96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7560731)
1. The reliability of interpretation of photoscreening results with the off PS-100 in Headstart preschool children.
Lewis RC; Marsh-Tootle WL
J Am Optom Assoc; 1995 Jul; 66(7):429-34. PubMed ID: 7560731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Photoscreening for amblyogenic factors by public health personnel: the Eyecor Camera System.
Enzenauer RW; Freeman HL; Larson MR; Williams TL
Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2000 Mar; 7(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 10652167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The efficacy of photoscreening for amblyopiagenic factors in a high risk population.
Enzenauer RW
Binocul Vis Strabismus Q; 2003; 18(4):233-40. PubMed ID: 14653776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Screening for amblyopia in preverbal children with photoscreening photographs: IV. Interobserver variability in photograph grading: origin and method of reduction.
Kim AH; Chen J; Ottar-Pfeifer W; Lengauer B; Holgado S; Stager DR; Parks MM; Beauchamp GR; Scott W; Marsh MJ; Tong PY
Binocul Vis Strabismus Q; 2005; 20(2):71-80. PubMed ID: 16042536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Alaska Blind Child Discovery project: rationale, methods and results of 4000 screenings.
Arnold RW; Gionet EG; Jastrzebski AI; Kovtoun TA; Machida CJ; Armitage MD; Coon LJ
Alaska Med; 2000; 42(3):58-72. PubMed ID: 11042938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Photoscreening for early detection of amblyogenic eye changes].
Schworm HD; Kau C; Reindl B; Horstmann S; Dollinger B; Boergen KP
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1997 Mar; 210(3):158-64. PubMed ID: 9206748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Amblyopia detection by camera: Gateway to portable, inexpensive vision screening (calibration and validation of inexpensive, pocket-sized photoscreeners).
Arnold RW; Arnold AW; Stark L; Arnold KK; Leman R; Armitage MD
Alaska Med; 2004; 46(3):63-72. PubMed ID: 15839597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pediatric photoscreening for strabismus and refractive errors in a high-risk population.
Simons BD; Siatkowski RM; Schiffman JC; Berry BE; Flynn JT
Ophthalmology; 1999 Jun; 106(6):1073-80. PubMed ID: 10366073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Efficiency of a video-autorefractometer used as a screening device for amblyogenic factors.
Schimitzek T; Haase W
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Sep; 240(9):710-6. PubMed ID: 12271366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Practical community photoscreening in very young children.
Longmuir SQ; Boese EA; Pfeifer W; Zimmerman B; Short L; Scott WE
Pediatrics; 2013 Mar; 131(3):e764-9. PubMed ID: 23400603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Nine-year results of a volunteer lay network photoscreening program of 147 809 children using a photoscreener in Iowa.
Longmuir SQ; Pfeifer W; Leon A; Olson RJ; Short L; Scott WE
Ophthalmology; 2010 Oct; 117(10):1869-75. PubMed ID: 20656350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Screening for amblyogenic risk factors using the PlusoptiX S04 photoscreener on the indigent population of Honduras.
Matta NS; Singman EL; McCarus C; Matta E; Silbert DI
Ophthalmology; 2010 Sep; 117(9):1848-50. PubMed ID: 20472292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Preschool vision screening using the MTI-Photoscreener.
Berry BE; Simons BD; Siatkowski RM; Schiffman JC; Flynn JT; Duthie MJ
Pediatr Nurs; 2001; 27(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 12025144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of preschool vision screening tests as administered by licensed eye care professionals in the Vision In Preschoolers Study.
Schmidt P; Maguire M; Dobson V; Quinn G; Ciner E; Cyert L; Kulp MT; Moore B; Orel-Bixler D; Redford M; Ying GS;
Ophthalmology; 2004 Apr; 111(4):637-50. PubMed ID: 15051194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of developmentally-at-risk status on the reliability of the iScreen® photorefractive device in young children.
Kerr NC; Somes G; Enzenauer RW
Am Orthopt J; 2011; 61():117-23. PubMed ID: 21856879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of computer-photoscreening with non-cycloplegic retinoscopy for amblyopiogenic risk factors in children.
Guo X; Jia X; Guo L; Xiao X; Shen H; Li S; Zhang Q
Chin Med J (Engl); 2000 Nov; 113(11):1007-10. PubMed ID: 11776113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of photoscreening techniques for amblyogenic factors in children.
Kennedy RA; Sheps SB
Can J Ophthalmol; 1989 Oct; 24(6):259-64. PubMed ID: 2692792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Polaroid photoscreening for amblyogenic factors. An improved methodology.
Freedman HL; Preston KL
Ophthalmology; 1992 Dec; 99(12):1785-95. PubMed ID: 1480393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The cost and yield of photoscreening: impact of photoscreening on overall pediatric ophthalmic costs.
Arnold RW; Armitage MD; Gionet EG; Balinger A; Kovtoun TA; Machida C; Coon LJ
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2005; 42(2):103-11. PubMed ID: 15825747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the iScreen and the MTI photoscreeners for the detection of amblyopia risk factors in children.
Silbert DI; Arnold RW; Matta NS
J AAPOS; 2013 Feb; 17(1):34-7. PubMed ID: 23415034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
