These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7568575)

  • 1. Tests that are robust against variance heterogeneity in k x 2 designs with unequal cell frequencies.
    Overall JE; Atlas RS; Gibson JM
    Psychol Rep; 1995 Jun; 76(3 Pt 1):1011-7. PubMed ID: 7568575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Power of a test that is robust against variance heterogeneity.
    Overall JE; Atlas RS; Gibson JM
    Psychol Rep; 1995 Aug; 77(1):155-9. PubMed ID: 7501755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A simple procedure to compute the sample size needed to compare two independent groups when the population variances are unequal.
    Singer J
    Stat Med; 2001 Apr; 20(7):1089-95. PubMed ID: 11276038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robust tests for the multivariate Behrens-Fisher problem.
    Lix LM; Keselman HJ; Hinds AM
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2005 Feb; 77(2):129-39. PubMed ID: 15652635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Power and Type I errors for pairwise comparisons of means in the unequal variances case.
    Ramsey PH; Ramsey PP
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):263-81. PubMed ID: 18331666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance of five two-sample location tests for skewed distributions with unequal variances.
    Fagerland MW; Sandvik L
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2009 Sep; 30(5):490-6. PubMed ID: 19577012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On sample size calculation for 2x2 fixed-effect ANOVA when variances are unknown and possibly unequal.
    Guo JH; Luh WM
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):417-25. PubMed ID: 18559139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index?
    Huedo-Medina TB; Sánchez-Meca J; Marín-Martínez F; Botella J
    Psychol Methods; 2006 Jun; 11(2):193-206. PubMed ID: 16784338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Power of pairwise comparisons in the equal variance and unequal sample size case.
    Ramsey PH; Ramsey PP
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 May; 61(Pt 1):115-31. PubMed ID: 18482478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How many repeated measurements are useful?
    Overall JE
    J Clin Psychol; 1996 May; 52(3):243-52. PubMed ID: 8835686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tests for the analysis of variance of crossover designs with correlated errors.
    Bellavance F; Tardif S; Stephens MA
    Biometrics; 1996 Jun; 52(2):607-12. PubMed ID: 8672705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Unequal group variances in microarray data analyses.
    Demissie M; Mascialino B; Calza S; Pawitan Y
    Bioinformatics; 2008 May; 24(9):1168-74. PubMed ID: 18344518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A note on preliminary tests of equality of variances.
    Zimmerman DW
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2004 May; 57(Pt 1):173-81. PubMed ID: 15171807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of non-normality on test statistics for one-way independent groups designs.
    Cribbie RA; Fiksenbaum L; Keselman HJ; Wilcox RR
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2012 Feb; 65(1):56-73. PubMed ID: 21426313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating clinical significance: incorporating robust statistics with normative comparison tests.
    van Wieringen K; Cribbie RA
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2014 May; 67(2):213-30. PubMed ID: 23751017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tests for inter-subject and total variabilities under crossover designs.
    Lee Y; Shao J; Chow SC; Wang H
    J Biopharm Stat; 2002 Nov; 12(4):503-34. PubMed ID: 12477072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A new outlier identification test for method comparison studies based on robust regression.
    Rauch G; Geistanger A; Timm J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Jan; 21(1):151-69. PubMed ID: 21191861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Baseline correction in a two-way randomized blocks design.
    Overall JE; Magee KN
    J Biopharm Stat; 1992; 2(2):205-17. PubMed ID: 1300214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Response adaptive designs with a variance-penalized criterion.
    Yi Y; Wang X
    Biom J; 2009 Oct; 51(5):763-73. PubMed ID: 19757432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of stopping rules on heterogeneity of results in overviews of clinical trials.
    Hughes MD; Freedman LS; Pocock SJ
    Biometrics; 1992 Mar; 48(1):41-53. PubMed ID: 1581492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.