These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

522 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7577731)

  • 1. Retention of orthodontic bands with three different cements.
    Kocadereli I; Ciger S
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1995; 19(2):127-30. PubMed ID: 7577731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparative study of retentive strengths of zinc phosphate, polycarboxylate and glass ionomer cements with stainless steel crowns--an in vitro study.
    Reddy R; Basappa N; Reddy VV
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 1998 Mar; 16(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 11813717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Retention of orthodontic bands with new fluoride-releasing cements.
    Norris DS; McInnes-Ledoux P; Schwaninger B; Weinberg R
    Am J Orthod; 1986 Mar; 89(3):206-11. PubMed ID: 3513596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of shear-peel band strengths of 5 orthodontic cements.
    Aggarwal M; Foley TF; Rix D
    Angle Orthod; 2000 Aug; 70(4):308-16. PubMed ID: 10961781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparative study of retentive strengths of zinc phosphate, polycarboxylate and glass ionomer cements with stainless steel crowns - an in vitro study.
    Raghunath Reddy MH; Subba Reddy VV; Basappa N
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2010; 28(4):245-50. PubMed ID: 21273711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of recementation on crown retention.
    Ayad MF; Rosenstiel SF; Woelfel JB
    Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 9709609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vitro comparison of orthodontic band cements.
    Millett DT; Duff S; Morrison L; Cummings A; Gilmour WH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Jan; 123(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 12532057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Retention strengths of five luting cements on prefabricated dowels after root canal obturation with a zinc oxide/eugenol sealer: 1. Dowel space preparation/cementation at one week after obturation.
    Hagge MS; Wong RD; Lindemuth JS
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Sep; 11(3):168-75. PubMed ID: 12237797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of sandblasting on the retention of orthodontic bands.
    Wood DP; Paleczny GJ; Johnson LN
    Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(3):207-14. PubMed ID: 8805916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Enamel demineralization inhibition by cements at orthodontic band margins.
    VanMiller EJ; Donly KJ
    Am J Dent; 2003 Oct; 16(5):356-8. PubMed ID: 14677617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retentive [correction of Preventive] efficacy of glass ionomer, zinc phosphate and zinc polycarboxylate luting cements in preformed stainless steel crowns: a comparative clinical study.
    Khinda VI; Grewal N
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2002 Jun; 20(2):41-6. PubMed ID: 12435014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Demineralization around orthodontic brackets bonded with resin-modified glass ionomer cement and fluoride-releasing resin composite.
    Wilson RM; Donly KJ
    Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(3):255-9. PubMed ID: 11447960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of in vitro enamel demineralization potential of 3 orthodontic cements.
    Foley T; Aggarwal M; Hatibovic-Kofman S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 May; 121(5):526-30. PubMed ID: 12045772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of luting cements for minimally retentive crown preparations.
    Browning WD; Nelson SK; Cibirka R; Myers ML
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Feb; 33(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 11890033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bond strength for orthodontic brackets contaminated by blood: composite versus resin-modified glass ionomer cements.
    Reddy L; Marker VA; Ellis E
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Feb; 61(2):206-13. PubMed ID: 12618999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tensile bond strength of cast commercially pure titanium and cast gold-alloy posts and cores cemented with two luting agents.
    Menani LR; Ribeiro RF; Antunes RP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 18262015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro microleakage of luting cements and crown foundation material.
    Lindquist TJ; Connolly J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 11264938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Retentiveness of dental cements used with metallic implant components.
    Squier RS; Agar JR; Duncan JP; Taylor TD
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(6):793-8. PubMed ID: 11769829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparative study of some dental cements used in orthodontics.
    Sadowsky PL; Retief DH
    Angle Orthod; 1976 Apr; 46(2):171-81. PubMed ID: 776044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tensile bond strength of gold and porcelain inlays to extracted teeth using three cements.
    Michelini FS; Belser UC; Scherrer SS; De Rijk WG
    Int J Prosthodont; 1995; 8(4):324-31. PubMed ID: 7575974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.