These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7570381)
1. From collegial to codified. The evolution of modern peer review. Watts C Tex Med; 1995 Sep; 91(9):22-4. PubMed ID: 7570381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Federal Appeals Court reverses lower Court ruling; reaffirms immunity for hospitals and physicians in peer review cases. Leiker M WMJ; 2008 Nov; 107(7):344-6. PubMed ID: 19180875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Data bank has operational impact. Proper peer review can protect hospitals from antitrust and defamation suits. Purtell DL Health Prog; 1990 Nov; 71(9):66-71. PubMed ID: 10107457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Protection from discovery of hospital peer review committee records. Peterson RN Hosp Med Staff; 1984 Jul; 13(7):6-12. PubMed ID: 10267927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is peer review coming of age? Thorpe JH Med World News; 1989 Jun; 30(11):81. PubMed ID: 10293400 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Implementation of the Health Care Quality Improvement Act and the future of peer review. Trostorff DL Med Staff Couns; 1990; 4(2):23-31. PubMed ID: 10106574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Peer review: a secret affair? Dunn LJ Trustee; 1978 Apr; 31(4):9-11, 13. PubMed ID: 10307158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Physician peer review. Serving the patient or the physician? Cate MJ J Leg Med; 1999 Dec; 20(4):479-506. PubMed ID: 10641461 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Physicians' involvement is a key ingredient in peer review program. Hyden JP Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1982; 15(6):37-8. PubMed ID: 10257058 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Strategies for eliminating unfairness in peer review. Rozovsky FA; Rozovsky LE Med Staff Couns; 1992; 6(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 10115449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Assurance of process-quality in pulmonary practice by means of a peer-review system--a pilot project]. Fischer J; Köhler D; Magnussen H Pneumologie; 2006 Aug; 60(8):485-92. PubMed ID: 16933192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. New peer review law provides immunity with obligations. Valiant C Physician Exec; 1987; 13(3):26-7. PubMed ID: 10312139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Exploding 12 myths about quality assurance and peer review. Thompson RE Med Staff Couns; 1988; 2(4):39-49. PubMed ID: 10290183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The National Practitioner Data Bank: a step toward more effective peer review. Hackney VH J Health Hosp Law; 1991 Jul; 24(7):201-9, 219. PubMed ID: 10111631 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Quality assurance and continuous quality improvement--assessment of the current status of physician self-control for quality assurance in medicine 1955-1995]. Ollenschläger G; Thomeczek C Gesundheitswesen; 1996 Jul; 58(7):360-71. PubMed ID: 8963101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of Patrick v. Burget on peer review. Gainer PS; Miles JJ Med Staff Couns; 1988; 2(4):13-21. PubMed ID: 10290181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The National Practitioner Data Bank: the first 18 months. Puryear MA; Politzer RM; Anderson J; Mullan F Physician Exec; 1993; 19(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 10125933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]