These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7578296)

  • 21. Disposable endoscopic biopsy forceps: comparison with standard forceps of sample size and adequacy of specimen.
    Turk DJ; Kozarek RA; Botoman VA; Patterson DJ; Ball TJ
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 1991 Feb; 13(1):76-8. PubMed ID: 2007750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Reusable versus disposable biopsy forceps: an economic comparison].
    Jörgensen E; Busch C; Ujlaky R
    Z Gastroenterol; 2008 Oct; 46(10):1185-7. PubMed ID: 18937187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Prospective, randomized comparison of disposable and reusable biopsy forceps in gastrointestinal endoscopy.
    Yang R; Naritoku W; Laine L
    Gastrointest Endosc; 1994; 40(6):671-4. PubMed ID: 7859962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Disposable versus reusable instruments in laparoscopic surgery--a controlled study].
    Paolucci V; Schaeff B; Gutt C; Morawe G; Encke A
    Zentralbl Chir; 1995; 120(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 7887039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Endoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty: disposable and reusable instruments.
    Lau H
    Surg Technol Int; 2006; 15():109-15. PubMed ID: 17029170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Endoscope reprocessing and repair costs.
    Burdick JS; Hambrick D
    Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2004 Oct; 14(4):717-24, ix-x. PubMed ID: 15363776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Do costs decide? Disposable or reusable instruments in laparoscopic cholecystectomy?].
    Lefering R; Troidl H; Ure BM
    Chirurg; 1994 Apr; 65(4):317-25. PubMed ID: 8020351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of economic and environmental impacts between disposable and reusable instruments used for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Adler S; Scherrer M; Rückauer KD; Daschner FD
    Surg Endosc; 2005 Feb; 19(2):268-72. PubMed ID: 15580444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluating Quality and Adequacy of Gastrointestinal Samples Collected using Reusable or Disposable Forceps.
    Cartwright JA; Hill TL; Smith S; Shaw D
    J Vet Intern Med; 2016 Jul; 30(4):1002-7. PubMed ID: 27255591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. In vitro study and in vivo application of a reusable double-channel sphincterotome.
    Kozarek RA; Raltz SL; Brandabur JJ; Patterson DJ; Ball TJ; Gluck MG; Sumida SE; Roach SK; Drajpuch DE; Irizarry DL
    Endoscopy; 2001 May; 33(5):401-4. PubMed ID: 11396756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Reprocessing of gastrointestinal endoscopic accessories.
    Ogoshi K
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2000 Oct; 15 Suppl():G82-5. PubMed ID: 11100999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A prospective comparison of the costs of reusable and limited-reuse laparoscopic instruments.
    DesCôteaux JG; Blackmore K; Parsons L
    Can J Surg; 1998 Apr; 41(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 9575997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Reuse of disposable laparoscopic instruments: cost analysis.
    DesCôteaux JG; Tye L; Poulin EC
    Can J Surg; 1996 Apr; 39(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 8769924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Study deems single-use instruments more cost-effective than reusable in lap choly procedures.
    Hosp Mater Manage; 1995 Jul; 20(7):18-9. PubMed ID: 10172368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Performance and cost of disposable biopsy forceps in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: comparison with reusable biopsy forceps.
    Lim CH; Choi MG; Kim WC; Kim JS; Cho YK; Park JM; Lee IS; Kim SW; Choi KY; Chung IS
    Clin Endosc; 2012 Mar; 45(1):62-6. PubMed ID: 22741133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Reusable, re-posable and disposable instrumentation.
    Melzer A; Buess G
    Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1995; 3(2-3):127-8. PubMed ID: 7552127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Life Cycle Assessment and Costing Methods for Device Procurement: Comparing Reusable and Single-Use Disposable Laryngoscopes.
    Sherman JD; Raibley LA; Eckelman MJ
    Anesth Analg; 2018 Aug; 127(2):434-443. PubMed ID: 29324492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Durability and function of disposable versus reusable laparoscopic instrumentation.
    Bessell JR; Patkin M; Isabel L
    Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1995; 3(2-3):143-6. PubMed ID: 7552132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Single-use biopsy forceps for digestive endoscopy: a wise decision or a caricature of precaution principles?].
    Sautereau D; Palazzo L
    Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 2001; 25(6-7):653-5. PubMed ID: 11673730
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cost-effectiveness and safety of reusable tracheal suction tubes.
    Nanta P; Senarat W; Tribuddharat C; Danchaivijitr S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Dec; 88 Suppl 10():S86-8. PubMed ID: 16850647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.