These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7579214)

  • 21. Unsharp masking of low-dosed digital luminescence radiographs: results of a receiver operating characteristics analysis.
    Müller RD; Voss M; Hirche H; Buddenbrock B; John V; Bosch E
    Eur Radiol; 1996; 6(4):526-31. PubMed ID: 8798037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Experimental and clinical studies on utility of advanced multiple-beam equalization radiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary mass lesions].
    Itouji E; Kono M
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Nov; 54(13):1252-62. PubMed ID: 7610028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Conventional film-screen versus computed storage phosphor radiography. Simulated miliary lung disease in an anthropomorphic phantom.
    Mosser H; Pärtan G; Urban M; Krampla W; Ottes F; Hruby W
    Invest Radiol; 1995 Mar; 30(3):186-91. PubMed ID: 7797418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Thoracic radiographs with the AMBER system. A comparison of the diagnostic image quality of film-screen and storage-phosphor radiographs on the grid-partition stand and the AMBER system].
    Busch HP; Hartmann J; Freund MC; Lehmann KJ; Georgi M; Richter K
    Rofo; 1992 Mar; 156(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 1550921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Physics homogenization and the choice of screen-film combination in conventional thoracic radiography].
    Roversi R; Castaldini L; Guidarelli G
    Radiol Med; 1993 Dec; 86(6):885-92. PubMed ID: 8296012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Computed radiography dual energy subtraction: performance evaluation when detecting low-contrast lung nodules in an anthropomorphic phantom.
    Kimme-Smith C; Davis DL; McNitt-Gray M; Goldin J; Hart E; Batra P; Johnson TD
    J Digit Imaging; 1999 Feb; 12(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 10036665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of optimization and image processing in digital chest radiography: an ROC study with an anthropomorphic phantom.
    Kheddache S; Månsson LG; Angelhed JE; Denbratt L; Gottfridsson B; Schlossman D
    Eur J Radiol; 1991; 13(2):143-50. PubMed ID: 1743193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Selenium-based digital radiography of the chest: radiologists' preference compared with film-screen radiographs.
    Floyd CE; Baker JA; Chotas HG; Delong DM; Ravin CE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1353-8. PubMed ID: 7484562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Chest radiography: ROC phantom study of four different digital systems and one conventional radiographic system].
    Redlich U; Reissberg S; Hoeschen C; Effenberger O; Fessel A; Preuss H; Scherlach C; Döhring W
    Rofo; 2003 Jan; 175(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 12525979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Digital slot-scan charge-coupled device radiography versus AMBER and Bucky screen-film radiography: comparison of image quality in a phantom study.
    Veldkamp WJ; Kroft LJ; Mertens BJ; Geleijns J
    Radiology; 2005 Jun; 235(3):857-66. PubMed ID: 15845787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of an asymmetric screen-film combination with a conventional screen-film combination for chest radiography in 51 patients.
    Greaney T; McCoy C; Masterson J
    Br J Radiol; 1997 Sep; 70(837):929-32. PubMed ID: 9486069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Ability of chest X-ray to detect faint shadows documented as ground-glass attenuation in images of computed tomography: a comparison between flat-panel detector radiography and film-screen radiography.
    Nagatani Y; Nitta N; Ikeda M; Kitahara H; Otani H; Seko A; Tanaka T; Murakami Y; Takahashi M; Murata K
    Eur J Radiol; 2010 Sep; 75(3):384-90. PubMed ID: 19481399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Preliminary clinical applications of asymmetric screen-film systems in chest radiography].
    Higashida Y; Katsuda N; Tochihara S; Yoshioka S; Bussaka H; Tomiguchi S; Takada T; Matsumoto M; Takahashi M; Yoshida A
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Feb; 54(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 8121782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing two film-screen systems for chest radiography.
    Lefcoe MS; Cunningham IA; Vanderburgh LC; Sparrow RK
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 1996 Jun; 47(3):213-9. PubMed ID: 8640420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [New imaging methods in thoracic diagnosis. A study to evaluate digital storage screen radiography, the slit technique ("AMBER"), asymmetric ("InSight") and conventional film-screen techniques].
    Lehmann KJ; Busch HP; Drescher P; Loose R; Georgi M
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan; 3(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 8448224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Digital chest x-rays with a selenium detector: a prospective comparison with a conventional film-screen combination].
    Freund M; Reuter M; Palmié S; Harder E; Hutzelmann A; Heller M
    Rofo; 1997 Feb; 166(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 9116250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of exposure variation on the clinical utility of chest radiographs.
    Slone RM; Van Metter R; Senol E; Muka E; Pilgram TK
    Radiology; 1996 May; 199(2):497-504. PubMed ID: 8668802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Digital and conventional chest imaging: a modified ROC study of observer performance using simulated nodules.
    Chakraborty DP; Breatnach ES; Yester MV; Soto B; Barnes GT; Fraser RG
    Radiology; 1986 Jan; 158(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 3940394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Bedside thoracic radiography: a comparison between 3 different types of grid].
    Ciccotosto C; Storto ML; Guidotti A; Ferrante R; Bonomo L
    Radiol Med; 1994; 87(1-2):127-33. PubMed ID: 8128015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [ROC analysis in post-processing of image data in digital thoracic radiography].
    Müller RD; Hirche H; Voss M; Buddenbrock B; John V; Gocke P
    Rofo; 1995 Feb; 162(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 7881085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.