These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7578296)

  • 1. Reusable biopsy forceps: a cost-effective measure for the endoscopy suite.
    Raltz SL; Kozarek RA; Pethigal PA; Moorhouse MA; Merriam LD
    Gastroenterol Nurs; 1995; 18(5):167-70. PubMed ID: 7578296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Disposable versus reusable biopsy forceps. A prospective cost analysis in the gastrointestinal endoscopy unit of the Dijon University Hospital].
    Lejeune C; Prost P; Michiels C; Roullaud-Guenfoudi MP; Phelip JM; Martin L; Rassiat E; Faivre J
    Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 2001; 25(6-7):669-73. PubMed ID: 11673734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost-minimization analysis of jumbo reusable forceps versus disposable forceps in a high-volume ambulatory endoscopy center.
    Hogan RB; Santa-Cruz R; Weeks ES; Alexander L; Hogan RB
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Feb; 69(2):284-8. PubMed ID: 18725156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biopsy forceps: reusable or disposable?
    Fireman Z
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2006 Jul; 21(7):1089-92. PubMed ID: 16824057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Disposable versus reusable biopsy forceps: a prospective cost evaluation.
    Deprez PH; Horsmans Y; Van Hassel M; Hoang P; Piessevaux H; Geubel A
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2000 Mar; 51(3):262-5. PubMed ID: 10699768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Advantages of disposable endoscopic accessories.
    Petersen BT
    Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2000 Apr; 10(2):341-8. PubMed ID: 10683219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biopsy forceps: disposable or reusable?
    Muscarella LF
    Gastroenterol Nurs; 2001; 24(2):64-8. PubMed ID: 11847729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A cost and performance evaluation of disposable and reusable biopsy forceps in GI endoscopy.
    Yang R; Ng S; Nichol M; Laine L
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2000 Mar; 51(3):266-70. PubMed ID: 10699769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Disposable versus reusable biopsy forceps in GI endoscopy: a cost-minimization analysis.
    Bourguignon C; Destrumelle AS; Koch S; Grumblat A; Carayon P; Chopard C; Woronoff-Lemsi MC
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2003 Aug; 58(2):226-9. PubMed ID: 12872090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reusable biopsy forceps: a prospective evaluation of cleaning, function, adequacy of tissue specimen, and durability.
    Kozarek RA; Attia FM; Sumida SE; Raltz SL; Roach SK; Schembre DB; Brandabur JJ; Ball TJ; Gluck M; Jiranek GC; Patterson DJ; Bredfeldt JE; Gelfand M; McCormick SE; Drajpuch DB; Moran DK
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2001 Jun; 53(7):747-50. PubMed ID: 11375582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A performance, safety and cost comparison of reusable and disposable endoscopic biopsy forceps: a prospective, randomized trial.
    Rizzo J; Bernstein D; Gress F
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2000 Mar; 51(3):257-61. PubMed ID: 10699767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Advantages of reusable accessories.
    Wolfsen HC
    Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2000 Apr; 10(2):349-59. PubMed ID: 10683220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Standardized reprocessing of reusable colonoscopy biopsy forceps is effective: results of a German multicenter study.
    Jung M; Beilenhoff U; Pietsch M; Kraft B; Rippin G
    Endoscopy; 2003 Mar; 35(3):197-202. PubMed ID: 12584636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reprocessing of reusable medical devices.
    Malchesky PS; Chamberlain VC; Scott-Conner C; Salis B; Wallace C
    ASAIO J; 1995; 41(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 7640417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Overview of the problem: reprocessing versus disposal of endoscopic accessories.
    Raltz SL; Kozarek RA
    Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2000 Apr; 10(2):329-39. PubMed ID: 10683218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reusable versus disposable forceps: the dilemma of cost and safety.
    Gordon SJ
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2000 Mar; 51(3):363-5. PubMed ID: 10699795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Disposable versus reusable biopsy forceps for colorectal epithelial cell proliferation in humans.
    Sandler RS; Cummings MS; Keku TO; Terse A; Mehta N
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2000 Oct; 9(10):1123-5. PubMed ID: 11045798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of costs for reusable and disposable syringes.
    Yimyam S; Srisuphan W; Plianpadung S; Senaratana W
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1995 Jul; 78 Suppl 1():S26-8. PubMed ID: 7666023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Disposable versus reusable biopsy forceps: a prospective evaluation of costs.
    Kozarek RA; Raltz SL; Merriam LD; Sumida SE
    Gastrointest Endosc; 1996 Jan; 43(1):10-3. PubMed ID: 8903810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The difficulty of reprocessing reusable rigid laparoscopic forceps and other endoscopic accessories: are disposables the answer?
    Health Devices; 1994; 23(1-2):57-8. PubMed ID: 8169151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.