These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7565350)
1. Comparison of two methods for accurate measurement of modulation transfer functions of screen-film systems. Morishita J; Doi K; Bollen R; Bunch PC; Hoeschen D; Sirand-rey G; Sukenobu Y Med Phys; 1995 Feb; 22(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 7565350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validity of the line-pair bar-pattern method in the measurement of the modulation transfer function (MTF) in megavoltage imaging. Gopal A; Samant SS Med Phys; 2008 Jan; 35(1):270-9. PubMed ID: 18293582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Signal and noise in modulation transfer function determinations using the slit, wire, and edge techniques. Cunningham IA; Reid BK Med Phys; 1992; 19(4):1037-44. PubMed ID: 1518465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Describing the signal-transfer characteristics of asymmetrical radiographic screen-film systems. Van Metter R Med Phys; 1992; 19(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 1620058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. 6. MTFs of II-TV digital imaging systems. Fujita H; Doi K; Giger ML Med Phys; 1985; 12(6):713-20. PubMed ID: 4079861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Proportionality between Wiener spectra of quantum mottle and the squares of modulation transfer functions. Arimura H; Kubota H; Matsumoto M; Kanamori H Phys Med Biol; 1999 May; 44(5):1337-52. PubMed ID: 10368023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of imaging properties of a computed radiography system and screen-film systems. Sanada S; Doi K; Xu XW; Yin FF; Giger ML; MacMahon H Med Phys; 1991; 18(3):414-20. PubMed ID: 1870484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intercomparison of methods for image quality characterization. I. Modulation transfer function. Samei E; Ranger NT; Dobbins JT; Chen Y Med Phys; 2006 May; 33(5):1454-65. PubMed ID: 16752580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A method for determining the modulation transfer function from thick microwire profiles measured with x-ray microcomputed tomography. Nakaya Y; Kawata Y; Niki N; Umetatni K; Ohmatsu H; Moriyama N Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4347-64. PubMed ID: 22830768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of approaches and artefacts in the measurement of detector modulation transfer functions. Boothroyd CB; Kasama T; Dunin-Borkowski RE Ultramicroscopy; 2013 Jun; 129():18-29. PubMed ID: 23548973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Modulation transfer function of a finite scanning microdensitometer slit. Villafana T Med Phys; 1975; 2(5):251-4. PubMed ID: 1186630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Determining the MTF of medical imaging displays using edge techniques. Chawla AS; Roehrig H; Rodriguez JJ; Fan J J Digit Imaging; 2005 Dec; 18(4):296-310. PubMed ID: 16132485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. High-speed, single-screen/single-emulsion film systems: basic imaging properties and preliminary clinical applications. Higashida Y; Frank PH; Doi K Radiology; 1983 Nov; 149(2):571-7. PubMed ID: 6622705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Gamma camera MTFs from edge response function measurements. Logan KW; Hickey KA; Bull SR Med Phys; 1983; 10(3):361-4. PubMed ID: 6877184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of edge analysis techniques for the determination of the MTF of digital radiographic systems. Samei E; Buhr E; Granfors P; Vandenbroucke D; Wang X Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(15):3613-25. PubMed ID: 16030386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A method for measuring the presampled MTF of digital radiographic systems using an edge test device. Samei E; Flynn MJ; Reimann DA Med Phys; 1998 Jan; 25(1):102-13. PubMed ID: 9472832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An interlaboratory measurement of screen-film speed and average gradient according to ISO 9236-1. Buhr E; Bergmann D; Hoeschen D; Ailliet M; Sirand-Rey G; Gazzola C; Uras S Med Phys; 2000 Feb; 27(2):307-11. PubMed ID: 10718133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation of MTF measurement for digital mammography quality control. Carton AK; Vandenbroucke D; Struye L; Maidment AD; Kao YH; Albert M; Bosmans H; Marchal G Med Phys; 2005 Jun; 32(6):1684-95. PubMed ID: 16013727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accurate determination of CT point-spread-function with high precision. Kayugawa A; Ohkubo M; Wada S J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 Jul; 14(4):3905. PubMed ID: 23835372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An experimental comparison of detector performance for computed radiography systems. Samei E; Flynn MJ Med Phys; 2002 Apr; 29(4):447-59. PubMed ID: 11991117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]