156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7575799)
1. Comparison of cardiac output measurements by thermodilution and thoracic electrical bioimpedance in critically ill versus non-critically ill patients.
Weiss S; Calloway E; Cairo J; Granger W; Winslow J
Am J Emerg Med; 1995 Nov; 13(6):626-31. PubMed ID: 7575799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Simultaneous comparison of thoracic bioimpedance and arterial pulse waveform-derived cardiac output with thermodilution measurement.
Hirschl MM; Kittler H; Woisetschläger C; Siostrzonek P; Staudinger T; Kofler J; Oschatz E; Bur A; Gwechenberger M; Laggner AN
Crit Care Med; 2000 Jun; 28(6):1798-802. PubMed ID: 10890622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measurement of cardiac output with non-invasive Aesculon impedance versus thermodilution.
Petter H; Erik A; Björn E; Göran R
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2011 Jan; 31(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 21143753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Noninvasive assessment of cardiac output using thoracic electrical bioimpedance in hemodynamically stable and unstable patients after cardiac surgery: a comparison with pulmonary artery thermodilution.
Suttner S; Schöllhorn T; Boldt J; Mayer J; Röhm KD; Lang K; Piper SN
Intensive Care Med; 2006 Dec; 32(12):2053-8. PubMed ID: 17039348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of cardiac output determined by bioimpedance, thermodilution, and the Fick method.
Engoren M; Barbee D
Am J Crit Care; 2005 Jan; 14(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 15608107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The accuracy of bioimpedance cardiography in the measurement of cardiac output in comparison with thermodilution method.
Wong KL; Hou PC
Acta Anaesthesiol Sin; 1996 Jun; 34(2):55-9. PubMed ID: 9084523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Measurement of cardiac output by thoracic electrical bioimpedance or thermodilution].
Jacob F; Mariot J; Frisoni A; Perrier JF; Voltz C; Strub P; Ethévenot G
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim; 1988; 7(3):264-7. PubMed ID: 3408040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Thoracic electrical bioimpedance versus thermodilution in patients post open-heart surgery.
Zácek P; Kunes P; Kobzová E; Dominik J
Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove); 1999; 42(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 10566176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Thoracic electrical bioimpedance: a non-invasive measure of cardiac output for porcine research.
Broomhead CJ; Wright SJ; Kiff KM; Withington PS
Lab Anim; 1998 Jul; 32(3):324-9. PubMed ID: 9718481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of a new semi-continuous cardiac output system in the intensive care unit.
Seguin P; Colcanap O; Le Rouzo A; Tanguy M; Guillou YM; Mallédant Y
Can J Anaesth; 1998 Jun; 45(6):578-83. PubMed ID: 9669016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Determination of cardiac output during positive end-expiratory pressure--noninvasive electrical bioimpedance compared with standard thermodilution.
Castor G; Molter G; Helms J; Niedermark I; Altmayer P
Crit Care Med; 1990 May; 18(5):544-6. PubMed ID: 2183967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reproducibility and comparison of cardiac output measurement by transthoracic bioimpedance and thermodilution methods in critically ill patients.
Ng HW; Coleman N; Walley TJ; Mostafa SM; Breckenridge AM
Clin Intensive Care; 1993; 4(5):217-21. PubMed ID: 10146700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Non-invasive cardiac output by transthoracic electrical bioimpedence in post-cardiac surgery patients: comparison with thermodilution method.
Gujjar AR; Muralidhar K; Banakal S; Gupta R; Sathyaprabha TN; Jairaj PS
J Clin Monit Comput; 2008 Jun; 22(3):175-80. PubMed ID: 18418719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of thoracic electrical bioimpedance as a porcine research tool.
Broomhead CJ; Wright SJ; Kiff KM; Withington PS
Br J Anaesth; 1997 Mar; 78(3):323-5. PubMed ID: 9135316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cardiac output measurement in critical care patients: Thoracic Electrical Bioimpedance versus thermodilution.
Clancy TV; Norman K; Reynolds R; Covington D; Maxwell JG
J Trauma; 1991 Aug; 31(8):1116-20; discussion 1120-1. PubMed ID: 1875438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of a continuous cardiac output and mixed venous oxygen saturation catheter in critically ill surgical patients.
Burchell SA; Yu M; Takiguchi SA; Ohta RM; Myers SA
Crit Care Med; 1997 Mar; 25(3):388-91. PubMed ID: 9118651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Equivalence of bioimpedance and thermodilution in measuring cardiac index after cardiac surgery.
Sageman WS; Riffenburgh RH; Spiess BD
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2002 Feb; 16(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 11854871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of continuous cardiac output monitoring derived from regional impedance cardiography with continuous thermodilution technique in cardiac surgical patients.
Bhavya G; Nagaraja PS; Singh NG; Ragavendran S; Sathish N; Manjunath N; Kumar KA; Nayak VB
Ann Card Anaesth; 2020; 23(2):189-192. PubMed ID: 32275034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of a thoracic bioimpedance cardiac output monitor during cardiac catheterization.
Barin E; Haryadi DG; Schookin SI; Westenskow DR; Zubenko VG; Beliaev KR; Morozov AA
Crit Care Med; 2000 Mar; 28(3):698-702. PubMed ID: 10752817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
