321 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7572809)
1. Evaluation of a total hematology analysis system (Sysmex HS-430). Benefits for large laboratories by reducing manual work load and optimizing screening efficacy for pathologic samples.
Födinger M; Speiser W; Karabentcheva S; Scherrer R; Veitl M; Schwarzinger I
Am J Clin Pathol; 1995 Nov; 104(5):503-9. PubMed ID: 7572809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance evaluation of the latest fully automated hematology analyzers in a large, commercial laboratory setting: a 4-way, side-by-side study.
Bourner G; Dhaliwal J; Sumner J
Lab Hematol; 2005; 11(4):285-97. PubMed ID: 16475476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotics in the hematology laboratory. An evaluation of the productivity of the Sysmex HS-330.
Rothe M; Wingfield S; Barranco P; Charache S
Am J Clin Pathol; 1995 Feb; 103(2):154-8. PubMed ID: 7856557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automated five-part white blood cell differential counts. Efficiency of software-generated white blood cell suspect flags of the hematology analyzers Sysmex SE-9000, Sysmex NE-8000, and Coulter STKS.
Thalhammer-Scherrer R; Knöbl P; Korninger L; Schwarzinger I
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Jun; 121(6):573-7. PubMed ID: 9199621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Blast flagging of the Sysmex XN-10 hematology analyzer with supervised cell image analysis: Impact on quality parameters.
Petrone J; Jackups R; Eby CS; Shimer G; Anderson J; Frater JL
Int J Lab Hematol; 2019 Oct; 41(5):601-606. PubMed ID: 31162809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A parallel evaluation of four automated hematology analyzers.
Bentley SA; Johnson A; Bishop CA
Am J Clin Pathol; 1993 Dec; 100(6):626-32. PubMed ID: 8249909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Comparison of Mindray BC-6800, Sysmex XN-2000, and Beckman Coulter LH750 Automated Hematology Analyzers: A Pediatric Study.
Ciepiela O; Kotuła I; Kierat S; Sieczkowska S; Podsiadłowska A; Jenczelewska A; Księżarczyk K; Demkow U
J Clin Lab Anal; 2016 Nov; 30(6):1128-1134. PubMed ID: 27184780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the Sysmex CC-800. An automated eight-parameter hematology instrument.
Carlson DA; Ito RK; Statland BE; Daigneault R; DiPierro R; Horion L
Am J Clin Pathol; 1986 Jul; 86(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 3728384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of Mindray BC-5000 hematology analyzer: a new miniature 5-part WBC differential instrument.
Xiang D; Yue J; Lan Y; Sha C; Ren S; Li Y; Li M; Wang C
Int J Lab Hematol; 2015 Oct; 37(5):597-605. PubMed ID: 25944368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Preliminary evaluation of the new hematology analyzer COULTER GEN-S in a university hospital.
Picard F; Gicquel C; Marnet L; Guesnu M; Levy JP
Clin Chem Lab Med; 1999 Jun; 37(6):681-6. PubMed ID: 10475078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the automated hematology analyzer Sysmex XT-2000iV ™ compared to the ADVIA ® 2120 for its use in dogs, cats, and horses. Part II: Accuracy of leukocyte differential and reticulocyte count, impact of anticoagulant and sample aging.
Bauer N; Nakagawa J; Dunker C; Failing K; Moritz A
J Vet Diagn Invest; 2012 Jan; 24(1):74-89. PubMed ID: 22362937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laboratory productivity and the rate of manual peripheral blood smear review: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 95,141 complete blood count determinations performed in 263 institutions.
Novis DA; Walsh M; Wilkinson D; St Louis M; Ben-Ezra J
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2006 May; 130(5):596-601. PubMed ID: 16683868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance evaluation of the digital cell imaging analyzer DI-60 integrated into the fully automated Sysmex XN hematology analyzer system.
Tabe Y; Yamamoto T; Maenou I; Nakai R; Idei M; Horii T; Miida T; Ohsaka A
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2015 Feb; 53(2):281-9. PubMed ID: 25153399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Current status and proposal of a guideline for manual slide review of automated complete blood cell count and white blood cell differential].
Woo HY; Shin SY; Park H; Kim YJ; Kim HJ; Lee YK; Chae SL; Chang YH; Choi JR; Han K; Cho SR; Kwon KC
Korean J Lab Med; 2010 Dec; 30(6):559-66. PubMed ID: 21157139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Guidance for storing blood samples in laboratories performing complete blood count with differential.
Cornet E; Behier C; Troussard X
Int J Lab Hematol; 2012 Dec; 34(6):655-60. PubMed ID: 22823600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of the Sysmex XT-2000iV hematology system for dogs, cats, and horses. I. Erythrocytes, platelets, and total leukocyte counts.
Lilliehöök I; Tvedten H
Vet Clin Pathol; 2009 Jun; 38(2):163-74. PubMed ID: 19392763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The new hematology analyzer Sysmex XE-2100: performance evaluation of a novel white blood cell differential technology.
Ruzicka K; Veitl M; Thalhammer-Scherrer R; Schwarzinger I
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2001 Mar; 125(3):391-6. PubMed ID: 11231489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The international consensus group for hematology review: suggested criteria for action following automated CBC and WBC differential analysis.
Barnes PW; McFadden SL; Machin SJ; Simson E;
Lab Hematol; 2005; 11(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 16024331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the Sysmex NE-8000. Automated hematology analyzer in a high-volume outpatient laboratory.
Brigden ML; Page NE; Graydon C
Am J Clin Pathol; 1993 Dec; 100(6):618-25. PubMed ID: 8249908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimization of laboratory workflow in clinical hematology laboratory with reduced manual slide review: comparison between Sysmex XE-2100 and ABX Pentra DX120.
Hur M; Cho JH; Kim H; Hong MH; Moon HW; Yun YM; Kim JQ
Int J Lab Hematol; 2011 Aug; 33(4):434-40. PubMed ID: 21418541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
