 73(5):1926-31. PubMed ID: 24911325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Poststenotic flow in MRT: phantom measurements using spin-echo and gradient-echo sequences].
    Spielmann RP; Thiele F; Heller M; Bücheler E
    Digitale Bilddiagn; 1989 Jun; 9(2):55-8. PubMed ID: 2752673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Artifacts and signal loss due to flow in the presence of B(o) inhomogeneity.
    Drangova M; Pelc NJ
    Magn Reson Med; 1996 Jan; 35(1):126-30. PubMed ID: 8771030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.