These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7570708)

  • 1. [An experimental study of the tissue compatibility of titanium implants coated with hydroxyapatite and aluminum oxide by plasma spraying].
    Frolov AG; Triandafillidis S; Novikov SV; Fedorov SIu; Karasev MV; Tsimbalistov AV
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 1995; 74(3):9-11. PubMed ID: 7570708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Characterization and canine bone tissue reaction of hydroxyapatite-coated titanium using thermal decomposition method.
    Hasegawa S
    Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ; 1996 Mar; 43(1):25-44. PubMed ID: 8625434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of tissue reaction and osteointegration of metal implants between hydroxyapatite/Ti alloy coat: an animal experimental study.
    Itiravivong P; Promasa A; Laiprasert T; Techapongworachai T; Kuptniratsaikul S; Thanakit V; Heimann RB
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2003 Jun; 86 Suppl 2():S422-31. PubMed ID: 12930020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [A biological compatibility study of hydroxyapatite].
    Trofimov VV; Klimenov VA; Kazimirovskaia VB; Mansurova LA
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 1996; 75(5):20-2. PubMed ID: 9045399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of 3 different endosseous nonsubmerged implants in edentulous mandibles: a clinical report.
    Røynesdal AK; Ambjørnsen E; Haanaes HR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(4):543-8. PubMed ID: 10453670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of bioactive glass coated and hydroxyapatite coated titanium dental implants in the human jaw bone.
    Mistry S; Kundu D; Datta S; Basu D
    Aust Dent J; 2011 Mar; 56(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 21332743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differences between the bony interfaces of titanium and hydroxyapatite-alumina plasma-sprayed titanium blade implants.
    Morimoto K; Kihara A; Takeshita F; Akedo H; Suetsugu T
    J Oral Implantol; 1988; 14(3):314-24. PubMed ID: 2855931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Histologic evaluation of the osseous adaptation to titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated titanium implants.
    Jansen JA; van de Waerden JP; Wolke JG; de Groot K
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1991 Aug; 25(8):973-89. PubMed ID: 1655798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biological performance of chemical hydroxyapatite coating associated with implant surface modification by laser beam: biomechanical study in rabbit tibias.
    Faeda RS; Tavares HS; Sartori R; Guastaldi AC; Marcantonio E
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1706-15. PubMed ID: 19615586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bone response to plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite and radiofrequency-sputtered calcium phosphate implants in vivo.
    Ong JL; Bessho K; Carnes DL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(4):581-6. PubMed ID: 12182302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Microstructures of plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite-coated Ti-6Al-4V dental implants.
    Tufekci E; Brantley WA; Mitchell JC; McGlumphy EA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 9048451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical comparison of biomimetically and electrochemically deposited hydroxyapatite-coated porous titanium implants.
    Yang GL; He FM; Hu JA; Wang XX; Zhao SF
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Feb; 68(2):420-7. PubMed ID: 20116717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of hydroxyapatite (HA) -coated threaded, HA-coated cylindric, and titanium threaded endosseous dental implants.
    Jeffcoat MK; McGlumphy EA; Reddy MS; Geurs NC; Proskin HM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):406-10. PubMed ID: 12814316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hot isostatic pressing-processed hydroxyapatite-coated titanium implants: light microscopic and scanning electron microscopy investigations.
    Wie H; Herø H; Solheim T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(6):837-44. PubMed ID: 9857595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of electrochemically deposited nanohydroxyapatite on bone bonding of sandblasted/dual acid-etched titanium implant.
    He F; Yang G; Wang X; Zhao S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):790-9. PubMed ID: 19865618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Temperature changes at the implant-bone interface during simulated surface decontamination with an Er:YAG laser.
    Kreisler M; Al Haj H; d'Hoedt B
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(6):582-7. PubMed ID: 12475166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of hydroxyapatite/tricalcium-phosphate coating on osseointegration of plasma-sprayed titanium alloy implants.
    Stewart M; Welter JF; Goldberg VM
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2004 Apr; 69(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 14999745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Histological and mechanical comparison of hydroxyapatite-coated cobalt-chrome and titanium implants in the rabbit femur.
    Friedman RJ; Bauer TW; Garg K; Jiang M; An YH; Draughn RA
    J Appl Biomater; 1995; 6(4):231-5. PubMed ID: 8589507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Design optimization of functionally graded dental implant.
    Hedia HS; Mahmoud NA
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2004; 14(2):133-43. PubMed ID: 15156104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of titanium implant surface modification with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles in progressive early bone-implant fixation in vivo.
    Lin A; Wang CJ; Kelly J; Gubbi P; Nishimura I
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):808-16. PubMed ID: 19865620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.