These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Effects of resistance form on attachment strength of resin-retained castings. Wilkes PW; Shillingburg HT; Johnson DL J Okla Dent Assoc; 2000; 90(3):16-20, 22, 24-5. PubMed ID: 11314309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bonded restorations for the prevention and treatment of the cracked-tooth syndrome. Geurtsen W; GarcĂa-Godoy F Am J Dent; 1999 Dec; 12(6):266-70. PubMed ID: 10850244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives. Uludag B; Ozturk O; Ozturk AN J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Conservative indirect restorations for posterior teeth. Cast versus bonded ceramic. Donovan TE; Chee WW Dent Clin North Am; 1993 Jul; 37(3):433-43. PubMed ID: 8348996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vitro microleakage of luting cements and crown foundation material. Lindquist TJ; Connolly J J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 11264938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars. Dejak B; Mlotkowski A J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system. Ozturk N; Aykent F J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 12644803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interproximal integrity of posterior partial-coverage ceramic restorations: sequence of delivery and finishing. Liebenberg WH Quintessence Int; 1999 Dec; 30(12):807-18. PubMed ID: 10765857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vitro retentive strength of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns using different luting agents. Ernst CP; Cohnen U; Stender E; Willershausen B J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 93(6):551-8. PubMed ID: 15942616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of tooth preparation design on the breaking strength of Dicor crowns: 2. Doyle MG; Munoz CA; Goodacre CJ; Friedlander LD; Moore BK Int J Prosthodont; 1990; 3(3):241-8. PubMed ID: 2083010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of resin-bonded partial coverage ceramic restorations to treat incomplete fractures in posterior teeth: a clinical report. Liebenberg WH Quintessence Int; 1996 Nov; 27(11):739-47. PubMed ID: 9161265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Combining bonded and cemented restorations: a multitechnique case study. Shannon A Dent Today; 2000 Apr; 19(4):54, 56, 58-61; quiz 61, 151. PubMed ID: 19750729 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Integration of all-ceramic restorations in reconstructive prosthetic dentistry: a case report. Abboud M; Stark H; Koeck B Quintessence Int; 2004 Feb; 35(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 15000633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Microleakage associated with resin composite-cemented, cast glass ceramic restoration. Blair KF; Koeppen RG; Schwartz RS; Davis RD Int J Prosthodont; 1993; 6(6):579-84. PubMed ID: 8148030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of cavity preparation design on fracture resistance of posterior Leucite-reinforced ceramic restorations. Soares CJ; Martins LR; Fonseca RB; Correr-Sobrinho L; Fernandes Neto AJ J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):421-9. PubMed ID: 16765154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]