These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7572968)

  • 21. Statistical methods for dealing with publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Jin ZC; Zhou XH; He J
    Stat Med; 2015 Jan; 34(2):343-60. PubMed ID: 25363575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A meta-epidemiological study to examine the association between bias and treatment effects in neonatal trials.
    Bialy L; Vandermeer B; Lacaze-Masmonteil T; Dryden DM; Hartling L
    Evid Based Child Health; 2014 Dec; 9(4):1052-9. PubMed ID: 25504975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Meta-analysis: fact or fiction? How to interpret meta-analyses.
    Huf W; Kalcher K; Pail G; Friedrich ME; Filzmoser P; Kasper S
    World J Biol Psychiatry; 2011 Apr; 12(3):188-200. PubMed ID: 21375365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Graphical methods for detecting bias in meta-analysis.
    Ferrer RL
    Fam Med; 1998 Sep; 30(8):579-83. PubMed ID: 9773289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Invited commentary: old problem, new wrinkles.
    Potter JD
    Am J Epidemiol; 1998 May; 147(10):911-3. PubMed ID: 9596468
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A guide to evaluating epidemiological studies.
    Pallasch TJ
    J N J Dent Assoc; 2000; 71(2):51-3. PubMed ID: 11324066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Can meta-analyses be trusted?
    Thompson SG; Pocock SJ
    Lancet; 1991 Nov; 338(8775):1127-30. PubMed ID: 1682553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Tidal volumes in ARDS and meta-analysis.
    Petrucci N
    Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2003 Mar; 167(6):935; author reply 935-6. PubMed ID: 12653110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [How to read a meta-analysis?].
    Moulis G; Sommet A
    Rev Med Interne; 2014 Apr; 35(4):250-8. PubMed ID: 24029290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. When plagiarism becomes research.
    Katerndahl D
    Fam Pract; 1991 Dec; 8(4):382-3. PubMed ID: 1800205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Considerations for planning and designing meta-analysis in oral medicine.
    Pinto A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Aug; 116(2):194-202. PubMed ID: 23663987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Flaws in critical appraisal.
    Raymond E; Adcock L; Boland MF; MacDonald I; Ogilvie G; Stephenson M
    Can Fam Physician; 1998 Mar; 44():485, 487. PubMed ID: 9559184
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Meta-analysis under the microscope.
    Weed DL
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1997 Jul; 89(13):904-5. PubMed ID: 9214664
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Reflections on the origins of meta-analysis.
    Rosenthal R
    Res Synth Methods; 2015 Sep; 6(3):240-5. PubMed ID: 26355797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis: studies of studies.
    Engberg S
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2008; 35(3):258-65. PubMed ID: 18496080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Clinical trial quality needs to be improved to facilitate metaanalyses.
    Chalmers TC
    Online J Curr Clin Trials; 1993 Sep; Doc No 89():[1541 words; 14 paragraphs]. PubMed ID: 8306015
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Analyzing matrices of meta-analytic correlations: current practices and recommendations.
    Sheng Z; Kong W; Cortina JM; Hou S
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Jun; 7(2):187-208. PubMed ID: 27286903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. What have we learned from meta-analysis?
    Stockler M; Coates A
    Med J Aust; 1993 Sep; 159(5):291-3. PubMed ID: 8361419
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Enhancing the quality and transparency of systematic reviews.
    García-Perdomo HA
    Colomb Med (Cali); 2018 Dec; 49(4):251-253. PubMed ID: 30700916
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A guide to interpreting discordant systematic reviews.
    Jadad AR; Cook DJ; Browman GP
    CMAJ; 1997 May; 156(10):1411-6. PubMed ID: 9164400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.