610 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7563205)
1. Mammographic features and breast cancer risk: effects with time, age, and menopause status.
Byrne C; Schairer C; Wolfe J; Parekh N; Salane M; Brinton LA; Hoover R; Haile R
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1995 Nov; 87(21):1622-9. PubMed ID: 7563205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mammographic parenchymal patterns and mode of detection: implications for the breast screening programme.
Sala E; Warren R; McCann J; Duffy S; Day N; Luben R
J Med Screen; 1998; 5(4):207-12. PubMed ID: 9934652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Relationship of mammographic parenchymal patterns with breast cancer risk factors and risk of breast cancer in a prospective study.
de Stavola BL; Gravelle IH; Wang DY; Allen DS; Bulbrook RD; Fentiman IS; Hayward JL; Chaudary MC
Int J Epidemiol; 1990 Jun; 19(2):247-54. PubMed ID: 2376431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Wolfe's parenchymal pattern and percentage of the breast with mammographic densities: redundant or complementary classifications?
Brisson J; Diorio C; Mâsse B
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2003 Aug; 12(8):728-32. PubMed ID: 12917203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Urinary estrogen metabolites and mammographic parenchymal patterns in postmenopausal women.
Riza E; dos Santos Silva I; De Stavola B; Bradlow HL; Sepkovic DW; Linos D; Linos A
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2001 Jun; 10(6):627-34. PubMed ID: 11401912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Risk of breast cancer and changes in mammographic parenchymal patterns over time.
Salminen TM; Saarenmaa IE; Heikkilä MM; Hakama M
Acta Oncol; 1998; 37(6):547-51. PubMed ID: 9860312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is a dense mammographic parenchymal pattern a contraindication to hormonal replacement therapy?
Salminen TM; Saarenmaa IE; Heikkilä MM; Hakama M
Acta Oncol; 2000; 39(8):969-72. PubMed ID: 11207004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Breast cancer screening by mammography in women aged under 50 years in Japan.
Morimoto T; Sasa M; Yamaguchi T; Kondo H; Akaiwa H; Sagara Y
Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(5C):3689-94. PubMed ID: 11268440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mammographic parenchymal patterns as an imaging marker of endogenous hormonal exposure: a preliminary study in a high-risk population.
Daye D; Keller B; Conant EF; Chen J; Schnall MD; Maidment AD; Kontos D
Acad Radiol; 2013 May; 20(5):635-46. PubMed ID: 23570938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of mammographic density and benign breast disease on breast cancer risk (United States).
Byrne C; Schairer C; Brinton LA; Wolfe J; Parekh N; Salane M; Carter C; Hoover R
Cancer Causes Control; 2001 Feb; 12(2):103-10. PubMed ID: 11246838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study.
Boyd NF; Byng JW; Jong RA; Fishell EK; Little LE; Miller AB; Lockwood GA; Tritchler DL; Yaffe MJ
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1995 May; 87(9):670-5. PubMed ID: 7752271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Association of the Interaction Between Mammographic Breast Density, Body Mass Index, and Menopausal Status With Breast Cancer Risk Among Korean Women.
Tran TXM; Moon SG; Kim S; Park B
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Dec; 4(12):e2139161. PubMed ID: 34940866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Size, node status and grade of breast tumours: association with mammographic parenchymal patterns.
Sala E; Solomon L; Warren R; McCann J; Duffy S; Luben R; Day N
Eur Radiol; 2000; 10(1):157-61. PubMed ID: 10663736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mammographic parenchymal patterns as indicators of breast cancer risk.
Saftlas AF; Wolfe JN; Hoover RN; Brinton LA; Schairer C; Salane M; Szklo M
Am J Epidemiol; 1989 Mar; 129(3):518-26. PubMed ID: 2916545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mammographic parenchymal patterns: a marker of breast cancer risk.
Oza AM; Boyd NF
Epidemiol Rev; 1993; 15(1):196-208. PubMed ID: 8405204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mammographic parenchymal features and breast cancer in the breast cancer detection demonstration project.
Brisson J; Morrison AS; Khalid N
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1988 Dec; 80(19):1534-40. PubMed ID: 3255294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects at two years of a low-fat, high-carbohydrate diet on radiologic features of the breast: results from a randomized trial. Canadian Diet and Breast Cancer Prevention Study Group.
Boyd NF; Greenberg C; Lockwood G; Little L; Martin L; Byng J; Yaffe M; Tritchler D
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1997 Apr; 89(7):488-96. PubMed ID: 9086005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mammographic density and structural features can individually and jointly contribute to breast cancer risk assessment in mammography screening: a case-control study.
Winkel RR; von Euler-Chelpin M; Nielsen M; Petersen K; Lillholm M; Nielsen MB; Lynge E; Uldall WY; Vejborg I
BMC Cancer; 2016 Jul; 16():414. PubMed ID: 27387546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Unfavourable change in mammographic patterns and the breast cancer risk factors.
Salminen TM; Saarenmaa IE; Heikkilä MM; Hakama M
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 1999 Sep; 57(2):165-73. PubMed ID: 10598043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A prospective study of the value of mammographic patterns as indicators of breast cancer risk in a screening experience.
Ciatto S; Zappa M
Eur J Radiol; 1993 Sep; 17(2):122-5. PubMed ID: 8223680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
