158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7569153)
1. [Cesarean section: Pelosi's simplified technique].
Pelosi MA; Ortega I
Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol; 1994; 59(5):372-7. PubMed ID: 7569153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Modified Misgav Ladach method for cesarean section: clinical experience.
Kulas T; Habek D; Karsa M; Bobić-Vuković M
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2008; 65(4):222-6. PubMed ID: 18196903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pelosi minimally invasive technique of cesarean section.
Pelosi MA; Pelosi MA
Surg Technol Int; 2004; 13():137-46. PubMed ID: 15744684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Comparative trial between traditional cesarean section and Misgav-Ladach technique].
Gutiérrez JG; Coló JA; Arreola MS
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2008 Feb; 76(2):75-80. PubMed ID: 18798399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A randomized controlled study of peritoneal closure at cesarean section.
Galaal KA; Krolikowski A
Saudi Med J; 2000 Aug; 21(8):759-61. PubMed ID: 11423890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Towards simplified cesarean section?].
Gaucherand P; Bessai K; Sergeant P; Rudigoz RC
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2001 Jun; 30(4):348-52. PubMed ID: 11431614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of a newer technique for cesarean section.
Lurie S; Feinstein M; Mamet Y
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2002 Aug; 266(4):195-7. PubMed ID: 12192477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pelosi-type vs. traditional cesarean delivery. A prospective comparison.
Wood RM; Simon H; Oz AU
J Reprod Med; 1999 Sep; 44(9):788-95. PubMed ID: 10509303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The modified Misgav-Ladach versus the Pfannenstiel-Kerr technique for cesarean section: a randomized trial.
Xavier P; Ayres-De-Campos D; Reynolds A; Guimarães M; Costa-Santos C; Patrício B
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Sep; 84(9):878-82. PubMed ID: 16097980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Double-layer closure of uterine incision with visceral and parietal peritoneal closure: are they obligatory steps of routine cesarean sections?
Ohel G; Younis JS; Lang N; Levit A
J Matern Fetal Med; 1996; 5(6):366-9. PubMed ID: 8972417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative study of the ''Misgav Ladach'' and traditional Pfannenstiel surgical techniques for cesarean section.
Belci D; Kos M; Zoricić D; Kuharić L; Slivar A; Begić-Razem E; Grdinić I
Minerva Ginecol; 2007 Jun; 59(3):231-40. PubMed ID: 17576402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [An analysis of 500 cesarean sections performed by a resident].
Panduro Barón JG; Panduro Barón JL; Guzmán Sánchez A; Orozco Ibarra LG
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1988 Jun; 56():149-52. PubMed ID: 3154230
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Innovations of the Stark method for cesarean section. Comparison of techniques].
Grignaffini A; Bazzani F; Rinaldi M; Azzoni D; Vadora E
Minerva Ginecol; 1999 Dec; 51(12):475-82. PubMed ID: 10767996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Costs for cesarean section: regional variations.
Stat Bull Metrop Insur Co; 1986; 67(3):2-10. PubMed ID: 3738734
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [The "gentle caesarean section" - an alternative to the classical way of sectio. A prospective comparison between the classical technique and the method of Misgav Ladach].
Redlich A; Köppe I
Zentralbl Gynakol; 2001 Nov; 123(11):638-43. PubMed ID: 11797162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Incremental charges, costs, and length of stay associated with obesity as a secondary diagnosis among pregnant women.
Trasande L; Lee M; Liu Y; Weitzman M; Savitz D
Med Care; 2009 Oct; 47(10):1046-52. PubMed ID: 19820612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Results of the Misgav Ladach caesarean section].
Heidenreich W; Borgmann U
Zentralbl Gynakol; 2001 Nov; 123(11):634-7. PubMed ID: 11797161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Symphysiotomy or caesarean section after failed trial of assisted delivery.
Mola GD
P N G Med J; 1995 Sep; 38(3):172-7. PubMed ID: 9522856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Misgav Ladach method: a step forward in the operative technique of caesarean section.
Poonam ; Banerjee B; Singh SN; Raina A
Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ); 2006; 4(2):198-202. PubMed ID: 18603898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Stark's method of cesarean section. Advantages compared to the traditional method].
Corosu R; Roma B; Vizzaccaro F; Franchi M
Minerva Ginecol; 1999 May; 51(5):203-5. PubMed ID: 10431531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
