These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7561657)

  • 21. Sealing ability of MTA, Super EBA, Vitremer and amalgam as root-end filling materials.
    Pereira CL; Cenci MS; Demarco FF
    Braz Oral Res; 2004; 18(4):317-21. PubMed ID: 16089263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Marginal microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations: effect of using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives.
    Khoroushi M; Karvandi TM; Kamali B; Mazaheri H
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 23059577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Microleakage of endodontic access cavities restored with composites.
    Barkhordar RA; Kempler D
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 1997 Mar; 25(3):215-8. PubMed ID: 9452662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Histologic Evaluation of Artificial Floors Under MTA and Nano-Filled Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Used to Repair Furcation Perforations in Dogs.
    Aladimi AA; Alhadainy HA; Farag A; Azma NA; Torad F; Abdulrab S
    Eur Endod J; 2020; 5(2):138-144. PubMed ID: 32766525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. In vitro marginal leakage of cervical composite restorations lined with a light-cured glass ionomer.
    Sidhu SK; Henderson LJ
    Oper Dent; 1992; 17(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 1437685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations.
    Toledano M; Osorio E; Osorio R; García-Godoy F
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 May; 81(5):610-5. PubMed ID: 10220667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The influence of orifice sealing with various filling materials on coronal leakage.
    Shindo K; Kakuma Y; Ishikawa H; Kobayashi C; Suda H
    Dent Mater J; 2004 Sep; 23(3):419-23. PubMed ID: 15510875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of materials and techniques for restoration of erosion areas.
    Monteiro S; Sigurjons H; Swartz ML; Phillips RW; Rhodes BF
    J Prosthet Dent; 1986 Apr; 55(4):434-42. PubMed ID: 2937915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of matrix placement on furcation perforation repair.
    Jantarat J; Dashper SG; Messer HH
    J Endod; 1999 Mar; 25(3):192-6. PubMed ID: 10321186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Short-term evaluation of the pulpo-dentin complex response to a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement and a bonding agent applied in deep cavities.
    Costa CA; Giro EM; do Nascimento AB; Teixeira HM; Hebling J
    Dent Mater; 2003 Dec; 19(8):739-46. PubMed ID: 14511732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Microleakage of composite resin and glass ionomer cement restorations in retentive and nonretentive cervical cavity preparations.
    Kaplan I; Mincer HH; Harris EF; Cloyd JS
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Oct; 68(4):616-23. PubMed ID: 1403938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Microleakage between glass-ionomer cement and composite resins.
    Chan KC
    J Esthet Dent; 1992; 4(4):114-6. PubMed ID: 1389358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Does pretreatment of cavities effectively promote good marginal adaptation of glass-ionomer cements?
    Arweiler NB; Auschill TM; Reich E
    J Adhes Dent; 2000; 2(4):289-95. PubMed ID: 11317375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of thermal and mechanical load cycling on the marginal integrity of Class II resin composite restorations.
    Davidson CL; Abdalla AI
    Am J Dent; 1993 Feb; 6(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 8329161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Biocompatibility of a flowable composite bonded with a self-etching adhesive compared with a glass lonomer cement and a high copper amalgam.
    Shimada Y; Seki Y; Sasafuchi Y; Arakawa M; Burrow MF; Otsuki M; Tagami J
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 14753328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Marginal leakage in class V composite resin restorations with glass ionomer liners in vitro.
    Mathis RS; DeWald JP; Moody CR; Ferracane JL
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 May; 63(5):522-5. PubMed ID: 2338665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Fluoride release and caries inhibition associated with a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement at varying fluoride loading doses.
    Donly KJ; Segura A
    Am J Dent; 2002 Feb; 15(1):8-10. PubMed ID: 12074234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Influence of dentin conditioning on bond strength of light-cured ionomer restorative materials and polyacid-modified composite resins.
    Buchalla W; Attin T; Hellwig E
    J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(4):81-4. PubMed ID: 9238882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of altering the type of enamel conditioner on the shear bond strength of a resin-reinforced glass ionomer adhesive.
    Bishara SE; Vonwald L; Laffoon JF; Jakobsen JR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Sep; 118(3):288-94. PubMed ID: 10982929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of Sealing Potential of Different Repair Materials in Furcation Perforations Using Dye Penetration: An
    Mohan D; Singh AK; Kuriakose F; Malik R; Joy J; John D
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Jan; 22(1):80-83. PubMed ID: 34002714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.