264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7561658)
1. A comparison of root canal preparations using Ni-Ti hand, Ni-Ti engine-driven, and K-Flex endodontic instruments.
Glossen CR; Haller RH; Dove SB; del Rio CE
J Endod; 1995 Mar; 21(3):146-51. PubMed ID: 7561658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of nickel-titanium and stainless steel hand-file instrumentation using computed tomography.
Gambill JM; Alder M; del Rio CE
J Endod; 1996 Jul; 22(7):369-75. PubMed ID: 8935064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The quality of apical canal preparation using hand and rotary instruments with specific criteria for enlargement based on initial apical file size.
Tan BT; Messer HH
J Endod; 2002 Sep; 28(9):658-64. PubMed ID: 12236311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Analysis of Ni-Ti versus stainless steel instrumentation in resin simulated canals.
Coleman CL; Svec TA
J Endod; 1997 Apr; 23(4):232-5. PubMed ID: 9594772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A reconstructed computerized tomographic comparison of Ni-Ti rotary GT files versus traditional instruments in canals shaped by novice operators.
Gluskin AH; Brown DC; Buchanan LS
Int Endod J; 2001 Sep; 34(6):476-84. PubMed ID: 11556516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing apical preparations of root canals shaped by nickel-titanium rotary instruments and nickel-titanium hand instruments.
Deplazes P; Peters O; Barbakow F
J Endod; 2001 Mar; 27(3):196-202. PubMed ID: 11487151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparative study of root canal preparation using Profile .04 and Lightspeed rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
Versümer J; Hülsmann M; Schäfers F
Int Endod J; 2002 Jan; 35(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 11853237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of canal centering ability of four instrumentation techniques.
Short JA; Morgan LA; Baumgartner JC
J Endod; 1997 Aug; 23(8):503-7. PubMed ID: 9587320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analysis of nickel-titanium versus stainless steel instrumentation by means of direct digital imaging.
Coleman CL; Svec TA; Rieger MR; Suchina JA; Wang MM; Glickman GN
J Endod; 1996 Nov; 22(11):603-7. PubMed ID: 9198416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of the shaping characteristics of two nickel-titanium endodontic hand instruments.
Dobó-Nagy C; Serbán T; Szabó J; Nagy G; Madléna M
Int Endod J; 2002 Mar; 35(3):283-8. PubMed ID: 11985681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficacy of two Ni-Ti systems and hand files for removing gutta-percha from root canals.
Mollo A; Botti G; Prinicipi Goldoni N; Randellini E; Paragliola R; Chazine M; Ounsi HF; Grandini S
Int Endod J; 2012 Jan; 45(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 21848894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of nickel-titanium engine-driven instrument rotational speed on root canal morphology.
Poulsen WB; Dove SB; del Rio CE
J Endod; 1995 Dec; 21(12):609-12. PubMed ID: 8596082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Canal preparation with Hero 642 rotary Ni-Ti instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-file assessed using computed tomography.
Taşdemir T; Aydemir H; Inan U; Unal O
Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):402-8. PubMed ID: 15910476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Canal wall planning by engine-driven nickel-titanium instruments, compared with stainless-steel hand instrumentation.
Tucker DM; Wenckus CS; Bentkover SK
J Endod; 1997 Mar; 23(3):170-3. PubMed ID: 9594758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative study of six rotary nickel-titanium systems and hand instrumentation for root canal preparation.
Guelzow A; Stamm O; Martus P; Kielbassa AM
Int Endod J; 2005 Oct; 38(10):743-52. PubMed ID: 16164689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of instrument-centering ability within the root canal for three contemporary instrumentation techniques.
Song YL; Bian Z; Fan B; Fan MW; Gutmann JL; Peng B
Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 15056353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ex vivo study on root canal instrumentation of two rotary nickel-titanium systems in comparison to stainless steel hand instruments.
Vaudt J; Bitter K; Neumann K; Kielbassa AM
Int Endod J; 2009 Jan; 42(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 19125977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of stainless steel and nickel-titanium K-files in curved root canals.
Chan AW; Cheung GS
Int Endod J; 1996 Nov; 29(6):370-5. PubMed ID: 10332236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of a new nickel-titanium system to create the glide path in root canal preparation of curved canals.
D'Amario M; Baldi M; Petricca R; De Angelis F; El Abed R; D'Arcangelo C
J Endod; 2013 Dec; 39(12):1581-4. PubMed ID: 24238451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of stainless steel hand and rotary nickel-titanium instrumentation using a silicone impression technique.
Chen JL; Messer HH
Aust Dent J; 2002 Mar; 47(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 12035951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
