147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7572968)
1. Re: "Invited commentary: a critical look at some popular meta-analytic methods".
Vandenbroucke JP
Am J Epidemiol; 1995 Nov; 142(9):1007-9. PubMed ID: 7572968
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Re: "A critical look at some popular meta-analytic methods".
Olkin I
Am J Epidemiol; 1994 Aug; 140(3):297-9; discussion 300-1. PubMed ID: 8048979
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Invited commentary: a critical look at some popular meta-analytic methods.
Greenland S
Am J Epidemiol; 1994 Aug; 140(3):290-6. PubMed ID: 8030632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysis.
Ioannidis JP
J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):951-7. PubMed ID: 19018930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Indiscriminate data aggregations in meta-analysis. A cause for concern among policy makers and social scientists.
Lopez-Lee D
Eval Rev; 2002 Oct; 26(5):520-44. PubMed ID: 12243106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Spuriously precise results from meta-analysis. Is better statistical correction or a more critical methodological assessment warranted?
van Amelsvoort LG; Viechtbauer W; Spigt MG
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Feb; 62(2):123-5; discussion 126-7. PubMed ID: 19131014
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Invited commentary: Re: "Multiple comparisons and related issues in the interpretation of epidemiologic data".
Thompson JR
Am J Epidemiol; 1998 May; 147(9):801-6. PubMed ID: 9583708
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The case for failed meta-analyses.
Naylor CD
J Eval Clin Pract; 1995 Nov; 1(2):127-30. PubMed ID: 9238567
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Meta-analysis for orthodontists: Part II--Is all that glitters gold?
Papageorgiou SN
J Orthod; 2014 Dec; 41(4):327-36. PubMed ID: 25404669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Form meets function: A commentary on meta-analytic history.
Rothstein HR
Res Synth Methods; 2015 Sep; 6(3):290-2. PubMed ID: 26097199
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Should an expected number of cases be an integer?
Strömberg U
Epidemiology; 1994 Sep; 5(5):561-2. PubMed ID: 7986875
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. "Meta-Jeopardy": the crisis of representation in qualitative metasynthesis.
Sandelowski M
Nurs Outlook; 2006; 54(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 16487774
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. How to make sense of clinical research.
Wooten JM; Ross VM
RN; 2005 Jan; 68(1):22-7; quiz 28. PubMed ID: 15742745
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Meta-analyses and systematic errors in publications].
Bias R
Wien Med Wochenschr; 2001; 151(1-2):39-40. PubMed ID: 11281127
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. How trustworthy is epidemiologic research?
Vandenbroucke JP
Epidemiology; 1990 Jan; 1(1):83-4. PubMed ID: 2081247
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Re: "Invited commentary: response to Science article, 'Epidemiology faces its limits'".
Acquavella JF; Ramlow JM
Am J Epidemiol; 1997 Mar; 145(5):476. PubMed ID: 9048522
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The meta-analysis of diagnostic test studies.
Boissel J; Cucherat M
Eur Radiol; 1998; 8(3):484-7. PubMed ID: 9510593
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Meta- and statistical analysis of single-case intervention research data: quantitative gifts and a wish list.
Kratochwill TR; Levin JR
J Sch Psychol; 2014 Apr; 52(2):231-5. PubMed ID: 24606977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluating single-case research data for systematic review: a commentary for the special issue.
Maggin DM; Odom SL
J Sch Psychol; 2014 Apr; 52(2):237-41. PubMed ID: 24606978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Statistical methods for assessing the influence of study characteristics on treatment effects in 'meta-epidemiological' research.
Sterne JA; Jüni P; Schulz KF; Altman DG; Bartlett C; Egger M
Stat Med; 2002 Jun; 21(11):1513-24. PubMed ID: 12111917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
