These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7568570)

  • 1. Psychological science and the use of anatomically detailed dolls in child sexual-abuse assessments.
    Koocher GP; Goodman GS; White CS; Friedrich WN; Sivan AB; Reynolds CR
    Psychol Bull; 1995 Sep; 118(2):199-222. PubMed ID: 7568570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The use of dolls to interview young children: issues of symbolic representation.
    DeLoache JS; Marzolf DP
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1995 Aug; 60(1):155-73. PubMed ID: 7545206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of nonanatomical dolls in the sexual abuse interview.
    Britton HL; O'Keefe MA
    Child Abuse Negl; 1991; 15(4):567-73. PubMed ID: 1959088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assumptions and beliefs about the role of AD dolls in child sexual abuse validation interviews: are they supported empirically?
    Skinner LJ
    Behav Sci Law; 1996; 14(2):167-85. PubMed ID: 10160234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Anatomically-neutral dolls: their effects on the memory and suggestibility of 4- to 6-year-old eyewitnesses.
    Samra J; Yuille JC
    Child Abuse Negl; 1996 Dec; 20(12):1261-72. PubMed ID: 8985617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Children's use of anatomically detailed dolls to recount an event.
    Goodman GS; Aman C
    Child Dev; 1990 Dec; 61(6):1859-71. PubMed ID: 2083502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Anatomical dolls: their use in assessment of children who may have been sexually abused.
    Faller KC
    J Child Sex Abus; 2005; 14(3):1-21. PubMed ID: 16203692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Anatomical doll play of preschoolers referred for sexual abuse and those not referred.
    Cohn DS
    Child Abuse Negl; 1991; 15(4):455-66. PubMed ID: 1959077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The response of young, non-sexually abused children to anatomically correct dolls.
    Glaser D; Collins C
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 1989 Jul; 30(4):547-60. PubMed ID: 2768357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interaction of normal children with anatomical dolls.
    Sivan AB; Schor DP; Koeppl GK; Noble LD
    Child Abuse Negl; 1988; 12(3):295-304. PubMed ID: 3167619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of anatomical dolls by Boston-area professionals.
    Kendall-Tackett KA; Watson MW
    Child Abuse Negl; 1992; 16(3):423-8. PubMed ID: 1617476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Agreement among professionals about a child's sexual abuse status: interviews with sexually anatomically correct dolls as indicators of abuse.
    Realmuto GM; Wescoe S
    Child Abuse Negl; 1992; 16(5):719-25. PubMed ID: 1393730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Professionals' standards of "normal" behavior with anatomical dolls and factors that influence these standards.
    Kendall-Tackett KA
    Child Abuse Negl; 1992; 16(5):727-33. PubMed ID: 1393731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Investigative interviews of alleged sexual abuse victims with and without anatomical dolls.
    Lamb ME; Hershkowitz I; Sternberg KJ; Boat B; Everson MD
    Child Abuse Negl; 1996 Dec; 20(12):1251-9. PubMed ID: 8985616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sexualized doll play among young children: implications for the use of anatomical dolls in sexual abuse evaluations.
    Everson MD; Boat BW
    J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry; 1990 Sep; 29(5):736-42. PubMed ID: 2228926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of sexually abused and nonsexually abused children's behavioral responses to anatomically correct dolls.
    August RL; Forman BD
    Child Psychiatry Hum Dev; 1989; 20(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 2766873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The use of anatomical dolls as assessment and evidentiary tools.
    Lie GY; Inman A
    Soc Work; 1991 Sep; 36(5):396-9. PubMed ID: 1925700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Putting the anatomical doll controversy in perspective: an examination of the major uses and criticisms of the dolls in child sexual abuse evaluations.
    Everson MD; Boat BW
    Child Abuse Negl; 1994 Feb; 18(2):113-29. PubMed ID: 8199895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Specificity and sensitivity of sexually anatomically correct dolls in substantiating abuse: a pilot study.
    Realmuto GM; Jensen JB; Wescoe S
    J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry; 1990 Sep; 29(5):743-6. PubMed ID: 2228927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Children's use of anatomically detailed dolls to report genital touching in a medical examination: developmental and gender comparisons.
    Bruck M; Ceci SJ; Francoeur E
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2000 Mar; 6(1):74-83. PubMed ID: 10937313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.