BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7568378)

  • 1. The physical performance of different x-ray contrast agents: calculations using a Monte Carlo model of the imaging chain.
    Sandborg M; Christoffersson JO; Carlsson GA; Almén T; Dance DR
    Phys Med Biol; 1995 Jul; 40(7):1209-24. PubMed ID: 7568378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A search for improved technique factors in paediatric fluoroscopy.
    Tapiovaara MJ; Sandborg M; Dance DR
    Phys Med Biol; 1999 Feb; 44(2):537-59. PubMed ID: 10070800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Experimental and theoretical x-ray imaging performance comparison of iodine and lanthanide contrast agents.
    Cardinal HN; Holdsworth DW; Drangova M; Hobbs BB; Fenster A
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(1):15-31. PubMed ID: 8455493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of image quality in fluoroscopy by measurements and Monte Carlo calculations.
    Tapiovaara MJ; Sandborg M
    Phys Med Biol; 1995 Apr; 40(4):589-607. PubMed ID: 7610116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sensitivity study of proton radiography and comparison with kV and MV x-ray imaging using GEANT4 Monte Carlo simulations.
    Depauw N; Seco J
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Apr; 56(8):2407-21. PubMed ID: 21427482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Potential of high-Z contrast agents in clinical contrast-enhanced computed tomography.
    Nowak T; Hupfer M; Brauweiler R; Eisa F; Kalender WA
    Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6469-82. PubMed ID: 22149830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contrast-to-noise ratios of different elements in digital mammography: evaluation of their potential as new contrast agents.
    Diekmann F; Sommer A; Lawaczeck R; Diekmann S; Pietsch H; Speck U; Hamm B; Bick U
    Invest Radiol; 2007 May; 42(5):319-25. PubMed ID: 17414528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The upper limits of the SNR in radiography and CT with polyenergetic x-rays.
    Shikhaliev PM
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Sep; 55(18):5317-39. PubMed ID: 20736493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of x-ray energy dispersion in digital subtraction imaging at the iodine K-edge--a Monte Carlo study.
    Prino F; Ceballos C; Cabal A; Sarnelli A; Gambaccini M; Ramello L
    Med Phys; 2008 Jan; 35(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 18293556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A monte carlo comparison of three different media for contrast enhanced radiotherapy of the prostate.
    Garnica-Garza HM
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Jun; 9(3):271-8. PubMed ID: 20441237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. X-ray image intensifier performance and patient doses for combinations of supplemental beam filters and vascular contrast agents.
    McParland BJ; Boyd MM
    Phys Med Biol; 2001 Jan; 46(1):227-44. PubMed ID: 11197674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of x-ray tube parameters and iodine concentration on image quality and radiation dose in cerebral pediatric and adult CT angiography: a phantom study.
    Papadakis AE; Perisinakis K; Raissaki M; Damilakis J
    Invest Radiol; 2013 Apr; 48(4):192-9. PubMed ID: 23344518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of patient thickness and imaging system on patient dose and physical image quality in digital chest imaging.
    Ullman G; Sandborg M; Dance DR; Hunt R; Alm Carlsson G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):294-7. PubMed ID: 15933124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Subjective Contrast of Pulmonary Tissues in CsI-FPD Chest Radiography Using Model Phantom by Monte Carlo Simulation].
    Oda N; Uehara S; Nakano T; Ideguchi T; Sakamoto H; Tabata Y; Akazawa H; Aoki T
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2023 Feb; 79(2):128-141. PubMed ID: 36653125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A search for optimal x-ray spectra in iodine contrast media mammography.
    Ullman G; Sandborg M; Dance DR; Yaffe M; Alm Carlsson G
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jul; 50(13):3143-52. PubMed ID: 15972986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. CT Image Contrast of High-Z Elements: Phantom Imaging Studies and Clinical Implications.
    FitzGerald PF; Colborn RE; Edic PM; Lambert JW; Torres AS; Bonitatibus PJ; Yeh BM
    Radiology; 2016 Mar; 278(3):723-33. PubMed ID: 26356064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does administering iodine in radiological procedures increase patient doses?
    He W; Huda W; Mah E; Yao H
    Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):113901. PubMed ID: 25370675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Photon counting x-ray imaging with K-edge filtered x-rays: A simulation study.
    Atak H; Shikhaliev PM
    Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 43(3):1385-400. PubMed ID: 26936723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of Rhenium and Iodine as Contrast Agents in X-Ray Imaging.
    De La Vega JC; Esquinas PL; Gill JK; Jessa S; Gill B; Thakur Y; Saatchi K; Häfeli UO
    Contrast Media Mol Imaging; 2021; 2021():1250360. PubMed ID: 34803544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Application- and patient size-dependent optimization of x-ray spectra for CT.
    Kalender WA; Deak P; Kellermeier M; van Straten M; Vollmar SV
    Med Phys; 2009 Mar; 36(3):993-1007. PubMed ID: 19378760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.