These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7580670)

  • 1. Commissioning a national programme of research and development on the interface between primary and secondary care.
    Wisely J; Haines A
    BMJ; 1995 Oct; 311(7012):1080-2. PubMed ID: 7580670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Setting priorities for research and development in the NHS: a case study on the interface between primary and secondary care.
    Jones R; Lamont T; Haines A
    BMJ; 1995 Oct; 311(7012):1076-80. PubMed ID: 7580669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Primary care group commissioning of services: the differing priorities of general practitioners and district nurses for palliative care services.
    Barclay S; Todd C; McCabe J; Hunt T
    Br J Gen Pract; 1999 Mar; 49(440):181-6. PubMed ID: 10343419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing payback from NHS reactive research programmes.
    Ferguson B; Kelly P; Georgiou A; Barnes G; Sutherland B; Woodbridge B
    J Manag Med; 2000; 14(1):25-36. PubMed ID: 11183996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Primary care trusts. In the know.
    Ali S; Walsh M; Seymour G; Bolus J; Ashworth R; Honey S; Small N
    Health Serv J; 2002 Jan; 112(5787):28-9. PubMed ID: 11828648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of stakeholder views on peer review of NIHR applications for funding: a qualitative study.
    Turner S; Bull A; Chinnery F; Hinks J; Mcardle N; Moran R; Payne H; Woodford Guegan E; Worswick L; Wyatt JC
    BMJ Open; 2018 Dec; 8(12):e022548. PubMed ID: 30552252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What are the relative merits of the sources used to identify potential research priorities for the NHS HTA programme?
    Chase D; Milne R; Stein K; Stevens A
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2000; 16(3):743-50. PubMed ID: 11028130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Developing a checklist for research proposals to help describe health service interventions in UK research programmes: a mixed methods study.
    Dorling H; White D; Turner S; Campbell K; Lamont T
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2014 Mar; 12():12. PubMed ID: 24593794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using programme budgeting and marginal analysis (PBMA) to set priorities: reflections from a qualitative assessment in an English Primary Care Trust.
    Goodwin E; Frew EJ
    Soc Sci Med; 2013 Dec; 98():162-8. PubMed ID: 24331895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Grant application and review procedures of the National Institute of Handicapped Research: survey of applicant and peer reviewer opinions.
    Fuhrer MJ; Grabois M
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1985 May; 66(5):318-21. PubMed ID: 3159374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rationalizing rationing in health care: experience of two primary care trusts.
    Iqbal Z; Pryce A; Afza M
    J Public Health (Oxf); 2006 Jun; 28(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 16641172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Streamlined research funding using short proposals and accelerated peer review: an observational study.
    Barnett AG; Herbert DL; Campbell M; Daly N; Roberts JA; Mudge A; Graves N
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2015 Feb; 15():55. PubMed ID: 25888975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing health research grant applications: A retrospective comparative review of a one-stage versus a two-stage application assessment process.
    Morgan B; Yu LM; Solomon T; Ziebland S
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0230118. PubMed ID: 32163468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Models of commissioning health services in the British National Health Service: a literature review.
    Chappel D; Miller P; Parkin D; Thomson R
    J Public Health Med; 1999 Jun; 21(2):221-7. PubMed ID: 10432254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. United Kingdom (England): Health system review.
    Boyle S
    Health Syst Transit; 2011; 13(1):1-483, xix-xx. PubMed ID: 21454148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Health services research in the United Kingdom 1990-1992.
    Dowie R
    J Public Health Med; 1995 Mar; 17(1):93-7. PubMed ID: 7786576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Commissioning for quality improvement.
    Gillam S; Siriwardena AN
    Qual Prim Care; 2013; 21(6):339-43. PubMed ID: 24512832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Managing for change.
    Fenney E
    Health Serv Manage; 1994 Apr; 90(4):24-5. PubMed ID: 10137120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Commissioning for equity in the NHS: rhetoric and practice.
    Wenzl M; McCuskee S; Mossialos E
    Br Med Bull; 2015 Sep; 115(1):5-17. PubMed ID: 26224695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In practice: the NHS market in the United Kingdom. Health Policy Network of the National Health Service Consultant's Association and the National Health Service Support Federation.
    J Public Health Policy; 1995; 16(4):452-91. PubMed ID: 8907766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.