144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7568725)
1. Comparisons of fit of CAD-CAM restorations using three imaging surfaces.
Hembree JH
Quintessence Int; 1995 Feb; 26(2):145-7. PubMed ID: 7568725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Scanning electron microscope evaluation of CEREC II and CEREC III inlays.
Estafan D; Dussetschleger F; Agosta C; Reich S
Gen Dent; 2003; 51(5):450-4. PubMed ID: 15055635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of fit adjustment on CEREC CAD-CAM veneers.
White SN; Suh PS; Yu Z; Johnson R
Am J Dent; 1997 Feb; 10(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 9545921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Marginal fit and short-term clinical performance of porcelain-veneered CICERO, CEREC, and Procera onlays.
Denissen H; Dozić A; van der Zel J; van Waas M
J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Nov; 84(5):506-13. PubMed ID: 11105006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Marginal adaptation of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM composite crowns using two different finish line preparation designs.
Akbar JH; Petrie CS; Walker MP; Williams K; Eick JD
J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):155-63. PubMed ID: 16681497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Margin gap size of ceramic inlays using second-generation CAD/CAM equipment.
Sturdevant JR; Bayne SC; Heymann HO
J Esthet Dent; 1999; 11(4):206-14. PubMed ID: 10825877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An evaluation of the fit of porcelain inlays.
Qualtrough AJ; Sharp RA; Piddock V
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1996 Jun; 4(2):65-9. PubMed ID: 9171024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of different methods of optical impression making on the marginal gap of onlays created with CEREC 3D.
da Costa JB; Pelogia F; Hagedorn B; Ferracane JL
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):324-9. PubMed ID: 20533633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of Chairside CAD/CAM Restoration Type on Marginal Fit Accuracy: A Comparison of Crown, Inlay and Onlay Restorations.
Merrill TC; Mackey T; Luc R; Lung D; Naseem A; Abduo J
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2021 May; 29(2):119-127. PubMed ID: 33393741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computer-aided direct ceramic restorations: a 10-year prospective clinical study of Cerec CAD/CAM inlays and onlays.
Otto T; De Nisco S
Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 11951800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The optical Cerec impression--electronic model production.
Wiedhahn K
Int J Comput Dent; 1998 Sep; 1(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 11351459
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term clinical results of chairside Cerec CAD/CAM inlays and onlays: a case series.
Otto T; Schneider D
Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 18350948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Luting composite thickness of two ceramic inlay systems.
Sertgöz A; Gemalmaz D; Alkumru H; Yoruç B
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1995 Jun; 3(4):151-4. PubMed ID: 8601157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays.
Hannig C; Westphal C; Becker K; Attin T
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 16198171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An in vitro evaluation of fit of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic four-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems, before and after porcelain firing cycles and after glaze cycles.
Vigolo P; Fonzi F
J Prosthodont; 2008 Dec; 17(8):621-6. PubMed ID: 18798783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Marginal fit of CAD/CAM ceramic inlays].
Chen Y; Zhao Y; Wang H
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1997 Nov; 15(4):317-8, 327. PubMed ID: 11479977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A randomized 5-year clinical evaluation of 3 ceramic inlay systems.
Molin MK; Karlsson SL
Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):194-200. PubMed ID: 11203631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Marginal adaptation of three different zirconium dioxide three-unit fixed dental prostheses.
Att W; Komine F; Gerds T; Strub JR
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):239-47. PubMed ID: 19328277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system.
Ozturk N; Aykent F
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 12644803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro evaluation of fit of adhesively luted ceramic inlays.
Audenino G; Bresciano ME; Bassi F; Carossa S
Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(4):342-7. PubMed ID: 10635204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
