These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
29. Clinical experience with the Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprosthesis: short-term results (from 2 to 4.5 years). Gallo I; Ruiz B; Duran CM Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1983 Oct; 31(5):277-81. PubMed ID: 6196860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Actuarial versus actual freedom from structural valve deterioration with the Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprostheses. Jamieson WR; Burr LH; Miyagishima RT; Germann E; Anderson WN Can J Cardiol; 1999 Sep; 15(9):973-8. PubMed ID: 10504178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Age as a determinant for selection of porcine bioprostheses for cardiac valve replacement: experience with Carpentier-Edwards standard bioprosthesis. Jamieson WR; Tyers GF; Janusz MT; Miyagishima RT; Munro AI; Ling H; Burr LH; Tutassaura H Can J Cardiol; 1991 May; 7(4):181-8. PubMed ID: 2070287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Randomised, prospective evaluation of a new pericardial heart valve: outcome after seven years. Wheatley DJ; Tolland MM; Pathi V; Bernacca GM; Murray GD; Davidson KG; Breeze P; Cobbe SM Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1995; 9(5):259-67; discussion 267-8. PubMed ID: 7662379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Experience with 813 aortic or mitral valve replacements with the Carpentier-Edwards bioprosthesis: Five year results. Soots G; Pieronne A; Roux JP; Stankowiak C; Warembourg H; Watel A; Prat A; Segbeya A; Maatouk M; Crepin F Eur Heart J; 1984 Oct; 5 Suppl D():87-94. PubMed ID: 6519107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Fifteen years follow up with the St. Jude Medical Biocor porcine bioprosthesis. Mykén P; Bech-Hanssen O; Phipps B; Caidahl K J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 May; 9(3):415-22. PubMed ID: 10888100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Porcine cardiac bioprostheses: evaluation of long-term results in 990 patients. Zussa C; Ottino G; di Summa M; Poletti GA; Zattera GF; Pansini S; Morea M Ann Thorac Surg; 1985 Mar; 39(3):243-50. PubMed ID: 3977465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of the Sorin bicarbon bileaflet valve in 488 patients (519 prostheses). Goldsmith I; Lip GY; Patel RL Am J Cardiol; 1999 Apr; 83(7):1069-74. PubMed ID: 10190522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Structural valve deterioration in mitral replacement surgery: comparison of Carpentier-Edwards supra-annular porcine and perimount pericardial bioprostheses. Eric Jamieson WR; Marchand MA; Pelletier CL; Norton R; Pellerin M; Dubiel TW; Aupart MR; Daenen WJ; Holden MP; David TE; Ryba EA; Anderson WN J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1999 Aug; 118(2):297-304. PubMed ID: 10425003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Porcine versus pericardial bioprostheses: eleven-year follow up of a prospective randomized trial. Chaudhry MA; Raco L; Muriithi EW; Bernacca GM; Tolland MM; Wheatley DJ J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 May; 9(3):429-37; discussion 437-8. PubMed ID: 10888102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Long-term follow up of patients undergoing reoperative surgery with aortic or mitral valve replacement using a St. Jude Medical prosthesis. Emery RW; Krogh CC; McAdams S; Emery AM; Holter AR J Heart Valve Dis; 2010 Jul; 19(4):473-84. PubMed ID: 20845896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]