These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 756067)

  • 1. The validity of the derived cochlear nerve and brainstem evoked responses of the human auditory system.
    Parker DJ; Thornton AR
    Scand Audiol; 1978; 7(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 756067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Frequency specific components of the cochlear nerve and brainstem evoked responses of the human auditory system.
    Parker DJ; Thornton AR
    Scand Audiol; 1978; 7(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 756068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cochlear travelling wave velocities calculated from the derived components of the cochlear nerve and brainstem evoked responses of the human auditory system.
    Parker DJ; Thornton AR
    Scand Audiol; 1978; 7(2):67-70. PubMed ID: 756072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Derived cochlear nerve and brainstem evoked responses of the human auditory system. The effect of masking in the derived band.
    Parker DJ; Thornton AR
    Scand Audiol; 1978; 7(2):73-80. PubMed ID: 756073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Auditory evoked potentials recorded from the cochlear nucleus and its vicinity in man.
    Møller AR; Jannetta PJ
    J Neurosurg; 1983 Dec; 59(6):1013-8. PubMed ID: 6631494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Location-specific components of the gross cochlear action potential: an assessment of the validity of the high-pass masking technique by cochlear nerve fibre recording in the cat.
    Evans EF; Elberling C
    Audiology; 1982; 21(3):204-27. PubMed ID: 7092725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of broadband noise on the human brain-stem auditory evoked response. IV. Additivity of forward-masking and rate-induced wave V latency shifts.
    Burkard R; Hecox KE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Apr; 81(4):1064-72. PubMed ID: 3571722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Frequency specificity of chirp-evoked auditory brainstem responses.
    Wegner O; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Mar; 111(3):1318-29. PubMed ID: 11931309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of broadband noise on the human brain-stem auditory evoked response. III. Anatomic locus.
    Burkard R; Hecox KE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Apr; 81(4):1050-63. PubMed ID: 3571721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Forward masking of auditory nerve and brainstem responses using high-pass noise maskers.
    Kramer SJ; Teas DC
    Hear Res; 1982 Dec; 8(3):317-37. PubMed ID: 7153185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Frequency information in the auditory brainstem response evoked by tonal transients.
    Helfer TM; Gerken GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Dec; 74(6):1747-51. PubMed ID: 6655133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electrophysiologic and behavioral outcomes of cochlear implantation in children with auditory nerve hypoplasia.
    Valero J; Blaser S; Papsin BC; James AL; Gordon KA
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(1):3-18. PubMed ID: 21750462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Deterioration of auditory evoked potentials during cerebellopontine angle manipulations. An interpretation based on an experimental model in dogs.
    Sekiya T; Iwabuchi T; Kamata S; Ishida T
    J Neurosurg; 1985 Oct; 63(4):598-607. PubMed ID: 3875697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Frequency specificity of the auditory brainstem responses in the cat.
    Mair IW; Laukli E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1985; 99(3-4):377-83. PubMed ID: 4013727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Current distributions in the cat cochlea: a modelling and electrophysiological study.
    O'Leary SJ; Black RC; Clark GM
    Hear Res; 1985 Jun; 18(3):273-81. PubMed ID: 3840160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Auditory development in the absence of hearing in infancy.
    Gordon KA; Valero J; Jewell SF; Ahn J; Papsin BC
    Neuroreport; 2010 Feb; 21(3):163-7. PubMed ID: 20042902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Frequency specificity of human auditory brainstem responses as revealed by pure-tone masking profiles.
    Folsom RC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Mar; 75(3):919-24. PubMed ID: 6707321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An evoked potential study of the developmental time course of the auditory nerve and brainstem in children using cochlear implants.
    Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
    Audiol Neurootol; 2006; 11(1):7-23. PubMed ID: 16219994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of cerebellar retractions on the cochlear nerve: an experimental study on rhesus monkeys.
    Sekiya T; Møller AR
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 1988; 90(1-2):45-52. PubMed ID: 3257838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intracranially recorded auditory nerve response in man. New interpretations of BSER.
    Møller AR; Jannetta P; Møller MB
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1982 Feb; 108(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 7059317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.