These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7575963)

  • 21. Evaluation of the elastic recovery of polyether impression materials.
    Endo T; Finger WJ
    Am J Dent; 2005 Dec; 18(6):355-60. PubMed ID: 16433407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effect of selected variables on the retention of irreversible hydrocolloid impression material.
    Al-Athel MS
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Sep; 9(6):57-64. PubMed ID: 18784860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Influence of tray rigidity and impression technique on accuracy of polyvinyl siloxane impressions.
    Hoyos A; Soderholm KJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 21210004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Working times of elastomeric impression materials according to dimensional stability and detail reproduction.
    Tan E; Chai J
    Int J Prosthodont; 1995; 8(6):541-7. PubMed ID: 8595114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Failure modes with point loading of three commercially available denture teeth.
    Moffitt AR; Woody RD; Parel SM; Miller BH
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Aug; 17(6):432-8. PubMed ID: 18482363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of margin angles of collarless metal ceramic restorations.
    Dalvit DL; Parker MH; Cameron SM; Hawkins MC; Agar JR; Brousseau JS
    Gen Dent; 2004; 52(2):148-50. PubMed ID: 15101310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of composite resin-to-porcelain bond strength with three adhesives.
    Kelsey WP; Latta MA; Stanislav CM; Shaddy RS
    Gen Dent; 2000; 48(4):418-21. PubMed ID: 11199616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A study of the "thixotropic" property of elastomeric impression materials.
    Chai J; Pang IC
    Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(2):155-8. PubMed ID: 8003196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of chemical disinfectant solutions on the stability and accuracy of the dental impression complex.
    Rios MP; Morgano SM; Stein RS; Rose L
    J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Oct; 76(4):356-62. PubMed ID: 8897290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. How to take an accurate, stress-free impression.
    Polan MA
    Dent Today; 2004 Mar; 23(3):80, 82-3. PubMed ID: 15060914
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effect of various interim fixed prosthodontic materials on the polymerization of elastomeric impression materials.
    Al-Sowygh ZH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):176-81. PubMed ID: 24559525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Changes in properties of nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials after storage of components.
    Hondrum SO
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jan; 85(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 11174682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Working time of elastomeric impression materials: relevance of rheological tests.
    Balkenhol M; Kanehira M; Finger WJ; Wöstmann B
    Am J Dent; 2007 Dec; 20(6):347-52. PubMed ID: 18269123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The influence of five impression techniques on the dimensional accuracy of master models.
    Fenske C
    Braz Dent J; 2000; 11(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 11210270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Gingival sulcus simulation model for evaluating the penetration characteristics of elastomeric impression materials.
    Aimjirakul P; Masuda T; Takahashi H; Miura H
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(4):385-9. PubMed ID: 12956493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of mixing technique on shrinkage rate of one polyether and two polyvinyl siloxane impression materials.
    Lampé I; Marton S; Hegedüs C
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(5):590. PubMed ID: 15543917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Hydrophilicity of unset and set elastomeric impression materials.
    Rupp F; Geis-Gerstorfer J
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(6):552-4. PubMed ID: 21209992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Impression techniques and misfit-induced strains on implant-supported superstructures: an in vitro study.
    Cehreli MC; Akça K
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Aug; 26(4):379-85. PubMed ID: 16939020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. In vitro evaluation of long-term bonding of Procera AllCeram alumina restorations with a modified resin luting agent.
    Blatz MB; Sadan A; Arch GH; Lang BR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Apr; 89(4):381-7. PubMed ID: 12690351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Changes in water contact angles during the first phase of setting of dental impression materials.
    Mondon M; Ziegler C
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 12675455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.