259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7564435)
21. Commissural dehiscence and pannus formation of porcine heart valve bioprostheses.
Kimura M; Iwakuma A; Morishige N; Nakamura K; Tachikawa Y; Shibano R; Iwahashi H; Zaitsu R; Motomura T; Takeuchi K; Tashiro T; Kitasato K
Artif Organs; 2003 Aug; 27(8):706-13. PubMed ID: 12911345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Bioprosthesis degeneration in the aortic and mitral valve position. Results and problems from the cardiosurgical viewpoint].
Antretter H; Cottogni M; Falbesoner C; Furtwängler W; Mair P; Falk M; Hutter J
Wien Med Wochenschr; 1993; 143(11):281-7. PubMed ID: 8212714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Long-term evaluation of the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis].
Takahara Y; Sudou Y; Murayama H; Nakamura T
Nihon Kyobu Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1995 Aug; 43(8):1097-102. PubMed ID: 7594841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Twenty-year clinical experience with porcine bioprostheses.
Fann JI; Miller DC; Moore KA; Mitchell RS; Oyer PE; Stinson EB; Robbins RC; Reitz BA; Shumway NE
Ann Thorac Surg; 1996 Nov; 62(5):1301-11; discussion 1311-2. PubMed ID: 8893561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Influence of completely supra-annular placement of bioprostheses on exercise hemodynamics in patients with a small aortic annulus.
Wagner IM; Eichinger WB; Bleiziffer S; Botzenhardt F; Gebauer I; Guenzinger R; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 May; 133(5):1234-41. PubMed ID: 17467435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Hancock II bioprosthesis: a glance at the microscope in mid-long-term explants.
Bottio T; Thiene G; Pettenazzo E; Ius P; Bortolotti U; Rizzoli G; Valfré C; Casarotto D; Valente M
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2003 Jul; 126(1):99-105. PubMed ID: 12878944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Carpentier-Edwards standard and supra-annular porcine bioprostheses: 10 year comparison of structural valve deterioration.
Jamieson WR; Burr LH; Tyers GF; Munro AI
J Heart Valve Dis; 1994 Jan; 3(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 8162218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Durability of pericardial versus porcine bioprosthetic heart valves.
Grunkemeier GL; Furnary AP; Wu Y; Wang L; Starr A
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Dec; 144(6):1381-6. PubMed ID: 23010581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprostheses. Comparison of standard and supra-annular prostheses at 7 years.
Jamieson WR; Tyers GF; Miyagishima RT; Germann E; Janusz MT; Ling H
Circulation; 1991 Nov; 84(5 Suppl):III145-52. PubMed ID: 1934404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Mechanical prosthesis is reasonable for mitral valve replacement in patients approximately 65 years of age.
Nishida T; Sonoda H; Oishi Y; Tanoue Y; Nakashima A; Shiokawa Y; Tominaga R
Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Nov; 96(5):1614-20. PubMed ID: 23891407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Time-related degeneration of Carpentier-Edwards bioprosthesis in mitral position].
Otaki M; Yamaguchi A; Iida H; Miki T; Fukushima Y; Minoji T; Tamura H; Kitamura N; Hayashi T
Nihon Kyobu Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Apr; 37(4):645-9. PubMed ID: 2768940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Carpentier-Edwards standard and supraannular porcine bioprostheses: comparison of technology.
Jamieson WR; Burr LH; Janusz MT; Munro AI; Hayden RI; Miyagishima RT; Ling H; Fradet GJ; Lichtenstein SV; Stewart KM
Ann Thorac Surg; 1999 Jan; 67(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 10086520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of Carpentier-Edwards pericardial and supraannular bioprostheses in aortic valve replacement.
Puvimanasinghe JP; Takkenberg JJ; Eijkemans MJ; van Herwerden LA; Jamieson WR; Grunkemeier GL; Habbema JD; Bogers AJ
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Mar; 29(3):374-9. PubMed ID: 16386920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Structural durability in Carpentier Edwards Standard bioprosthesis in the mitral position: a 20-year experience.
Corbineau H; Du Haut Cilly FB; Langanay T; Verhoye JP; Leguerrier A
J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Jul; 10(4):443-8. PubMed ID: 11499587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Morphological comparison of mitral and aortic bioprostheses explanted from the same patient for primary tissue failure.
Pansini S; Di Summa M; Galloni M; Gagliardotto P; Parisi F; Zattera G; Punta G; Girotto M; Cesarani F
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 1996 Jun; 37(3):291-4. PubMed ID: 8698766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Randomized, prospective assessment of bioprosthetic valve durability. Hancock versus Carpentier-Edwards valves.
Sarris GE; Robbins RC; Miller DC; Mitchell RS; Moore KA; Stinson EB; Oyer PE; Reitz BA; Shumway NE
Circulation; 1993 Nov; 88(5 Pt 2):II55-64. PubMed ID: 8222197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Pathology of the Pericarbon bovine pericardial xenograft implanted in humans.
Valente M; Ius P; Bortolotti U; Talenti E; Bottio T; Thiene G
J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Mar; 7(2):180-9. PubMed ID: 9587859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Porcine versus pericardial bioprostheses: eleven-year follow up of a prospective randomized trial.
Chaudhry MA; Raco L; Muriithi EW; Bernacca GM; Tolland MM; Wheatley DJ
J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 May; 9(3):429-37; discussion 437-8. PubMed ID: 10888102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Investigation of primary tissue failure in mitral bioprostheses].
Shimoyama Y; Wanibuchi Y; Suma H; Takayama T; Terada Y; Saito T; Furuta S
Nihon Kyobu Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1990 Apr; 38(4):590-5. PubMed ID: 2373892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Results of reoperation for primary tissue failure of porcine bioprostheses.
Bortolotti U; Milano A; Mazzucco A; Valfré C; Talenti E; Guerra F; Thiene G; Gallucci V
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Oct; 90(4):564-9. PubMed ID: 4046622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
