These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7569658)

  • 1. The mask: style and volume do not influence rhinomanometry.
    Maranta CA; Scherrer JL; Simmen D
    Rhinology; 1995 Jun; 33(2):84-5. PubMed ID: 7569658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of nasal valve stent with anterior rhinomanometry to quantitate nasal valve obstruction.
    Guillette BJ; Perry CJ
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1990 Mar; 99(3 Pt 1):175-8. PubMed ID: 2310131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nasal versus face mask for multiple-breath washout technique in preterm infants.
    Schulzke SM; Deeptha K; Sinhal S; Baldwin DN; Pillow JJ
    Pediatr Pulmonol; 2008 Sep; 43(9):858-65. PubMed ID: 18680178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Manometric rhinometry: a new method of measuring nasal volume.
    Porter M; Williamson I; Kerridge D; Maw R
    Rhinology; 1995 Jun; 33(2):86-8. PubMed ID: 7569659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rhinomanometric evaluation of the improved mechanical therapeutic nasal dilator in patients with anterior nasal obstruction.
    Chaudhry MR; Akhtar S; Dwalsaint F
    Rhinology; 1996 Mar; 34(1):32-4. PubMed ID: 8739866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Position of exhalation port and mask design affect CO2 rebreathing during noninvasive positive pressure ventilation.
    Schettino GP; Chatmongkolchart S; Hess DR; Kacmarek RM
    Crit Care Med; 2003 Aug; 31(8):2178-82. PubMed ID: 12973177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Rhinomanometry].
    Ghaem A
    Rev Mal Respir; 1996; 13(2):191-2. PubMed ID: 8711240
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of face masks in the bag-mask ventilation of a manikin.
    Redfern D; Rassam S; Stacey MR; Mecklenburgh JS
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2006 Feb; 23(2):169-72. PubMed ID: 16426473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rhinomanometry 1988: practice and trends.
    Cole P
    Laryngoscope; 1989 Mar; 99(3):311-5. PubMed ID: 2645495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [A computer-assisted system for diagnosing rhinologic function].
    Vogt K; Sachse D; Wernecke KD; Kriesmer T
    HNO; 1990 Mar; 38(3):110-5. PubMed ID: 2341296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Flow-dependent resistance of nasal masks used for non-invasive positive pressure ventilation.
    Windisch W; Buchholt A; Stahl CA; Sorichter S; Guttmann J
    Respirology; 2006 Jul; 11(4):471-6. PubMed ID: 16771919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sensation of nasal obstruction compared to rhinomanometric results in patients referred for septoplasty.
    Sipilä J; Suonpää J; Laippala P
    Rhinology; 1994 Sep; 32(3):141-4. PubMed ID: 7839086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neonatal resuscitation 3: manometer use in a model of face mask ventilation.
    O'Donnell CP; Davis PG; Lau R; Dargaville PA; Doyle LW; Morley CJ
    Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2005 Sep; 90(5):F397-400. PubMed ID: 15871988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nasal airway volume and resistance to airflow.
    Zhang G; Solomon P; Rival R; Fenton RS; Cole P
    Am J Rhinol; 2008; 22(4):371-5. PubMed ID: 18702900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An international comparison of rhinomanometry between Canada and Japan.
    Naito K; Iwata S; Cole P; Fraschetti J; Humphrey D
    Rhinology; 1991 Dec; 29(4):287-94. PubMed ID: 1780630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Rhinomanometry: indications, limitations and results].
    Le Sellin J; Sabbah A; Drouet M; Bonneau JC; Fourrier E
    Allerg Immunol (Paris); 1990 Mar; 22(3):103-6. PubMed ID: 2340066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rhinoresistometry versus rhinomanometry--an evaluation.
    Temmel AF; Toth J; Marks B; Jäger S; Berger U; Reiser K; Horak F
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1998 Sep; 110(17):612-5. PubMed ID: 9816631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automated rhinomanometry.
    Jonson B; Malm L; Ivarsson A; Benthin M; Lamm CJ
    Rhinology; 1983 Sep; 21(3):265-72. PubMed ID: 6635475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sources of variability in posterior rhinomanometry.
    James DS; Stidley CA; Mermier CM; Lambert WE; Chick TW; Samet JM
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1993 Aug; 102(8 Pt 1):631-8. PubMed ID: 8352489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acoustic rhinometry, rhinomanometry, and the sensation of nasal patency: a correlative study.
    Roithmann R; Cole P; Chapnik J; Barreto SM; Szalai JP; Zamel N
    J Otolaryngol; 1994 Dec; 23(6):454-8. PubMed ID: 7897780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.