These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7568700)

  • 21. Fatigue load of teeth restored with bonded direct composite and indirect ceramic inlays in MOD class II cavity preparations.
    Shor A; Nicholls JI; Phillips KM; Libman WJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 12675458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. To what extent does the longevity of fixed dental prostheses depend on the function of the cement? Working Group 4 materials: cementation.
    Edelhoff D; Ozcan M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Jun; 18 Suppl 3():193-204. PubMed ID: 17594382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A retrospective evaluation of a series of dentin-bonded ceramic crowns.
    Burke FJ; Qualtrough AJ; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Feb; 29(2):103-6. PubMed ID: 9643243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Influence of tissue characteristics at margins on leakage of Class II indirect porcelain restorations.
    Ferrari M; Mason PN; Fabianelli A; Cagidiaco MC; Kugel G; Davidson CL
    Am J Dent; 1999 Jun; 12(3):134-42. PubMed ID: 10649936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. All-ceramic partial coverage restorations--midterm results of a 5-year prospective clinical splitmouth study.
    Guess PC; Strub JR; Steinhart N; Wolkewitz M; Stappert CF
    J Dent; 2009 Aug; 37(8):627-37. PubMed ID: 19477570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Fracture resistance of teeth directly and indirectly restored with composite resin and indirectly restored with ceramic materials.
    Dalpino PH; Francischone CE; Ishikiriama A; Franco EB
    Am J Dent; 2002 Dec; 15(6):389-94. PubMed ID: 12691276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The all-ceramic, inlay supported fixed partial denture. Part 1. Ceramic inlay preparation design: a literature review.
    Thompson MC; Thompson KM; Swain M
    Aust Dent J; 2010 Jun; 55(2):120-7; quiz 231. PubMed ID: 20604751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Influence of different cusp coverage methods for the extension of ceramic inlays on marginal integrity and enamel crack formation in vitro.
    Krifka S; Stangl M; Wiesbauer S; Hiller KA; Schmalz G; Federlin M
    Clin Oral Investig; 2009 Sep; 13(3):333-41. PubMed ID: 19137332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A three-step procedure for bonding all-ceramic crowns and inlays.
    Ritter RG
    Dent Today; 1999 Nov; 18(11):80-3. PubMed ID: 10803165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Correlation between microleakage and cement thickness in three Class II inlay ceramic systems.
    Romão W; Miranda WG; Cesar PF; Braga RR
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):212-8. PubMed ID: 15088734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The influence of veneering porcelain thickness of all-ceramic and metal ceramic crowns on failure resistance after cyclic loading.
    Shirakura A; Lee H; Geminiani A; Ercoli C; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Feb; 101(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 19167536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Survival of Dicor glass-ceramic dental restorations over 16 years. Part III: effect of luting agent and tooth or tooth-substitute core structure.
    Malament KA; Socransky SS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Nov; 86(5):511-9. PubMed ID: 11725279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Estimation of the risk of failure for an endodontically treated maxillary premolar with MODP preparation and CAD/CAM ceramic restorations.
    Lin CL; Chang YH; Pa CA
    J Endod; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1391-5. PubMed ID: 19801237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Strength estimation of different designs of ceramic inlays and onlays in molars based on the Tsai-Wu failure criterion.
    Dejak B; Mlotkowski A; Romanowicz M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Aug; 98(2):89-100. PubMed ID: 17692590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. All-ceramic partial coverage premolar restorations. Cavity preparation design, reliability and fracture resistance after fatigue.
    Stappert CF; Guess PC; Gerds T; Strub JR
    Am J Dent; 2005 Aug; 18(4):275-80. PubMed ID: 16296437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of tooth preparation burs and luting cement types on the marginal fit of extracoronal restorations.
    Ayad MF
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 19054303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Tooth structure removal associated with various preparation designs for posterior teeth.
    Edelhoff D; Sorensen JA
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2002 Jun; 22(3):241-9. PubMed ID: 12186346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Survival of resin-bonded porcelain veneer crowns placed with and without metal reinforcement.
    Etemadi S; Smales RJ
    J Dent; 2006 Feb; 34(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 16111799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Clinical performance of bonded leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after eight years.
    Krämer N; Frankenberger R
    Dent Mater; 2005 Mar; 21(3):262-71. PubMed ID: 15705433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Precision of fit of two margin designs for metal-ceramic crowns.
    Limkangwalmongkol P; Chiche GJ; Blatz MB
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):233-7. PubMed ID: 17451481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.