150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7563214)
1. Retrospective appraisal of the relationship between skin irritancy and contact sensitization potential.
Auton TR; Botham PA; Kimber I
J Toxicol Environ Health; 1995 Oct; 46(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 7563214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Skin irritation and sensitization: mechanisms and new approaches for risk assessment.
Basketter D; Darlenski R; Fluhr JW
Skin Pharmacol Physiol; 2008; 21(4):191-202. PubMed ID: 18509253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Rates of allergic sensitization and irritation to oxybenzone-containing sunscreen products: a quantitative meta-analysis of 64 exaggerated use studies.
Agin PP; Ruble K; Hermansky SJ; McCarthy TJ
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed; 2008 Aug; 24(4):211-7. PubMed ID: 18717962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Skin irritation and sensitization: mechanisms and new approaches for risk assessment. 1. Skin irritation.
Fluhr JW; Darlenski R; Angelova-Fischer I; Tsankov N; Basketter D
Skin Pharmacol Physiol; 2008; 21(3):124-35. PubMed ID: 18523410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Irritant contact dermatitis. Part II. Evaluation evaluation of skin irritation potential of chemicals].
Chomiczewska D; Kieć-Swierczyńska M; Krecisz B
Med Pr; 2009; 60(3):209-14. PubMed ID: 19746889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of electric arc furnace-processed steel slag for dermal corrosion, irritation, and sensitization from dermal contact.
Suh M; Troese MJ; Hall DA; Yasso B; Yzenas JJ; Proctor DM
J Appl Toxicol; 2014 Dec; 34(12):1418-25. PubMed ID: 24395402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sunscreen intolerance. Contact sensitization, photocontact sensitization, and irritancy of sunscreen agents.
Funk JO; Dromgoole SH; Maibach HI
Dermatol Clin; 1995 Apr; 13(2):473-81. PubMed ID: 7600718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does irritation potency contribute to the skin sensitization potency of contact allergens?
Basketter DA; Kan-King-Yu D; Dierkes P; Jowsey IR
Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2007; 26(4):279-86. PubMed ID: 18058302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Skin-sensitizing and irritant properties of propylene glycol.
Lessmann H; Schnuch A; Geier J; Uter W
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Nov; 53(5):247-59. PubMed ID: 16283903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relationship between 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene elicitation responses and individual irritant threshold.
Smith HR; Kelly DA; Young AR; Basketter DB; McFadden JP
Contact Dermatitis; 2002 Feb; 46(2):97-100. PubMed ID: 11918603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro and in vivo testing techniques for allergic contact dermatitis.
Gerberick GF; Sikorski EE
Am J Contact Dermat; 1998 Jun; 9(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 9601899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Skin sensitization potency of methyl methacrylate in the local lymph node assay: comparisons with guinea-pig data and human experience.
Betts CJ; Dearman RJ; Heylings JR; Kimber I; Basketter DA
Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Sep; 55(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 16918612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparative study of the sensitivity of the 3-induction and 9-induction Buehler test procedures for assessing skin sensitisation potential.
Botham P; Urtizberea M; Wiemann C; Manciaux X; Tilbury L; Vohr HW; Allen S; Carmichael NG; de Jouffrey S
Food Chem Toxicol; 2005 Jan; 43(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 15582197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Epidemiology of contact dermatitis: prevalence of sensitization to different allergens and associated factors].
Bordel-Gómez MT; Miranda-Romero A; Castrodeza-Sanz J
Actas Dermosifiliogr; 2010; 101(1):59-75. PubMed ID: 20109394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Retrospective evaluation of the consequence of alleged patch test sensitization.
Jensen CD; Paulsen E; Andersen KE
Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Jul; 55(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 16842551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A literature review of dermatotoxicity.
Ali N; Oehme FW
Vet Hum Toxicol; 1992 Oct; 34(5):428-37. PubMed ID: 1455613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of dermal and eye irritation and skin sensitization due to carbon nanotubes.
Ema M; Matsuda A; Kobayashi N; Naya M; Nakanishi J
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2011 Dec; 61(3):276-81. PubMed ID: 21893152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Guinea pig sensitization assays: an experimental comparison of three methods.
Modjtahedi BS; Fortenbach CR; Marsano JG; Gandhi AM; Staab R; Maibach HI
Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2011 Jun; 30(2):129-37. PubMed ID: 21265706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cumulative skin irritation test of sanitary pads in sensitive skin and normal skin population.
Farage MA; Maibach H
Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2007; 26(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 17464747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A review of the Buehler guinea pig skin sensitization test and its use in a risk assessment process for human skin sensitization.
Robinson MK; Nusair TL; Fletcher ER; Ritz HL
Toxicology; 1990 Apr; 61(2):91-107. PubMed ID: 2181736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
