BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7563286)

  • 1. An evaluation of instrumented tank rowing for objective assessment of rowing performance.
    Henry JC; Clark RR; McCabe RP; Vanderby R
    J Sports Sci; 1995 Jun; 13(3):199-206. PubMed ID: 7563286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prediction of 2000 m indoor rowing performance using a 30 s sprint and maximal oxygen uptake.
    Riechman SE; Zoeller RF; Balasekaran G; Goss FL; Robertson RJ
    J Sports Sci; 2002 Sep; 20(9):681-7. PubMed ID: 12200919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliability and discriminative ability of a modified Wingate rowing test in 12- to 18-year-old rowers.
    Mikulic P; Emersic D; Markovic G
    J Sports Sci; 2010 Nov; 28(13):1409-14. PubMed ID: 20960364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Force-velocity and power-velocity relationships during maximal short-term rowing ergometry.
    Sprague RC; Martin JC; Davidson CJ; Farrar RP
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2007 Feb; 39(2):358-64. PubMed ID: 17277601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Discriminant analysis of biomechanical differences between novice, good and elite rowers.
    Smith RM; Spinks WL
    J Sports Sci; 1995 Oct; 13(5):377-85. PubMed ID: 8558624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modification of the Wingate anaerobic power test for rowing: optimization of the resistance setting.
    Mandic S; Quinney HA; Bell GJ
    Int J Sports Med; 2004 Aug; 25(6):409-14. PubMed ID: 15346227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of anaerobic capacity in rowers using Wingate test on cycle and rowing ergometer.
    Klasnja A; Barak O; Popadić-Gaćesa J; Drapsin M; Knezević A; Grujić N
    Med Pregl; 2010; 63(9-10):620-3. PubMed ID: 21443056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Determinants of 2,000 m rowing ergometer performance in elite rowers.
    Ingham SA; Whyte GP; Jones K; Nevill AM
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2002 Dec; 88(3):243-6. PubMed ID: 12458367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Instrumentation of an ergometer to monitor the reliability of rowing performance.
    Macfarlane DJ; Edmond IM; Walmsley A
    J Sports Sci; 1997 Apr; 15(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 9258846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance and blood lactate on Gjessing and Concept II rowing ergometers.
    Lormes W; Buckwitz R; Rehbein H; Steinacker JM
    Int J Sports Med; 1993 Sep; 14 Suppl 1():S29-31. PubMed ID: 8262703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The prediction of power and efficiency during near-maximal rowing.
    Jensen RL; Freedson PS; Hamill J
    Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol; 1996; 73(1-2):98-104. PubMed ID: 8861676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Critical velocity: a predictor of 2000-m rowing ergometer performance in NCAA D1 female collegiate rowers.
    Kendall KL; Smith AE; Fukuda DH; Dwyer TR; Stout JR
    J Sports Sci; 2011 Jun; 29(9):945-50. PubMed ID: 21574097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Kinematic asymmetries of the lower limbs during ergometer rowing.
    Buckeridge E; Hislop S; Bull A; McGregor A
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2012 Nov; 44(11):2147-53. PubMed ID: 22677926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stroke power consistency and 2000 m rowing performance in varsity rowers.
    Shimoda M; Fukunaga T; Higuchi M; Kawakami Y
    Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2009 Feb; 19(1):83-6. PubMed ID: 18248542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Investigation of biomechanical factors affecting rowing performance.
    Baudouin A; Hawkins D
    J Biomech; 2004 Jul; 37(7):969-76. PubMed ID: 15165867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Peak force, velocity, and power during five and ten maximal rowing ergometer strokes by world class female and male rowers.
    Hartmann U; Mader A; Wasser K; Klauer I
    Int J Sports Med; 1993 Sep; 14 Suppl 1():S42-5. PubMed ID: 8262708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ergometer rowing with and without slides.
    Holsgaard-Larsen A; Jensen K
    Int J Sports Med; 2010 Dec; 31(12):870-4. PubMed ID: 20827655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Conconi test: a controversial concept for the determination of the anaerobic threshold in young rowers.
    Bourgois J; Vrijens J
    Int J Sports Med; 1998 Nov; 19(8):553-9. PubMed ID: 9877147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of energy expenditure during rowing and cycling ergometry.
    Hagerman FC; Lawrence RA; Mansfield MC
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1988 Oct; 20(5):479-88. PubMed ID: 3193864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Scaling concept II rowing ergometer performance for differences in body mass to better reflect rowing in water.
    Nevill AM; Beech C; Holder RL; Wyon M
    Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2010 Feb; 20(1):122-7. PubMed ID: 19210670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.