These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7572857)

  • 1. Vertical dimension and therapeutic choices.
    Ortial JP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Oct; 108(4):432-41. PubMed ID: 7572857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nonextraction treatment of a high-angle class II malocclusion: a case report.
    Giancotti A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jun; 117(6):721-7. PubMed ID: 10842116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Vertical skeletal change associated with Andresen, Harvold, and Begg treatment.
    Ball JV; Hunt NP
    Eur J Orthod; 1991 Feb; 13(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 2032567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Facial changes in Puertorican patients as a result of 4 first bicuspid extraction orthodontic treatment using fixed mechanics.
    Cardona A
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2004; 15(2):25-33. PubMed ID: 15298130
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the vertical holding appliance in treatment of high-angle patients.
    Deberardinis M; Stretesky T; Sinha P; Nanda RS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jun; 117(6):700-5. PubMed ID: 10842113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Treatment of an adult patient with severely crowded bimaxillary protrusive Class II malocclusion with atypical extractions.
    Schacter RI; Schacter WM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Sep; 122(3):317-22. PubMed ID: 12226615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cephalometric evaluation of dento-skeletal changes during treatment with the Bionator type 1.
    Carels C; Reychler A; van der Linden FP
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Nov; 24(11):841-8. PubMed ID: 9426166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of a lingual arch appliance with anterior bite plane in deep overbite correction.
    Forsberg CM; Hellsing E
    Eur J Orthod; 1984 May; 6(2):107-15. PubMed ID: 6587967
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The Tweed-Merrifield technic].
    Guibert M; Martinez H
    Orthod Fr; 1999; 70(1):109-26. PubMed ID: 10361828
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. First premolar extractions and fixed appliances in the Class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Carter NE
    Br J Orthod; 1988 Feb; 15(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 3164207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Serial extraction in class II malocclusions.
    Ringenberg QM
    Angle Orthod; 1978 Oct; 48(4):311-6. PubMed ID: 281888
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [A comparative study of cephalometric variation of the skeletal and dentoalveolar structures after treatment with the Begg, Ricketts and edgewise technic in cases of Class I and Class II malocclusions treated with and without extractions].
    Saurel-Passebosc C; Parguel P; Mossé A
    Orthod Fr; 1989; 60 Pt 2():873-94. PubMed ID: 2490264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Treatment with Tip-Edge brackets and differential tooth movement.
    Kesling PC; Rocke RT; Kesling CK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 May; 99(5):387-401. PubMed ID: 2028929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Class II, division 2 malocclusion. To extract--or not extract?
    Litt RA; Nielsen IL
    Angle Orthod; 1984 Apr; 54(2):123-38. PubMed ID: 6588769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [A cephalometric appraisal of the treatment and post-treatment vertical changes in maxillary protrusion cases treated with Begg's technic].
    Shono H
    Shigaku; 1986 Feb; 73(6):1485-524. PubMed ID: 3458105
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Profile changes in Class II, division 1 malocclusions: a comparison of the effects of Edgewise and Fränkel appliance therapy.
    Battagel JM
    Eur J Orthod; 1989 Aug; 11(3):243-53. PubMed ID: 2792214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effectiveness of pendulum, K-loop, and distal jet distalization techniques in growing children and its effects on anchor unit: A comparative study.
    Marure PS; Patil RU; Reddy S; Prakash A; Kshetrimayum N; Shukla R
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2016; 34(4):331-40. PubMed ID: 27681396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Significance of the cant of the posterior occlusal plane in class II division 1 malocclusions.
    Fushima K; Kitamura Y; Mita H; Sato S; Suzuki Y; Kim YH
    Eur J Orthod; 1996 Feb; 18(1):27-40. PubMed ID: 8746175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Skeletal anchorage for vertical control in extraction treatment of dolichofacial patients.
    Chaffee MP; Kim SH; Schudy GF
    J Clin Orthod; 2009 Dec; 43(12):749-62. PubMed ID: 20391851
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A cephalometric investigation of overjet changes in fifty severe Class II division I malocclusions.
    Nashed RR; Reynolds IR
    Br J Orthod; 1989 Feb; 16(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 2923849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.