133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7561575)
61. Predictors of success of semen cryopreservation in chickens.
Blesbois E; Grasseau I; Seigneurin F; Mignon-Grasteau S; Saint Jalme M; Mialon-Richard MM
Theriogenology; 2008 Jan; 69(2):252-61. PubMed ID: 17977587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Pellet-freezing of Damascus goat semen in a chemically defined extender.
Khalifa TA; El-Saidy BE
Anim Reprod Sci; 2006 Jul; 93(3-4):303-15. PubMed ID: 16169690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Hydrostatic pressure pre-treatment affects the protein profile of boar sperm before and after freezing-thawing.
Huang SY; Pribenszky C; Kuo YH; Teng SH; Chen YH; Chung MT; Chiu YF
Anim Reprod Sci; 2009 May; 112(1-2):136-49. PubMed ID: 18538515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. The effect of straw size, freezing rate and thawing rate upon post-thaw quality of dog semen.
Nöthling JO; Shuttleworth R
Theriogenology; 2005 Mar; 63(5):1469-80. PubMed ID: 15725452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Effects of glutamine on post-thaw motility of stallion spermatozoa: an approach of the mechanism of action at spermatozoa level.
Khlifaoui M; Battut I; Bruyas JF; Chatagnon G; Trimeche A; Tainturier D
Theriogenology; 2005 Jan; 63(1):138-49. PubMed ID: 15589280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Semen cryopreservation for men banking for oligospermia, cancers, and other pathologies: prediction of post-thaw outcome using basal semen quality.
Degl'Innocenti S; Filimberti E; Magini A; Krausz C; Lombardi G; Fino MG; Rastrelli G; Maggi M; Baldi E
Fertil Steril; 2013 Dec; 100(6):1555-63.e1-3. PubMed ID: 24034937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. [Impact of seasonal variation on pre- and post-thaw donor semen parameters].
Zhang XZ; Yao KS
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2010 Jul; 16(7):619-22. PubMed ID: 20873596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Evidence for increased lipid peroxidative damage and loss of superoxide dismutase activity as a mode of sublethal cryodamage to human sperm during cryopreservation.
Alvarez JG; Storey BT
J Androl; 1992; 13(3):232-41. PubMed ID: 1601742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Comparison of post-thaw sperm motility after freezing in liquid nitrogen with protective media of either glycerol or glycerol-egg-yolk-citrate.
Phillip M; Hermoni D; Potashnik G
Int J Fertil; 1983; 28(3):156-60. PubMed ID: 6140234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. [Pre-freezing equilibration improves post-thaw human semen parameters].
Wang YN; Zou SS; Xiao Q; Liu Y; Cao XR; Li Z; Hu HL
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2013 Oct; 19(10):886-9. PubMed ID: 24218940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Is it possible to use the hypoosmotic swelling test as criteria for "freezeability" of human semen in an AID program?
Volpes A; Sammartano F; Coffaro F; Guida S; Scaglione P; Allegra A
Acta Eur Fertil; 1992; 23(4):191-4. PubMed ID: 1343476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Poor hypo-osmotic swelling test results from cryopreserved sperm despite preservation of sperm motility.
Check ML; Check JH
Arch Androl; 1991; 26(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 2009029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. High levels of oxidation-reduction potential in frozen-thawed human semen are significantly correlated with poor post-thaw sperm quality.
Saleh R; Elsuity M; Henkel R; Agarwal A
Andrologia; 2020 Jul; 52(6):e13608. PubMed ID: 32352588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Human sperm cryopreservation in cancer patients: Links with deprivation and mortality.
Dearing CG; Jayasena CN; Lindsay KS
Cryobiology; 2017 Dec; 79():9-13. PubMed ID: 29031884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Optimizing human semen cryopreservation by reducing test vial volume and repetitive test vial sampling.
Jensen CF; Ohl DA; Parker WR; da Rocha AM; Keller LM; Schuster TG; Sonksen J; Smith GD
Fertil Steril; 2015 Mar; 103(3):640-6.e1. PubMed ID: 25585506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Long-term sperm cryopreservation does not affect post-thaw survival rates.
Pariz JR; Monteiro RAC; Hallak J
JBRA Assist Reprod; 2020 Jan; 24(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 31689041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Suitability of the hypo-osmotic swelling test for assessing the viability of cryopreserved sperm.
Esteves SC; Sharma RK; Thomas AJ; Agarwal A
Fertil Steril; 1996 Nov; 66(5):798-804. PubMed ID: 8893688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Application of multivariate cluster, discriminate function, and stepwise regression analyses to variable selection and predictive modeling of sperm cryosurvival.
Davis RO; Drobnis EZ; Overstreet JW
Fertil Steril; 1995 May; 63(5):1051-7. PubMed ID: 7720917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. A comparison of time, temperature, and refreezing variables on frozen sperm motility recovery.
Leffler KS; Walters CA
Fertil Steril; 1996 Feb; 65(2):272-4. PubMed ID: 8566247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Corrected cholesterol, a novel marker for predicting semen post-thaw quality: a pilot study.
Dearing CG; Lindsay KS
Hum Fertil (Camb); 2019 Jun; 22(2):94-103. PubMed ID: 28960100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
