These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7572326)

  • 1. Universal standardization for dual X-ray absorptiometry: patient and phantom cross-calibration results.
    Genant HK
    J Bone Miner Res; 1995 Jun; 10(6):997-8. PubMed ID: 7572326
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Universal standardization for dual x-ray absorptiometry: patient and phantom cross-calibration results.
    Genant HK; Grampp S; Glüer CC; Faulkner KG; Jergas M; Engelke K; Hagiwara S; Van Kuijk C
    J Bone Miner Res; 1994 Oct; 9(10):1503-14. PubMed ID: 7817795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Universal standardization of bone density measurements: a method with optimal properties for calibration among several instruments.
    Hui SL; Gao S; Zhou XH; Johnston CC; Lu Y; Glüer CC; Grampp S; Genant H
    J Bone Miner Res; 1997 Sep; 12(9):1463-70. PubMed ID: 9286763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Technical considerations of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry-based bone mineral measurements for pediatric studies.
    Koo WW; Walters J; Bush AJ
    J Bone Miner Res; 1995 Dec; 10(12):1998-2004. PubMed ID: 8619381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Quality control in bone densitometry].
    Kolta S; Roux C
    J Radiol; 1999 Feb; 80(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 10209705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dual x-ray absorptiometry forearm software: accuracy and intermachine relationship.
    Hagiwara S; Engelke K; Yang SO; Dhillon MS; Guglielmi G; Nelson DL; Genant HK
    J Bone Miner Res; 1994 Sep; 9(9):1425-7. PubMed ID: 7817826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reproducibility of DXA absorptiometry: a model for bone loss estimates.
    Fuleihan GE; Testa MA; Angell JE; Porrino N; Leboff MS
    J Bone Miner Res; 1995 Jul; 10(7):1004-14. PubMed ID: 7484275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of four methods for cross-calibrating dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers to eliminate systematic errors when upgrading equipment.
    Finkelstein JS; Butler JP; Cleary RL; Neer RM
    J Bone Miner Res; 1994 Dec; 9(12):1945-52. PubMed ID: 7872060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Cross-calibration of bone volume assessment].
    Yamazaki K
    Nihon Rinsho; 2004 Feb; 62 Suppl 2():309-11. PubMed ID: 15035143
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Calibration of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry for bone density.
    Mazess RB; Trempe JA; Bisek JP; Hanson JA; Hans D
    J Bone Miner Res; 1991 Aug; 6(8):799-806. PubMed ID: 1785372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Manufacture and evaluation of a spine phantom used in the cross-calibration of DXA bone densitometry].
    Yang DZ; Shang JY; Song WZ; Chen J; Zhu D; Wang WZ
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2003 Jun; 25(3):262-6. PubMed ID: 12905736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The accuracy and reproducibility of the measurement of bone mineral content by single-photon absorptiometry (125I). The effect of source strength].
    Cattaneo GM; Rinaldi GP; Rubinacci A
    Radiol Med; 1992; 83(1-2):54-8. PubMed ID: 1557545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quality control of bone densitometry in a national health survey (NHANES III) using three mobile examination centers.
    Wahner HW; Looker A; Dunn WL; Walters LC; Hauser MF; Novak C
    J Bone Miner Res; 1994 Jun; 9(6):951-60. PubMed ID: 8079669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation of accuracy and precision of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry for infants.
    Koo WW; Massom LR; Walters J
    J Bone Miner Res; 1995 Jul; 10(7):1111-5. PubMed ID: 7484287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [A calibration phantom system for QCT bone mineral density determination].
    Yan Q; Yan L; Yang DZ; San HB; Yan ZF
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2005 May; 29(3):173-6. PubMed ID: 16124621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Universal standardization of forearm bone densitometry.
    Shepherd JA; Cheng XG; Lu Y; Njeh C; Toschke J; Engelke K; Grigorian M; Genant HK
    J Bone Miner Res; 2002 Apr; 17(4):734-45. PubMed ID: 11918231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bone mass measurement by DXA: influence of analysis procedures and interunit variation.
    Trevisan C; Gandolini GG; Sibilla P; Penotti M; Caraceni MP; Ortolani S
    J Bone Miner Res; 1992 Dec; 7(12):1373-82. PubMed ID: 1481723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality control of DXA instruments in multicenter trials.
    Faulkner KG; McClung MR
    Osteoporos Int; 1995; 5(4):218-27. PubMed ID: 7492859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cross-calibration and minimum precision standards for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: the 2005 ISCD Official Positions.
    Shepherd JA; Lu Y; Wilson K; Fuerst T; Genant H; Hangartner TN; Wilson C; Hans D; Leib ES;
    J Clin Densitom; 2006; 9(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 16731429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Differences among array, fast array, and high-definition scan modes in bone mineral density measurement at dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry on a phantom.
    Delnevo A; Bandirali M; Di Leo G; Messina C; Sconfienza LM; Aliprandi A; Ulivieri FM; Sardanelli F
    Clin Radiol; 2013 Jun; 68(6):616-9. PubMed ID: 23351778
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.