These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7578296)

  • 41. Adequacy of disposable biopsy forceps for gastrointestinal endoscopy: a direct comparison with reusable forceps.
    Yang R; Vuitch F; Wright K; McCarthy J
    Gastrointest Endosc; 1990; 36(4):379-81. PubMed ID: 2210280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Manual methods are suboptimal compared with automated methods for cleaning of single-use biopsy forceps.
    Alfa MJ; Nemes R; Olson N; Mulaire A
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2006 Aug; 27(8):841-6. PubMed ID: 16874645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy lends itself well to another look at reusable vs. disposable instrument packs.
    Hickey M; Fields M
    Hosp Mater Manage; 1996 May; 21(5):14-5. PubMed ID: 10157583
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Reprocessing practice in digestive endoscopy units of district hospitals: results of a Portuguese National Survey.
    Soares JB; Gonçalves R; Banhudo A; Pedrosa J
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2011 Nov; 23(11):1064-8. PubMed ID: 21862930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Microbiological monitoring of endoscopes: 5-year review.
    Gillespie EE; Kotsanas D; Stuart RL
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Jul; 23(7 Pt 1):1069-74. PubMed ID: 18086113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Reprocessing flexible gastrointestinal endoscopes after a period of disuse: is it necessary?
    Vergis AS; Thomson D; Pieroni P; Dhalla S
    Endoscopy; 2007 Aug; 39(8):737-9. PubMed ID: 17661250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A comparison of three types of biopsy forceps in the endoscopic surveillance of Barrett's oesophagus.
    Dolwani S; Saleem H; Thompson IW; Allison MC
    Endoscopy; 2002 Dec; 34(12):946-9. PubMed ID: 12471536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Cost analysis comparing single-use (Ambu® aScope™) and conventional reusable fiberoptic flexible scopes for difficult tracheal intubation].
    Aïssou M; Coroir M; Debes C; Camus T; Hadri N; Gutton C; Beaussier M
    Ann Fr Anesth Reanim; 2013 May; 32(5):291-5. PubMed ID: 23561716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Comparing the cost of reusable and disposable packs.
    MacLean C
    Mater Manag Health Care; 1994 Feb; 3(2):24-6, 28. PubMed ID: 10131599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Multipatient use of prefilled disposable oxygen humidifiers for up to 30 days: patient safety and cost analysis.
    Golar SD; Sutherland LL; Ford GT
    Respir Care; 1993 Apr; 38(4):343-7. PubMed ID: 10145893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Reuse of disposables. Reprocessing issues taking users down 'slippery slope'.
    OR Manager; 1996 Jun; 12(6):1, 7. PubMed ID: 10157849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Disposable and reusable trocars.
    Watson DI
    Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1995; 3(2-3):140-2. PubMed ID: 7552131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Technicalities of endoscopic biopsy.
    Tytgat GN; Ignacio JG
    Endoscopy; 1995 Nov; 27(9):683-8. PubMed ID: 8903983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Risk associated with reprocessed reusable endoscopic instruments.
    Shiba M; Higuchi K; Fujiwara Y; Tominaga K; Watanabe T; Itani A; Oshitani N; Matsumoto T; Arakawa T
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Dec; 96(12):3465-7. PubMed ID: 11774989
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Reprocessing in digestive endoscopy units in Lombardy: results of a regional survey.
    Spinzi G; Fasoli R; Centenaro R; Minoli G;
    Dig Liver Dis; 2008 Nov; 40(11):890-6. PubMed ID: 18400569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Reusable instruments are more cost-effective than disposable instruments for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Apelgren KN; Blank ML; Slomski CA; Hadjis NS
    Surg Endosc; 1994 Jan; 8(1):32-4. PubMed ID: 8153862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. GI endoscopic reprocessing practices in the United States.
    Cheung RJ; Ortiz D; DiMarino AJ
    Gastrointest Endosc; 1999 Sep; 50(3):362-8. PubMed ID: 10462657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Liquid disinfecting and sterilization reprocessors used for flexible endoscopes.
    Health Devices; 1994 Jun; 23(6):212-53. PubMed ID: 7852072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Methodology of reprocessing reusable accessories.
    Alfa MJ
    Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2000 Apr; 10(2):361-78. PubMed ID: 10683221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A cost analysis of reusable and disposable flexible optical scopes for intubation.
    Tvede MF; Kristensen MS; Nyhus-Andreasen M
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2012 May; 56(5):577-84. PubMed ID: 22338623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.