117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7573651)
1. The effect of femoral tunnel position and graft tensioning technique on posterior laxity of the posterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee.
Burns WC; Draganich LF; Pyevich M; Reider B
Am J Sports Med; 1995; 23(4):424-30. PubMed ID: 7573651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A biomechanical study of replacement of the posterior cruciate ligament with a graft. Part 1: Isometry, pre-tension of the graft, and anterior-posterior laxity.
Markolf KL; Slauterbeck JR; Armstrong KL; Shapiro MS; Finerman GA
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1997 Mar; 79(3):375-80. PubMed ID: 9070526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of femoral attachment location on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: graft tension patterns and restoration of normal anterior-posterior laxity patterns.
Zavras TD; Race A; Amis AA
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2005 Mar; 13(2):92-100. PubMed ID: 15756613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Knee stability and graft function following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Comparison between 11 o'clock and 10 o'clock femoral tunnel placement. 2002 Richard O'Connor Award paper.
Loh JC; Fukuda Y; Tsuda E; Steadman RJ; Fu FH; Woo SL
Arthroscopy; 2003 Mar; 19(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 12627155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reconstruction of knees with combined cruciate deficiencies: a biomechanical study.
Markolf KL; O'Neill G; Jackson SR; McAllister DR
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Sep; 85(9):1768-74. PubMed ID: 12954836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical studies of double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions.
Markolf KL; Feeley BT; Jackson SR; McAllister DR
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Aug; 88(8):1788-94. PubMed ID: 16882903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vitro study of knee stability after posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Pearsall AW 4TH ; Pyevich M; Draganich LF; Larkin JJ; Reider B
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1996 Jun; (327):264-71. PubMed ID: 8641073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of the angle of the femoral and tibial tunnels in the coronal plane and incremental excision of the posterior cruciate ligament on tension of an anterior cruciate ligament graft: an in vitro study.
Simmons R; Howell SM; Hull ML
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Jun; 85(6):1018-29. PubMed ID: 12783997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Varying femoral tunnels between the anatomical footprint and isometric positions: effect on kinematics of the anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee.
Musahl V; Plakseychuk A; VanScyoc A; Sasaki T; Debski RE; McMahon PJ; Fu FH
Am J Sports Med; 2005 May; 33(5):712-8. PubMed ID: 15722268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Single- versus double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: effects of femoral tunnel separation.
Markolf KL; Jackson SR; McAllister DR
Am J Sports Med; 2010 Jun; 38(6):1141-6. PubMed ID: 20348284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A biomechanical comparison of tibial inlay and tibial tunnel posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques: graft pretension and knee laxity.
McAllister DR; Markolf KL; Oakes DA; Young CR; McWilliams J
Am J Sports Med; 2002; 30(3):312-7. PubMed ID: 12016068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A biomechanical study of replacement of the posterior cruciate ligament with a graft. Part II: Forces in the graft compared with forces in the intact ligament.
Markolf KL; Slauterbeck JR; Armstrong KL; Shapiro MS; Finerman GA
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1997 Mar; 79(3):381-6. PubMed ID: 9070527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical consequences of replacement of the anterior cruciate ligament with a patellar ligament allograft. Part I: insertion of the graft and anterior-posterior testing.
Markolf KL; Burchfield DM; Shapiro MM; Davis BR; Finerman GA; Slauterbeck JL
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1996 Nov; 78(11):1720-7. PubMed ID: 8934488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Characterization of cruciate ligament impingement: the influence of femoral or tibial tunnel positioning at different degrees of knee flexion.
Astur DC; Santos CV; Aleluia V; Astur Neto N; Arliani GG; Kaleka CC; Skaf A; Cohen M
Arthroscopy; 2013 May; 29(5):913-9. PubMed ID: 23419357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Where should the femoral tunnel of a posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction be placed to best restore anteroposterior laxity and ligament forces?
Markolf KL; Feeley BT; Jackson SR; McAllister DR
Am J Sports Med; 2006 Apr; 34(4):604-11. PubMed ID: 16365374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of different femoral tunnel positions on tension changes in anterolateral ligament reconstruction.
Katakura M; Koga H; Nakamura K; Sekiya I; Muneta T
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2017 Apr; 25(4):1272-1278. PubMed ID: 27225889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The relationship between graft tensioning and the anterior-posterior laxity in the anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed goat knee.
Fleming BC; Abate JA; Peura GD; Beynnon BD
J Orthop Res; 2001 Sep; 19(5):841-4. PubMed ID: 11562130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Novel Small Animal Model of Differential Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Graft Strain.
Ma R; Ju X; Deng XH; Rodeo SA
J Knee Surg; 2015 Dec; 28(6):489-95. PubMed ID: 25343473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Tensioning of remnant posterior cruciate ligament and reconstruction of anterolateral bundle in chronic posterior cruciate ligament injury.
Jung YB; Jung HJ; Tae SK; Lee YS; Yang DL
Arthroscopy; 2006 Mar; 22(3):329-38. PubMed ID: 16517318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Correlation of graft position, knee laxity and clinical outcome: comparison with native anterior cruciate ligament using magnetic resonance imaging study.
Saowaprut S; Tanpowpong T; Piyaskulkaew C
J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Apr; 92(4):510-6. PubMed ID: 19374302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
