These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7566117)

  • 21. Bateman's principle and immunity: phenotypically plastic reproductive strategies predict changes in immunological sex differences.
    McKean KA; Nunney L
    Evolution; 2005 Jul; 59(7):1510-7. PubMed ID: 16153036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The evolution of female mating preferences: differentiation from species with promiscuous males can promote speciation.
    McPeek MA; Gavrilets S
    Evolution; 2006 Oct; 60(10):1967-80. PubMed ID: 17133854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Natural selection and divergence in mate preference during speciation.
    Nosil P; Crespi BJ; Gries R; Gries G
    Genetica; 2007 Mar; 129(3):309-27. PubMed ID: 16900317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Sexual selection and condition-dependent mate preferences.
    Cotton S; Small J; Pomiankowski A
    Curr Biol; 2006 Sep; 16(17):R755-65. PubMed ID: 16950102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Sexual selection and maintenance of sex: evidence from comparisons of rates of genomic accumulation of mutations and divergence of sex-related genes in sexual and hermaphroditic species of Caenorhabditis.
    Artieri CG; Haerty W; Gupta BP; Singh RS
    Mol Biol Evol; 2008 May; 25(5):972-9. PubMed ID: 18281268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The roles of natural and sexual selection during adaptation to a novel environment.
    Rundle HD; Chenoweth SF; Blows MW
    Evolution; 2006 Nov; 60(11):2218-25. PubMed ID: 17236415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sexual selection and immune function in Drosophila melanogaster.
    McKean KA; Nunney L
    Evolution; 2008 Feb; 62(2):386-400. PubMed ID: 18070086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Sexual selection and allometry: a critical reappraisal of the evidence and ideas.
    Bonduriansky R
    Evolution; 2007 Apr; 61(4):838-49. PubMed ID: 17439616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Male versus female mate choice: sexual selection and the evolution of species recognition via reinforcement.
    Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2007 Dec; 61(12):2772-89. PubMed ID: 17924955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Can non-directional male mating preferences facilitate honest female ornamentation?
    Chenoweth SF; Doughty P; Kokko H
    Ecol Lett; 2006 Feb; 9(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 16958883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Genetic constraints and the evolution of display trait sexual dimorphism by natural and sexual selection.
    Chenoweth SF; Rundle HD; Blows MW
    Am Nat; 2008 Jan; 171(1):22-34. PubMed ID: 18171148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Interactions among quantitative traits in the course of sympatric speciation.
    Kondrashov AS; Kondrashov FA
    Nature; 1999 Jul; 400(6742):351-4. PubMed ID: 10432111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Sympatric speciation by sexual selection alone is unlikely.
    Arnegard ME; Kondrashov AS
    Evolution; 2004 Feb; 58(2):222-37. PubMed ID: 15068341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Signaling efficacy drives the evolution of larger sexual ornaments by sexual selection.
    Tazzyman SJ; Iwasa Y; Pomiankowski A
    Evolution; 2014 Jan; 68(1):216-29. PubMed ID: 24099137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Sensory bias as an explanation for the evolution of mate preferences.
    Fuller RC; Houle D; Travis J
    Am Nat; 2005 Oct; 166(4):437-46. PubMed ID: 16224700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Parallel evolution of sexual isolation in sticklebacks.
    Boughman JW; Rundle HD; Schluter D
    Evolution; 2005 Feb; 59(2):361-73. PubMed ID: 15807421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Adaptive plasticity in female mate choice dampens sexual selection on male ornaments in the lark bunting.
    Chaine AS; Lyon BE
    Science; 2008 Jan; 319(5862):459-62. PubMed ID: 18218896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Advertisement-call preferences in diploid-tetraploid treefrogs (Hyla chrysoscelis and Hyla versicolor): implications for mate choice and the evolution of communication systems.
    Gerhardt HC
    Evolution; 2005 Feb; 59(2):395-408. PubMed ID: 15807424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The form of sexual selection on male genitalia cannot be inferred from within-population variance and allometry - a case study in Aquarius remigis.
    Bertin A; Fairbairn DJ
    Evolution; 2007 Apr; 61(4):825-37. PubMed ID: 17439615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evolutionary dynamics of a sexual ornament in the house sparrow (Passer domesticus): the role of indirect selection within and between sexes.
    Jensen H; Steinsland I; Ringsby TH; Saether BE
    Evolution; 2008 Jun; 62(6):1275-93. PubMed ID: 18384654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.