These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7571145)

  • 41. Accurate blood peak velocity estimation using spectral models and vector doppler.
    Ricci S; Vilkomerson D; Matera R; Tortoli P
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2015 Apr; 62(4):686-96. PubMed ID: 25881346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Preservation of quadrature Doppler signals from bidirectional slow blood flow close to the vessel wall using an adaptive decomposition algorithm.
    Zhang Y; Shi X; Zhang K; Chen J
    Med Eng Phys; 2009 Mar; 31(2):268-75. PubMed ID: 18829373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The butterfly search technique for estimation of blood velocity.
    Alam SK; Parker KJ
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1995; 21(5):657-70. PubMed ID: 8525556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Quantification of ultrasound correlation-based flow velocity mapping and edge velocity gradient measurement.
    Park DW; Kruger GH; Rubin JM; Hamilton J; Gottschalk P; Dodde RE; Shih AJ; Weitzel WF
    J Ultrasound Med; 2013 Oct; 32(10):1815-30. PubMed ID: 24065263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. An in vitro study on the influence of limited frequency resolution on contrast agent-enhanced Doppler signals.
    Sponheim N; Myhrum M
    Ultrasonics; 1996 Jun; 34(2-5):599-601. PubMed ID: 8701549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Vascular flow and perfusion imaging with ultrasound contrast agents.
    Bruce M; Averkiou M; Tiemann K; Lohmaier S; Powers J; Beach K
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 Jun; 30(6):735-43. PubMed ID: 15219953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Blood flow velocity measurements: a comparison of 25 clinical ultrasonographic units.
    Groth DS; Zink FE; Felmlee JP; Kofler JM; James EM; Lindsey JR; Pavlicek W
    J Ultrasound Med; 1995 Apr; 14(4):273-7. PubMed ID: 7602684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Acoustic intensity for a long vessel with noncircular cross section.
    Thompson RS; Macaskill C; Fraser WB; Farnell L
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2004 May; 51(5):566-75. PubMed ID: 15217234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Smoothed power spectrum estimate applied for analysis of the Doppler signal from blood flow.
    Piechocki M; Herment A; Delouche A; Dumée P; Peronneau P
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 1991 Mar; 29(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 1857122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Understanding the Influence of Flow Velocity, Wall Motion Filter, Pulse Repetition Frequency, and Aliasing on Power Doppler Image Quantification.
    Martins MR; Martins WP; Soares CAM; Miyague AH; Kudla MJ; Pavan TZ
    J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Jan; 37(1):255-261. PubMed ID: 28736982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Volume flow measurement using Doppler and grey-scale decorrelation.
    Rubin JM; Tuthill TA; Fowlkes JB
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2001 Jan; 27(1):101-9. PubMed ID: 11295276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Quantitative investigation of in vitro flow using three-dimensional colour Doppler ultrasound.
    Guo Z; Moreau M; Rickey DW; Picot PA; Fenster A
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1995; 21(6):807-16. PubMed ID: 8571468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Mean blood velocity measurement with a narrow ultrasound beam and an asymmetric velocity profile.
    Willink R
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1999 Mar; 46(3):362-4. PubMed ID: 10097471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Evaluation of the effect of machine settings on quantitative three-dimensional power Doppler angiography: an in-vitro flow phantom experiment.
    Raine-Fenning NJ; Nordin NM; Ramnarine KV; Campbell BK; Clewes JS; Perkins A; Johnson IR
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 32(4):551-9. PubMed ID: 18726932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A novel approach for Doppler blood flow measurement.
    McNamara DM; Goli A; Ziarani AK
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():1883-5. PubMed ID: 19163056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Measurement accuracy of the flow velocity in pulsed ultrasound Doppler velocimeter.
    Kagiyama M; Ogasawara Y; Tadaoka S; Kajiya F
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1999 Oct; 25(8):1265-74. PubMed ID: 10576269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Causes and influential factors of spectral broadening in Doppler flow signal].
    Wen Y; Qian M; Gong X; Zhen B; Wan M
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 1997 Jun; 14(2):118-23. PubMed ID: 9817638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Sources of error in maximum velocity estimation using linear phased-array Doppler systems with steady flow.
    Steinman AH; Tavakkoli J; Myers JG; Cobbold RS; Johnston KW
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2001 May; 27(5):655-64. PubMed ID: 11397530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Determining the relationship between three-dimensional power Doppler data and true blood flow characteristics: an in-vitro flow phantom experiment.
    Raine-Fenning NJ; Nordin NM; Ramnarine KV; Campbell BK; Clewes JS; Perkins A; Johnson IR
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 32(4):540-50. PubMed ID: 18686275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Blood velocity estimation using compressive sensing.
    Richy J; Friboulet D; Bernard A; Bernard O; Liebgott H
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2013 Nov; 32(11):1979-88. PubMed ID: 23782797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.