BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7569870)

  • 1. Women's experiences at cervical screening.
    Crombie IK; Orbell S; Johnston G; Robertson AJ; Kenicer M
    Scott Med J; 1995 Jun; 40(3):81-2. PubMed ID: 7569870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Women's attitudes to and awareness of smear testing and cervical cancer.
    Yu CK; Rymer J
    Br J Fam Plann; 1998 Jan; 23(4):127-33. PubMed ID: 9882766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How can the uptake of cervical cytology screening be improved?
    Perry MA
    Nurs Stand; 2001 Nov 28-Dec 4; 16(11):33-6. PubMed ID: 11974848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of primary care professionals in women's experiences of cervical cancer screening: a qualitative study.
    Armstrong N; James V; Dixon-Woods M
    Fam Pract; 2012 Aug; 29(4):462-6. PubMed ID: 22090193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Informed consent? How do primary care professionals prepare women for cervical smears: a qualitative study.
    Chew-Graham C; Mole E; Evans LJ; Rogers A
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Jun; 61(3):381-8. PubMed ID: 15964735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How can young women be encouraged to attend cervical cancer screening? Suggestions from face-to-face and internet focus group discussions with 30-year-old women in Stockholm, Sweden.
    Blomberg K; Tishelman C; Ternestedt BM; Törnberg S; Levál A; Widmark C
    Acta Oncol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):112-20. PubMed ID: 21091087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Balancing uncertainty and acceptance: understanding Chinese women's responses to an abnormal cervical smear result.
    Twinn S
    J Clin Nurs; 2006 Sep; 15(9):1140-8. PubMed ID: 16911055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Uptake of cervical cancer screening in The Netherlands is mainly influenced by women's beliefs about the screening and by the inviting organization.
    Tacken MA; Braspenning JC; Hermens RP; Spreeuwenberg PM; van den Hoogen HJ; de Bakker DH; Groenewegen PP; Grol RP
    Eur J Public Health; 2007 Apr; 17(2):178-85. PubMed ID: 16837520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Women's perceptions and social barriers determine compliance to cervical screening: results from a population based study in India.
    Basu P; Sarkar S; Mukherjee S; Ghoshal M; Mittal S; Biswas S; Mandal R; Sankaranarayanan R
    Cancer Detect Prev; 2006; 30(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 16963194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cervical screening in HIV-positive women: characteristics of those who default and attitudes towards screening.
    Shah S; Montgomery H; Smith C; Madge S; Walker P; Evans H; Johnson M; Sabin C
    HIV Med; 2006 Jan; 7(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 16313292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cervical cancer screening: women's knowledge, attitudes and preferences.
    Nicoll PM; Narayan KV; Paterson JG
    Health Bull (Edinb); 1991 May; 49(3):184-90. PubMed ID: 1917453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cervical screening: patients' negative attitudes and experiences.
    Baileff A
    Nurs Stand; 2000 Jul 19-25; 14(44):35-7. PubMed ID: 11975277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speculum 'self-insertion': a pilot study.
    Wright D; Fenwick J; Stephenson P; Monterosso L
    J Clin Nurs; 2005 Oct; 14(9):1098-111. PubMed ID: 16164528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cervical screening: Perceptions and barriers to uptake among Somali women in Camden.
    Abdullahi A; Copping J; Kessel A; Luck M; Bonell C
    Public Health; 2009 Oct; 123(10):680-5. PubMed ID: 19863980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Women at risk: papanicolaou smear screening in Florida.
    Vincent AL; Greene JN; Hoercherl S; McTague D
    J Fla Med Assoc; 1997; 84(5):302-7. PubMed ID: 9260433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sociocultural barriers to cervical screening in South Auckland, New Zealand.
    Lovell S; Kearns RA; Friesen W
    Soc Sci Med; 2007 Jul; 65(1):138-50. PubMed ID: 17433510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Barriers to cervical cancer screening in women attending the Family Medical Program in Niterói, Rio de Janeiro.
    Augusto EF; Rosa ML; Cavalcanti SM; Oliveira LH
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Jan; 287(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 22886356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reasons for non-attendance at cervical screening as reported by non-attendees in Sweden.
    Oscarsson MG; Benzein EG; Wijma BE
    J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Mar; 29(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 18266164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pap smear screening, pap smear abnormalities and psychosocial risk factors among women in a residential alcohol and drug rehabilitation facility.
    Soccio J; Brown M; Comino E; Friesen E
    J Adv Nurs; 2015 Dec; 71(12):2858-66. PubMed ID: 26279461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The cancer screening project for women: experiences of women who partner with women and women who partner with men.
    Clark MA; Bonacore L; Wright SJ; Armstrong G; Rakowski W
    Women Health; 2003; 38(2):19-33. PubMed ID: 14655792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.