226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7576417)
1. Strong quasi-experimental designs for research on the effectiveness of rehabilitation.
Johnston MV; Ottenbacher KJ; Reichardt CS
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 1995; 74(5):383-92. PubMed ID: 7576417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Practice-based evidence research in rehabilitation: an alternative to randomized controlled trials and traditional observational studies.
Horn SD; DeJong G; Deutscher D
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Aug; 93(8 Suppl):S127-37. PubMed ID: 22840879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Overview of clinical trials in medical rehabilitation: impetuses, challenges, and needed future directions.
Fuhrer MJ
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2003 Oct; 82(10 Suppl):S8-15. PubMed ID: 14502033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of occupational health interventions using a randomized controlled trial: challenges and alternative research designs.
Schelvis RM; Oude Hengel KM; Burdorf A; Blatter BM; Strijk JE; van der Beek AJ
Scand J Work Environ Health; 2015 Sep; 41(5):491-503. PubMed ID: 26030719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quasi experimental designs in pharmacist intervention research.
Krass I
Int J Clin Pharm; 2016 Jun; 38(3):647-54. PubMed ID: 26825756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Research Designs for Intervention Research with Small Samples II: Stepped Wedge and Interrupted Time-Series Designs.
Fok CC; Henry D; Allen J
Prev Sci; 2015 Oct; 16(7):967-77. PubMed ID: 26017633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?
Allen D; Rixson L
Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110. PubMed ID: 21631815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical trials in rehabilitation: what are the obstacles?
Whyte J
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2003 Oct; 82(10 Suppl):S16-21. PubMed ID: 14502034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quasi-experimental study designs series-paper 2: complementary approaches to advancing global health knowledge.
Geldsetzer P; Fawzi W
J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Sep; 89():12-16. PubMed ID: 28365307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inclusion of quasi-experimental studies in systematic reviews of health systems research.
Rockers PC; Røttingen JA; Shemilt I; Tugwell P; Bärnighausen T
Health Policy; 2015 Apr; 119(4):511-21. PubMed ID: 25776033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs in implementation research.
Miller CJ; Smith SN; Pugatch M
Psychiatry Res; 2020 Jan; 283():112452. PubMed ID: 31255320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quasi-experimental study designs series-paper 6: risk of bias assessment.
Waddington H; Aloe AM; Becker BJ; Djimeu EW; Hombrados JG; Tugwell P; Wells G; Reeves B
J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Sep; 89():43-52. PubMed ID: 28351693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evidence-based practice: methods to evaluate individual patient improvement.
Ottenbacher KJ; Hinderer SR
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2001 Oct; 80(10):786-96. PubMed ID: 11562563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Improving health care practices and organization: methodology for intervention studies].
Zaugg V; Savoldelli V; Sabatier B; Durieux P
Sante Publique; 2014; 26(4):519-29. PubMed ID: 25380267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. False Dichotomies and Health Policy Research Designs: Randomized Trials Are Not Always the Answer.
Soumerai SB; Ceccarelli R; Koppel R
J Gen Intern Med; 2017 Feb; 32(2):204-209. PubMed ID: 27757714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Magic Mirror, on the Wall-Which Is the Right Study Design of Them All?-Part I.
Vetter TR
Anesth Analg; 2017 Jun; 124(6):2068-2073. PubMed ID: 28525516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quasi-experimental study designs series-paper 7: assessing the assumptions.
Bärnighausen T; Oldenburg C; Tugwell P; Bommer C; Ebert C; Barreto M; Djimeu E; Haber N; Waddington H; Rockers P; Sianesi B; Bor J; Fink G; Valentine J; Tanner J; Stanley T; Sierra E; Tchetgen ET; Atun R; Vollmer S
J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Sep; 89():53-66. PubMed ID: 28365306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The renaissance of field experimentation in evaluating interventions.
Shadish WR; Cook TD
Annu Rev Psychol; 2009; 60():607-29. PubMed ID: 18616391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intervention research: Appraising study designs, interpreting findings and creating research in clinical practice.
Ebbels SH
Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2017 Jun; 19(3):218-231. PubMed ID: 28084100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Case studies, single-subject research, and N of 1 randomized trials: comparisons and contrasts.
Backman CL; Harris SR
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 1999; 78(2):170-6. PubMed ID: 10088595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
