185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7574122)
1. Cost-effectiveness analysis of the Ottawa Ankle Rules.
Anis AH; Stiell IG; Stewart DG; Laupacis A
Ann Emerg Med; 1995 Oct; 26(4):422-8. PubMed ID: 7574122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Implementation of the Ottawa ankle rules.
Stiell IG; McKnight RD; Greenberg GH; McDowell I; Nair RC; Wells GA; Johns C; Worthington JR
JAMA; 1994 Mar; 271(11):827-32. PubMed ID: 8114236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the Ottawa clinical decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle and midfoot injuries in the emergency department: an independent site assessment.
Pigman EC; Klug RK; Sanford S; Jolly BT
Ann Emerg Med; 1994 Jul; 24(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 7912053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiography in acute ankle injuries: the Ottawa Ankle Rules versus local diagnostic decision rules.
Pijnenburg AC; Glas AS; De Roos MA; Bogaard K; Lijmer JG; Bossuyt PM; Butzelaar RM; Keeman JN
Ann Emerg Med; 2002 Jun; 39(6):599-604. PubMed ID: 12023701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multicentre trial to introduce the Ottawa ankle rules for use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Multicentre Ankle Rule Study Group.
Stiell I; Wells G; Laupacis A; Brison R; Verbeek R; Vandemheen K; Naylor CD
BMJ; 1995 Sep; 311(7005):594-7. PubMed ID: 7663253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Retrospective comparison of the Low Risk Ankle Rules and the Ottawa Ankle Rules in a pediatric population.
Ellenbogen AL; Rice AL; Vyas P
Am J Emerg Med; 2017 Sep; 35(9):1262-1265. PubMed ID: 28363615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of the Ottawa ankle rules in France: a study in the surgical emergency department of a teaching hospital.
Auleley GR; Kerboull L; Durieux P; Cosquer M; Courpied JP; Ravaud P
Ann Emerg Med; 1998 Jul; 32(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 9656943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of diagnostic decision rules and structured data collection in assessment of acute ankle injury.
Glas AS; Pijnenburg BA; Lijmer JG; Bogaard K; de RM; Keeman JN; Butzelaar RM; Bossuyt PM
CMAJ; 2002 Mar; 166(6):727-33. PubMed ID: 11944759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Utilization of radiographs for the diagnosis of ankle fractures in Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Dowdall H; Gee M; Brison RJ; Pickett W
Acad Emerg Med; 2011 May; 18(5):555-8. PubMed ID: 21545671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Awareness and use of the Ottawa ankle and knee rules in 5 countries: can publication alone be enough to change practice?
Graham ID; Stiell IG; Laupacis A; McAuley L; Howell M; Clancy M; Durieux P; Simon N; Emparanza JI; Aginaga JR; O'connor A; Wells G
Ann Emerg Med; 2001 Mar; 37(3):259-66. PubMed ID: 11223761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prospective evaluation of the Ottawa Ankle Rules in a university sports medicine center. With a modification to increase specificity for identifying malleolar fractures.
Leddy JJ; Smolinski RJ; Lawrence J; Snyder JL; Priore RL
Am J Sports Med; 1998; 26(2):158-65. PubMed ID: 9548106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost Consequence Analysis of Implementing the Low Risk Ankle Rule in Emergency Departments.
Boutis K; von Keyserlingk C; Willan A; Narayanan UG; Brison R; Grootendorst P; Plint AC; Parker M; Goeree R
Ann Emerg Med; 2015 Nov; 66(5):455-463.e4. PubMed ID: 26187612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospective survey to verify the Ottawa ankle rules.
Perry S; Raby N; Grant PT
J Accid Emerg Med; 1999 Jul; 16(4):258-60. PubMed ID: 10417931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An economic analysis of the Ottawa knee rule.
Nichol G; Stiell IG; Wells GA; Juergensen LS; Laupacis A
Ann Emerg Med; 1999 Oct; 34(4 Pt 1):438-47. PubMed ID: 10499943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A pooled analysis of the Ottawa ankle rules used on adults in the ED.
Markert RJ; Walley ME; Guttman TG; Mehta R
Am J Emerg Med; 1998 Oct; 16(6):564-7. PubMed ID: 9786538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sensitivity of the Ottawa rules.
Lucchesi GM; Jackson RE; Peacock WF; Cerasani C; Swor RA
Ann Emerg Med; 1995 Jul; 26(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 7793707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of the Ottawa ankle rules by nurse practitioners.
Mann CJ; Grant I; Guly H; Hughes P
J Accid Emerg Med; 1998 Sep; 15(5):315-6. PubMed ID: 9785158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective validation and head-to-head comparison of 3 ankle rules in a pediatric population.
Gravel J; Hedrei P; Grimard G; Gouin S
Ann Emerg Med; 2009 Oct; 54(4):534-540.e1. PubMed ID: 19647341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Refinement and prospective validation.
Stiell IG; Greenberg GH; McKnight RD; Nair RC; McDowell I; Reardon M; Stewart JP; Maloney J
JAMA; 1993 Mar; 269(9):1127-32. PubMed ID: 8433468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation of Ottawa ankle rules protocol in Greek athletes: study in the emergency departments of a district general hospital and a sports injuries clinic.
Papacostas E; Malliaropoulos N; Papadopoulos A; Liouliakis C
Br J Sports Med; 2001 Dec; 35(6):445-7. PubMed ID: 11726486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
