These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. US radiation report fails to satisfy critics. Macilwain C Nature; 1995 Oct; 377(6549):470. PubMed ID: 7566133 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments. Reflections on a Presidential Commission. Faden R Hastings Cent Rep; 1996; 26(5):5-10. PubMed ID: 8891702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Proposed requirements for informed consent go beyond current federal regulations. Hum Res Rep; 1994 Jul; 9(7):1-3. PubMed ID: 11659879 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Special informed consent requirements are included in protocol review procedures. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1995 Jul; 10(7):1-2. PubMed ID: 11654274 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The National Bioethics Advisory Commission: bridging the gaps in human subjects research protection. Childress JF J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):105-22. PubMed ID: 15573433 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Are research ethics bad for our mental health? Michels R N Engl J Med; 1999 May; 340(18):1427-30. PubMed ID: 10228197 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The regulation of human experimentation in the United States--a personal odyssey. Katz J IRB; 1987; 9(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 11649890 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Nondevelopmental research on human subjects: the impact of the recommendations of the National Commission. Levine RJ Fed Proc; 1977 Sep; 36(10):2359-64. PubMed ID: 892005 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Ethical issues in clinical neurological research. Shore D; Berg K; Mullican C J Calif Alliance Ment Ill; 1994; 5(1):61-2. PubMed ID: 11653329 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Energy department X-rays skeletons in Cold War closet. Reichhardt T Nature; 1995 Aug; 376(6542):627. PubMed ID: 7651502 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. US bioethics panel poised to judge local review boards. Macilwain C Nature; 1996 Oct; 383(6600):466. PubMed ID: 8849708 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. National commission proposes numerous new regulations of institutional review boards. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1998 Oct; 13(10):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657739 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Safety boards must report their conclusions to IRBs. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1999 Oct; 14(10):3. PubMed ID: 11658061 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. United States regulatory requirements for research involving human subjects. J Biolaw Bus; 1998; 1(2):39-53. PubMed ID: 12739542 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Health Research Extension Act of 1985. Public Law 99-158. United States US Statut Large; 1985; 99(Title IV Sections 1-12):. PubMed ID: 11686169 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A higher standard for human research. Nat Med; 1999 Jun; 5(6):591. PubMed ID: 10371478 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Protection of human subjects. United States Code Fed Regul Shipping; 1982 Oct; Part 46, Sections 46.101 to 46.306():. PubMed ID: 11660819 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The NIH trials of growth hormone for short stature. Tauer CA IRB; 1994 May; 16(3):1-9. PubMed ID: 11659923 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. US agencies split over inquiry into effects of radiation experiments. Macilwain C Nature; 1994 Apr; 368(6474):781. PubMed ID: 8159229 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]