These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7576500)
1. Evaluation of the BBL Crystal Enteric/Nonfermenter kit for the identification of water-derived environmental Enterobacteriaceae. Micklewright IJ; Sartory DP Lett Appl Microbiol; 1995 Sep; 21(3):160-3. PubMed ID: 7576500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Crystal Enteric/Nonfermenter system, API 20E system, and Vitek AutoMicrobic system for identification of gram-negative bacilli. Robinson A; McCarter YS; Tetreault J J Clin Microbiol; 1995 Feb; 33(2):364-70. PubMed ID: 7714193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of two BBL Crystal systems for identification of some clinically important gram-negative bacteria. Holmes B; Costas M; Thaker T; Stevens M J Clin Microbiol; 1994 Sep; 32(9):2221-4. PubMed ID: 7814550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparative study of the BBL crystal enteric/nonfermenter identification system and the biomerieux API20E and API20NE identification systems after overnight incubation. Varettas K; Mukerjee C; Schmidt M Pathology; 1995 Oct; 27(4):358-61. PubMed ID: 8771156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of BBL Crystal ANR ID Kit and API rapid ID 32 A for identification of anaerobic bacteria. Moll WM; Ungerechts J; Marklein G; Schaal KP Zentralbl Bakteriol; 1996 Jul; 284(2-3):329-47. PubMed ID: 8837394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of the API 20E system to identify veterinary Enterobacteriaceae. Swanson EC; Collins MT J Clin Microbiol; 1980 Jul; 12(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 6999012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of Vitek GNI+ and Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems Crystal E/NF identification systems for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae and other gram-negative, glucose-fermenting and non-glucose-fermenting bacilli. O'Hara CM; Westbrook GL; Miller JM J Clin Microbiol; 1997 Dec; 35(12):3269-73. PubMed ID: 9399532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Using SIB and API kits to identify and biotype enterobacteria of different origin. Kulinich LI; Fish NG; Mazitova OP; Dratvin SA; Birger MO J Hyg Epidemiol Microbiol Immunol; 1987; 31(3):287-92. PubMed ID: 3316379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reevaluation of the API 20E identification system versus conventional biochemicals for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae: a new look at an old product. O'Hara CM; Rhoden DL; Miller JM J Clin Microbiol; 1992 Jan; 30(1):123-5. PubMed ID: 1734043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative evaluation of the Eiken and API 20E systems and conventional methods for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae. Castillo CB; Bruckner DA J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Oct; 20(4):754-7. PubMed ID: 6490860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of micro-ID and API 20E in rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Gooch WM; Hill GA J Clin Microbiol; 1982 May; 15(5):885-90. PubMed ID: 7047556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of a new identification system, Crystal Enteric/Non-Fermenter, for gram-negative bacilli. Wauters G; Boel A; Voorn GP; Verhaegen J; Meunier F; Janssens M; Verbist L J Clin Microbiol; 1995 Apr; 33(4):845-9. PubMed ID: 7790449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Differences in the API 20E biochemical patterns of clinical and environmental Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolates. Martinez-Urtaza J; Lozano-Leon A; ViƱa-Feas A; de Novoa J; Garcia-Martin O FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2006 Feb; 255(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 16436064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical evaluation of the MICRO-ID, API 20E, and conventional media systems for identification of Enterobacteriacea. Edberg SC; Atkinson B; Chambers C; Moore MH; Palumbo L; Zorzon CF; Singer JM J Clin Microbiol; 1979 Aug; 10(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 389946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of Micro-ID, for identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Izard D; Gavini F; Ochin D; Enayeh E; Leclerc H Pathol Biol (Paris); 1980 Dec; 28(10):681-4. PubMed ID: 7008005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Anomalous but helpful findings from the BBL Crystal ID kit with Haemophilus spp. Hamilton-Miller JM; Shah S Lett Appl Microbiol; 1996 Jul; 23(1):47-8. PubMed ID: 8679142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae: evaluation of 3 commercial systems]. Sala A; Dore R; Raffaele L; Cappello P Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1985 Jun; 21(2):214-24. PubMed ID: 4080964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of an automated system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae and nonfermenting bacilli. Jossart MF; Courcol RJ Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1999 Dec; 18(12):902-7. PubMed ID: 10691205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of two commerical methods for the identification of the Enterobacteriaceae--API 20E and the Enterotube--with conventional methods. Hayek LJ; Willis GW J Clin Pathol; 1976 Feb; 29(2):158-61. PubMed ID: 777035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the Quantum II and Rapid E identification systems. Murray PR; Gauthier A; Niles A J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Sep; 20(3):509-14. PubMed ID: 6386866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]