451 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7568708)
1. Composite resin-amalgam compound restorations.
Franchi M; Trisi P; Montanari G; Piattelli A
Quintessence Int; 1994 Aug; 25(8):577-82. PubMed ID: 7568708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Microleakage of class 2 Superbond-lined composite restorations with and without a cervical amalgam base.
Hovav S; Holan G; Lewinstein I; Fuks AB
Oper Dent; 1995; 20(2):63-7. PubMed ID: 8700773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design.
Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 11203946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laboratory evaluation of compomers in Class V restorations.
Chersoni S; Lorenzi R; Ferrieri P; Prati C
Am J Dent; 1997 Jun; 10(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 9545890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Marginal adaptation of heat-pressed glass-ceramic veneers to Class 3 composite restorations in vitro.
Christgau M; Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Edelmann K
Oper Dent; 1999; 24(4):233-44. PubMed ID: 10823069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Marginal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in Class II conservative preparations.
Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
Quintessence Int; 2001 May; 32(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 11444073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Marginal adaptation of composite restorations versus hybrid ionomer/composite sandwich restorations.
Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Hiller KA; Mortazavi F
Oper Dent; 1997; 22(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 9227124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An evaluation of marginal leakage of Class 2 combined amalgam-composite restorations.
Eidelman E; Holan G; Tanzer-Sarneh S; Chosack A
Oper Dent; 1990; 15(4):141-8. PubMed ID: 2216907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cavity preparation devices: effect on microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.
Setien VJ; Cobb DS; Denehy GE; Vargas MA
Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 11572294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing microleakage in resin composite restorations rebonded with a surface sealant and three low-viscosity resin systems.
Ramos RP; Chinelatti MA; Chimello DT; Dibb RG
Quintessence Int; 2002 Jun; 33(6):450-6. PubMed ID: 12073726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of cyclical lateral forces on microleakage in cervical resin composite restorations.
Fruits TJ; VanBrunt CL; Khajotia SS; Duncanson MG
Quintessence Int; 2002 Mar; 33(3):205-12. PubMed ID: 11921769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Directed polymerization shrinkage versus a horizontal incremental filling technique: interfacial adaptation in vivo in Class II cavities.
van Dijken JW; Hörstedt P; Waern R
Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):165-72. PubMed ID: 10388370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite.
de Andrade OS; de Goes MF; Montes MA
Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of resin-dentin and calcium hydroxide-dentin interface with resin composite restorations.
Goracci G; Mori G
Quintessence Int; 1996 Feb; 27(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 9063224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The marginal seal of Class II restorations: flowable composite resin compared to injectable glass ionomer.
Payne JH
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 10204453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of placement techniques on the marginal adaptation of Class V composite restorations.
Sensi LG; Marson FC; Baratieri LN; Monteiro Junior S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2005 Nov; 6(4):17-25. PubMed ID: 16299603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fracture resistance of teeth with bonded amalgams.
Boyer DB; Roth L
Am J Dent; 1994 Apr; 7(2):91-4. PubMed ID: 8054193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Composite restorations: influence of flowable and self-curing resin composite linings on microleakage in vitro.
Peutzfeldt A; Asmussen E
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(6):569-75. PubMed ID: 12413221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of occlusal marginal adaptation of Class II resin-composite restorations.
Kreulen CM; van Amerongen WE; Akerboom HB; Borgmeijer PJ; Gruythuysen RJ
ASDC J Dent Child; 1993; 60(4-5):310-4. PubMed ID: 8258575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Microleakage of Class V composites using different placement and curing techniques: an in vitro study.
St Georges AJ; Wilder AD; Perdigão J; Swift EJ
Am J Dent; 2002 Aug; 15(4):244-7. PubMed ID: 12572642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
