238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7575963)
1. Adhesion of restorations to impression materials.
Millstein PL; Maya A; Segura JC
Int J Prosthodont; 1995; 8(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 7575963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bond strength of three nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials to a light-activated resin tray.
Payne JA; Pereira BP
Int J Prosthodont; 1992; 5(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 1520444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An evaluation of the fit of metal-ceramic restorations made with an autoclaved silicone-based impression material.
Kollefrath R; Savary M; Schwela J
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Jul; 11(4):E063-70. PubMed ID: 20953566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
Lee H; Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Feng C
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A laboratory investigation of the accuracy of two impression techniques for single-tooth implants.
Daoudi MF; Setchell DJ; Searson LJ
Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(2):152-8. PubMed ID: 11843452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pre- and post-set hydrophilicity of elastomeric impression materials.
Michalakis KX; Bakopoulou A; Hirayama H; Garefis DP; Garefis PD
J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):238-48. PubMed ID: 17559537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Shear bond strengths of 2 intraoral porcelain repair systems to porcelain or metal substrates.
Haselton DR; Diaz-Arnold AM; Dunne JT
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Nov; 86(5):526-31. PubMed ID: 11725281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The dynamic interaction of water with four dental impression materials during cure.
Hosseinpour D; Berg JC
J Prosthodont; 2009 Jun; 18(4):292-300. PubMed ID: 19210607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of tray material and surface condition on the shear bond strength of impression materials.
Wang RR; Nguyen T; Boyle AM
J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Nov; 74(5):449-54. PubMed ID: 8809248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Temperature effects on the rheological properties of current polyether and polysiloxane impression materials during setting.
Berg JC; Johnson GH; Lepe X; Adán-Plaza S
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug; 90(2):150-61. PubMed ID: 12886208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detail reproduction, contact angles, and die hardness of elastomeric impression and gypsum die material combinations.
Ragain JC; Grosko ML; Raj M; Ryan TN; Johnston WM
Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 11203635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adhesion of elastomeric impression materials to trays.
Bindra B; Heath JR
J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Jan; 24(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 9049922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of disinfection of custom tray materials on adhesive properties of several impression material systems.
Thompson GA; Vermilyea SG; Agar JR
J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Dec; 72(6):651-6. PubMed ID: 7853264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of custom tray material type and surface treatment on the tensile bond strength of an impression material/adhesive system.
Dixon DL; Breeding LC; Bosser MJ; Nafso AJ
Int J Prosthodont; 1993; 6(3):303-6. PubMed ID: 8397701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Marginal and internal fit of metal-ceramic crowns fabricated with a new laser melting technology.
Quante K; Ludwig K; Kern M
Dent Mater; 2008 Oct; 24(10):1311-5. PubMed ID: 18384869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A study on the adhesion of restorative materials to irreversible hydrocolloid impression materials.
Güldag MU; Yesil D
Int Dent J; 2002 Dec; 52(6):475-9. PubMed ID: 12553404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Moisture effect on polyether and polyvinylsiloxane dimensional accuracy and detail reproduction.
Walker MP; Petrie CS; Haj-Ali R; Spencer P; Dumas C; Williams K
J Prosthodont; 2005 Sep; 14(3):158-63. PubMed ID: 16336232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Composite indirect-direct method for fabricating multiple-unit provisional restorations.
Dumbrigue HB
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jan; 89(1):86-8. PubMed ID: 12589294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Tear and energy properties of three impression materials.
Hondrum SO
Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(6):517-21. PubMed ID: 7748444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of custom tray material type and adhesive drying time on the tensile bond strength of an impression material/adhesive system.
Dixon DL; Breeding LC; Brown JS
Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 8003192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
